skip to main content
10.1145/3640115.3640162acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiciteeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lifetime Prediction of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Based on Neural Networks with Different Layers

Published:26 March 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC), a form of environmentally friendly energy conversion technology, has garnered significant interest and widespread adoption. Nevertheless, the durability of PEMFC has persistently posed a major hurdle to its practical implementation. This study aimed to compare the effect of neural networks with different layers on the lifetime prediction of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC). This paper uses the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm and Bayesian regularization to carry out experiments on 4, 10, and 15-layer neural networks. The basic working principle of PEMFC is introduced. In terms of content, this paper draws some important conclusions by analyzing the performance of different algorithms in predicting the life of PEMFC. The results show that the 15-layer neural network combined with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm achieves the best prediction performance. This study has important implications for optimizing PEMFC design and increasing its lifetime, guiding future fuel cell technology development.

References

  1. Gao Weitao, Lei Yijie, Zhang Xun, Hu Xiaobo, Song Pingping, Zhao Qing, Wang Cheng, Mao Zongqiang.2022. Recent progress in proton exchange membrane fuel cells, Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 41(3), 1539-1555.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Du Zhenzhen, Wang Jun, Wang Jing, Yu Fan, Li Jiongli, Wang Xudong. 2022. Proton exchange membrane fuel cells for transportation and stationary applications, Journal of Materials Engineering, 50(12), 35-50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen GuangYao, Peng PeiXi, Tian YongHong. 2022. Robustness analysis for compact neural networks. Scientia Sinica (Technologica), 52(5), 689-703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Zhao Linna, Lu Shu, Qi Dan, Xu Dongbei, Ying Shuang. 2019. Daily Maximum Air Temperature Forecast Based on Fully Connected Neural Network, Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 33(3), 256-269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhavana Burramukku; Oğuzhan Ceylan; Mehdi Neshat. 2021. Power Output Prediction of Wave Farms Using Fully Connected Networks, 2021 56th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), Middlesbrough, United Kingdom, 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC50034.2021.9548274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Rubio. Jose de Jesus. 2021. Stability Analysis of the Modified Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm for the Artificial Neural Network Training. IEEE Transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 32(8), 3510-3524. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3015200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ahmadi, Shervin Parvini Hansson, Anders Pakazad and Sina Khoshfetrat.2021. Distributed localization using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Eurasip journal on advances in signal processing, 1, 1-26. doi: 10.1186/s13634-021-00768-wGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Feng, Wei Li, Qiaofeng Lu, Qiuhai Li, Chen Wang and Bo .2021. Element-wise Bayesian regularization for fast and adaptive force reconstruction. Journal of sound and vibration, 490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115713Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Zhu Xiaozhou. 2018. Design and Experimental Study of Self-humidifying Cathode Open PEMFC Control System, Southwest Jiaotong University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Akira Taniguchi, Tomoki Akita, Kazuaki Yasuda, Yoshinori Miyazaki. 2008. Analysis of degradation in PEMFC caused by cell reversal during air starvation, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33(9), 2323-2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. FCLAB Research.2014. IEEE PHM 2014 Data Challenge; FC Lab: Belfort, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ian T. Jolliffe, Jorge Cadima.2016. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments, Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 374(2065): 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICITEE '23: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Technologies and Electrical Engineering
    November 2023
    764 pages
    ISBN:9798400708299
    DOI:10.1145/3640115

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 March 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format