skip to main content
10.1145/3638884.3638971acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Comparative Study of Blockchain Development Platforms

Published:23 April 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Blockchain technology is nowadays applied to several domains, essentially finance, healthcare, supply chain, and digital identity management. For enterprises to adopt a blockchain solution, many existing platforms facilitate the development process rather than implementing the system from scratch. Each platform has its own characteristics, capabilities, and limitations. Thus, several factors should be considered, including the consensus mechanism, the programming language, scalability, and security, as well as the popularity and maturity of the platform. Using a scoring approach, we provide a comparative analysis of the 12 most commonly used platforms, which facilitates comparison and selection of the most suitable platform for a developer’s application.

References

  1. 2021. Tendermint Roadmap. Retrieved September 2023 from https://github.com/bdengine/bde-tendermint/blob/master/docs/roadmap/roadmap.mdGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2023. The CMMI Ecosystem. Retrieved September 2023 from https://cmmiinstitute.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2023. Ethereum Roadmap. Retrieved September 2023 from https://ethereum.org/en/roadmapGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2023. Forbes Blockchain 50 2022. Retrieved September 2023 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2022/02/08/forbes-blockchain-50-2022/?sh=6ebe51d831c6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2023. Hyperledger Indy Roadmap. Retrieved September 2023 from https://wiki-archive.hyperledger.org/projects/indy/roadmapGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2023. Introducing ConsenSys Quorum. Retrieved September 2023 from https://insights.consensys.io/introducing-consensys-quorumGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 2023. Multichain Roadmap. Retrieved September 2023 from https://docs.multichain.org/getting-started/road-mapGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 2023. Top 9 blockchain platforms to consider in 2024. Retrieved September 2023 from https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/feature/Top-9-blockchain-platforms-to-considerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andy Amoordon and Henrique Rocha. 2019. Presenting tendermint: Idiosyncrasies, weaknesses, and good practices. In 2019 IEEE International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering (IWBOSE). IEEE, 44–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Manas Pratim Bhattacharya, Pavol Zavarsky, and Sergey Butakov. 2020. Enhancing the security and privacy of self-sovereign identities on hyperledger indy blockchain. In 2020 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC). IEEE, 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Stefano Bistarelli, Rocco De Nicola, Letterio Galletta, Cosimo Laneve, Ivan Mercanti, and Adele Veschetti. 2021. Stochastic modeling and analysis of the bitcoin protocol in the presence of block communication delays. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (2021), e6749.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lin Chen, Lei Xu, Nolan Shah, Zhimin Gao, Yang Lu, and Weidong Shi. 2017. On security analysis of proof-of-elapsed-time (poet). In Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems: 19th International Symposium, SSS 2017, Boston, MA, USA, November 5–8, 2017, Proceedings 19. Springer, 282–297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Victor Clincy and Hossain Shahriar. 2019. Blockchain development platform comparison. In 2019 IEEE 43rd annual computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC), Vol. 1. IEEE, 922–923.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Collin Connors and Dilip Sarkar. 2022. Comparative Study of Blockchain Development Platforms: Features and Applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01913 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Yousef Hashem, Elmedin Zildzic, and Andrei Gurtov. 2021. Secure drone identification with hyperledger Iroha. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Design and Analysis of Intelligent Vehicular Networks and Applications. 11–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Shereen Ismail, Hassan Reza, Hossein Kashani Zadeh, and Fartash Vasefi. 2023. A Blockchain-based IoT Security Solution Using Multichain. In 2023 IEEE 13th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC). IEEE, 1105–1111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alexander Ivanov, Yevhenii Babichenko, Hlib Kanunnikov, Paul Karpus, Leonid Foiu-Khatskevych, Roman Kravchenko, Kyrylo Gorokhovskyi, and Ievhen Nevmerzhitskyi. 2018. Technical comparison aspects of leading blockchain-based platforms on key characteristics. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dodo Khan, Mehak Maqbool Memon, Manzoor Ahmed Hashmani, Filmann T Simpao, Anthony C Sales, and Neil Q Santillan. 2023. A CRITICAL REVIEW ON BLOCKCHAIN FRAMEWORKS FOR DAPP. International Journal of Technology Management and Information System 5, 1 (2023), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. K Anitha Kumari, S Sangeetha, V Rajeevan, M Deva Dharshini, and T Haritha. 2022. Trade Management System Using R3 Corda Blockchain. In International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. Springer, 257–275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nitin Mittal, Srishty Pal, Anjali Joshi, Ashish Sharma, Sandeep Tayal, and Yogesh Sharma. 2021. Comparative analysis of various platforms of blockchain. Smart and Sustainable Intelligent Systems (2021), 323–340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nishara Nizamuddin, Khaled Salah, M Ajmal Azad, Junaid Arshad, and MH Rehman. 2019. Decentralized document version control using ethereum blockchain and IPFS. Computers & Electrical Engineering 76 (2019), 183–197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sandeep Kumar Panda and Suresh Chandra Satapathy. 2021. An investigation into smart contract deployment on Ethereum platform using Web3. js and solidity using blockchain. In Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing: Proceedings of ICICC 2020. Springer, 549–561.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Julien Polge, Jérémy Robert, and Yves Le Traon. 2021. Permissioned blockchain frameworks in the industry: A comparison. Ict Express 7, 2 (2021), 229–233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Swathi Punathumkandi and Venkatesan Meenakshi. 2020. A deep dive into Hyperledger. Blockchain and Machine Learning for e-Healthcare Systems (2020), 85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kenza Riahi, Mohamed-el-Amine Brahmia, Abdelhafid Abouaissa, and Lhassane Idoumghar. 2022. APBFT: An Adaptive PBFT Consensus for Private Blockchains. In GLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference. 1788–1793. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM48099.2022.10001568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Chinmay Saraf and Siddharth Sabadra. 2018. Blockchain platforms: A compendium. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Innovative Research and Development (ICIRD). IEEE, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Fabian Schär. 2021. Decentralized finance: On blockchain-and smart contract-based financial markets. FRB of St. Louis Review (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. A Secure. 2018. The zilliqa project: A secure, scalable blockchain platform. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCIP '23: Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Conference on Communication and Information Processing
    December 2023
    648 pages
    ISBN:9798400708909
    DOI:10.1145/3638884

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 April 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate61of301submissions,20%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format