skip to main content
10.1145/3640115.3640121acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiciteeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design and Research of Three-Phase Passive Inverter Based on SPWM Modulation

Published:26 March 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the development of modern power conversion technology, three-phase passive inverters are being increasingly used in various fields such as industrial and agricultural equipment, automotive and aerospace. However, there are still issues regarding significant harmonic effects and the need for improved dynamic response performance. To address these problems, this study utilizes Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation (SPWM) to modulate the three-phase passive inverter. A simulation model of the three-phase passive inverter with an LC filter is designed using Matlab/Simulink software, and the model is subjected to simulation analysis. The simulation results demonstrate that the three-phase passive inverter based on SPWM modulation can reduce harmonic effects and improve dynamic response performance, providing valuable guidance for decision-making in relevant industries.

References

  1. Obeidat, Firas. (2018). A comprehensive review of future photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy. 163. 545-551. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ratnam, Kamala & Kaliannan, Palanisamy & Yang, Guangya. (2020). Future low-inertia power systems: Requirements, issues, and solutions - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 124. 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109773.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dash, Dipak & Sadhu, Pradip. (2023). A Review on the Use of Active Power Filter for Grid-Connected Renewable Energy Conversion Systems. Processes. 11. 1467. 10.3390/pr11051467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Anttila, Sara & Döhler, Jéssica & Oliveira, Janaína & Boström, Cecilia. (2022). Grid Forming Inverters: A Review of the State of the Art of Key Elements for Microgrid Operation. Energies. 15. 5517. 10.3390/en15155517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Brüske, Sebastian & De Carne, Giovanni & Buticchi, Giampaolo & Liserre, Marco & Zhang, He. (2020). Extended Operation Range of Photovoltaic Inverters by Current Waveform Shaping. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. PP. 1-1. 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3006334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Shahparasti, Mahdi & Savaghebi, Mehdi & Hosseinpour, Majid & Rasekh, Navid. (2020). Enhanced Circular Chain Control for Parallel Operation of Inverters in UPS Systems. Sustainability. 12. 10.3390/su12198062.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Stella, Fausto & Pellegrino, Gianmario & Armando, Eric. (2020). Three-phase SiC inverter with active limitation of all MOSFETs junction temperature. Microelectronics Reliability. 110. 113659. 10.1016/j.microrel.2020.113659.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rafin, Sajjad & Islam, Rejaul & Mohammed, Osama. (2023). Power Electronic Converters for Wind Power Generation. 1-8. 10.1109/3D-PEIM55914.2023.10052364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Qiang, Zhi & Yaguo, Han & Lu, Wang & Kai, Luo & Yuan, Yang. (2023). Research on Electromagnetic Compatibility Technology Based on Airborne Electronic Equipment. 10.1007/978-981-19-7652-0_40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Z. Ma, Y. Li, Y. Sun and K. Sun, "Low Voltage Direct Current Supply and Utilization System: Definition, Key Technologies and Development," in CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 331-350, January 2023, doi: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2022.02130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Nandhini, E. & Arumugam, Sivaprakasam. (2020). A Review of Various Control Strategies Based on Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation for the Voltage Source Inverter. IETE Journal of Research. 68. 1-15. 10.1080/03772063.2020.1754935.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Won, Jehyuk & Srdic, Srdjan & Lukic, Srdjan. (2021). Optimized Multi-Carrier PWM Strategy and Topology Review for Multi-Cell Series-Parallel Medium-Voltage Rectifier. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics. PP. 1-1. 10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3129797.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Poyyamani Sunddararaj, & S. Rangarajan, Shriram. (2020). An Extensive Review of Multilevel Inverters Based on Their Multifaceted Structural Configuration, Triggering Methods and Applications. 9. 10.3390/electronics9030433.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Can, Erol & Sayan, Hasan. (2022). Development of Fractional Sinus Pulse Width Modulation with β Gap on Three Step Signal Processing. International Journal of Electronics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Stöttner, Julia & Rauscher, Andreas & Endisch, Christian. (2022). Pareto optimization of multilevel inverter structures regarding the DC magnitude, switching frequency and switching angles. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 142. 108259. 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mohammed, Mustafa & Qasim, Mohammed A. (2022). Single Phase T-Type Multilevel Inverters for Renewable Energy Systems, Topology, Modulation, and Control Techniques: A Review. Energies. 15. 10.3390/en15228720.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sarker, Rishiraj & Datta, Asim & Debnath, Sudipta. (2020). FPGA-based High-Definition SPWM Generation with Harmonic Mitigation Property for Voltage Source Inverter Applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. PP. 10.1109/TII.2020.2983844.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Alskran, Faleh & Simoes, Marcelo. (2020). Current Balancing Algorithm for Three-Phase Multilevel Current Source Inverters. Energies. 13. 860. 10.3390/en13040860.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Moghani, Javad & Mattavelli, Paolo & Khoshsaadat, Alireza & Asghari, Mohammad & Milimonfared, Jafar. (2021). An interharmonic dual switching frequency modulation strategy for impedance network inverters. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications. 49. 10.1002/cta.2933.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Yadav, Shivam & Mishra, Nidhi & Singh, Bhim & Padmanaban, Sanjeevikumar & Blaabjerg, F.. (2020). A Modified SPWM Technique for Improved Harmonic Performance of Single PV Array fed Grid-Tied Five Level Converter. IET Power Electronics. 13. 10.1049/iet-pel.2020.0438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ding, Li & Quan, Zhongyi & Li, Yunwei Ryan. (2021). General Bi-tri Logic SPWM for Current Source Converter with Optimized Zero-state Replacement. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. PP. 1-1. 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3066993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang, Weiman & Kang, Xinyue & Wang, Xinggui & Wang, Manliang. (2023). MPC-based three-phase unbalanced power coordination control method for microgrid clusters. Energy Reports. 9. 1830-1841. 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.12.079.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Choi, Hye-Won & Lee, Kyo-Beum. (2023). Review of Methods for Reducing Circulating Currents in Parallel Connected Modular Inverters. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology. 18. 10.1007/s42835-023-01389-z.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu, Fuzhuan & Chen, Mengna & Peng, Sheng & Wen, Shengjun. (2021). Optimal Switching Frequency for Three-phase Bipolar Inverter with Different Dead Time. 1-6. 10.1109/ICCSI53130.2021.9736218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sasidaran, C. & Sanjeevi, S. (2015). Harmonics reduction in three phase multilevel inverters using space vector modulation. 1-7. 10.1109/ICIIECS.2015.7192982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Vaishnav, Navneet & Jain, Amit. (2022). Reactive Power Flow in Induction Motor Drive with Inverter Output Sinusoidal Filter And Its Influence on Wide Frequency Operation. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. PP. 1-11. 10.1109/TEC.2022.3229111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mishra, Prasun. (2023). Modified Scalar Controlled PWM Inverter Fed Induction Motor Drive with Output Filter. 1-4. 10.1109/ICONAT57137.2023.10080681.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, Po & Tong, Xiaoshan & Wang, Zhoujing & Xu, Maoguang & Zhu, Jianfeng. (2023). Sensorless Model Predictive Control of Single-Phase Inverter for UPS Applications via Accurate Load Current Estimation. Sensors. 23. 3742. 10.3390/s23073742.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICITEE '23: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Technologies and Electrical Engineering
    November 2023
    764 pages
    ISBN:9798400708299
    DOI:10.1145/3640115

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 March 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format