Meta-Modelling Kindness
Pages 280 - 289
Abstract
Kindness is a psycho-social phenomenon that is also recognized as an important pro-social behaviour. The use of digital technology provides opportunities to promote kindness in various ways, such as in social media campaigns and online communities. In principle, software engineers are well positioned to develop automated systems that can facilitate software-mediated kindness. However, in practice, incorporating kindness concerns explicitly in the development and use of software systems is challenging: kindness is highly context dependent, affected by a range of factors such as intentions and opportunity.
In this paper, we explore systematic ways in which kindness concerns can be considered by software engineers. We propose a novel meta-model that captures essential entities and relations associated with kindness. The meta-model enables the representation of possible instances or opportunities for performing acts of kindness, by considering the actors involved (such as giver, receiver, and observer), their psychological and social attributes that promote kindness (such as emotional states and social relatedness), the acts needed to fulfil kindness opportunities (such as motivation, ability, and timeliness), and other contextual factors (such as location and time). Our meta-model is demonstrated through two software application scenarios that enable charitable donations and kindness in business. Overall, our proposal offers a first, tentative, but concrete step towards enabling kind computing, and promoting kindness in software systems.
References
[1]
R Abelson and RC Schank. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hilladale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[2]
Faeq Alrimawi and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2022. Kind Computing. In The 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results (ICSE:NIER).
[3]
Faeq Alrimawi and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2023. Requirements for Designing Kind Spaces. In 2023 IEEE 31st International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW). 36--41.
[4]
Albert Bandura, Gian Vittorio Caprara, Claudio Barbaranelli, Maria Gerbino, and Concetta Pastorelli. 2003. Role of Affective Self-Regulatory Efficacy in Diverse Spheres of Psychosocial Functioning. Child Development 74, 3 (may 2003), 769--782.
[5]
Alixandra Barasch, Emma E. Levine, Jonathan Z. Berman, and Deborah A. Small. 2014. Selfish or selfless? On the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107, 3 (2014), 393--413.
[6]
Monica Y. Bartlett and David DeSteno. 2006. Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psychological Science 17, 4 (2006), 319--325.
[7]
Gian Vittorio Caprara, Guido Alessandri, and Nancy Eisenberg. 2012. Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102, 6 (2012), 1289--1303.
[8]
Joseph Chancellor, Seth Margolis, Katherine Jacobs Bao, and Sonja Lyubomirsky. 2018. Everyday prosociality in the workplace: The reinforcing benefits of giving, getting, and glimpsing. Emotion 18, 4 (2018), 507--517.
[9]
Jessica L Cotney and Robin Banerjee. 2019. Adolescents' Conceptualizations of Kindness and its Links with Well-being: A Focus Group Study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 36, 2 (feb 2019), 599--617.
[10]
Oliver Scott Curry, Lee A. Rowland, Caspar J. Van Lissa, Sally Zlotowitz, John McAlaney, and Harvey Whitehouse. 2018. Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 76 (may 2018), 320--329.
[11]
Julie J. Exline, Adrienne Morck Lisan, and Elianna R. Lisan. 2012. Reflecting on acts of kindness toward the self: Emotions, generosity, and the role of social norms. Journal of Positive Psychology 7, 1 (jan 2012), 45--56.
[12]
Murni Fatehah, Vitaliy Mezhuyev, and Mostafa Al-Emran. 2021. A Systematic Review of Metamodelling in Software Engineering. Recent Advances in Intelligent Systems and Smart Applications 295 (2021), 3--27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_1/COVER
[13]
BJ Fogg. 2007. Fogg Behavior Model. Last accessed on 03/05/2023. https://behaviordesign.stanford.edu/fogg-behavior-model.
[14]
Bj Fogg. 2009. A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology. 1--7.
[15]
David A. Fryburg, Steven D. Ureles, Jessica G. Myrick, Francesca Dillman Carpentier, and Mary Beth Oliver. 2021. Kindness Media Rapidly Inspires Viewers and Increases Happiness, Calm, Gratitude, and Generosity in a Healthcare Setting. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2021), 3938.
[16]
Sandra Burri Gram-Hansen. 2021. Defining Features of Behavior Design: Considering Context. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 12684 LNCS. Springer, 308--319. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79460-6_24
[17]
Caroline Greenhalgh and Paul Montgomery. 2020. A systematic review of the barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by philanthropists when determining which charities (including health charities or programmes) to fund. Systematic Reviews 9, 1 (aug 2020), 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13643-020-01448-W/TABLES/1
[18]
Esther Howe, Jina Suh, Mehrab Bin Morshed, Daniel McDuff, Kael Rowan, Javier Hernandez, Marah Ihab Abdin, Gonzalo Ramos, Tracy Tran, and Mary Czerwinski. 2022. Design of Digital Workplace Stress-Reduction Intervention Systems: Effects of Intervention Type and Timing. Vol. 16. ACM.
[19]
Bryant P.H. Hui, Jacky C.K. Ng, Erica Berzaghi, Lauren A. Cunningham-Amos, and Aleksandr Kogan. 2020. Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin 146, 12 (2020), 1084--1116.
[20]
Dorota Jasielska. 2020. The moderating role of kindness on the relation between trust and happiness. Current Psychology 39, 6 (jun 2020), 2065--2073.
[21]
Jillian J. Jordan, David G. Rand, Samuel Arbesman, James H. Fowler, and Nicholas A. Christakis. 2013. Contagion of Cooperation in Static and Fluid Social Networks. PLoS ONE 8, 6 (jun 2013), e66199.
[22]
Steven Kelly and Juha Pekka Tolvanen. 2007. Domain-Specific Modeling: Enabling Full Code Generation. John Wiley & Sons. 1--427 pages. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470249260
[23]
Sonja Lyubomirsky, Kennen M. Sheldon, and David Schkade. 2005. Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change., 111--131 pages.
[24]
Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Costa. 1997. Personality Trait Structure as a Human Universal. American Psychologist 52, 5 (1997), 509--516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
[25]
Joseph E. McGrath. 1995. Methodology Matters: Doing Research in The Behavioral and Social Sciences. Readings in Human-Computer Interaction (1995), 152--169.
[26]
Vikram Mehta, Arosha K. Bandara, Blaine A. Price, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2016. Privacy itch and scratch: On body privacy warnings and controls. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). Association for Computing Machinery, 2417--2424. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2851581.2892475
[27]
Marjan Mernik, Jan Heering, and Anthony Sloane. 2005. When and how to develop domain-specific languages. Comput. Surveys 37, 4 (2005), 316--344. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118890.1118892
[28]
Susan Michie, Maartje M. van Stralen, and Robert West. 2011. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science 6, 1 (apr 2011), 1--12.
[29]
Robin Milner. 2001. Bigraphical Reactive Systems. CONCUR 2001 --- Concurrency Theory 2154 (2001), 16--35.
[30]
Louisa Pavey, Tobias Greitemeyer, and Paul Sparks. 2011. Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37, 7 (2011), 905--917.
[31]
Christopher Peterson and Martin EP Seligman. 2004. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford University Press.
[32]
Christine Porath and Christine Pearson. 2013. The price of incivility. https://doi.org/10.2469/dig.v43.n2.32
[33]
Brian A. Primack, Ariel Shensa, Jaime E. Sidani, César G. Escobar-Viera, and Michael J. Fine. 2021. Temporal Associations Between Social Media Use and Depression. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 60, 2 (2021), 179--188.
[34]
L Rowland and D. Klisanin. 2018. Cyber-kindness: Spreading kindness in cyberspace. Media Psychology Review 12, 1 (2018). http://mprcenter.org/review/cyber-kindness-spreading-kindness-in-cyberspace/
[35]
Aaron C.H. Schat and Michael R. Frone. 2011. Exposure to psychological aggression at work and job performance: The mediating role of job attitudes and personal health. Work and Stress 25, 1 (2011), 23--40.
[36]
Shalom H Schwartz. 2006. Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications. Revue Francaise de Sociologie 47, 4 (2006).
[37]
Bran Selic. 2003. The pragmatics of model-driven development. IEEE software 20, 5 (2003), 19--25.
[38]
Michele Sevegnani and Muffy Calder. 2016. BigraphER: Rewriting and Analysis Engine for Bigraphs. In International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. Springer International Publishing, 494--501.
[39]
Katie Shillington. 2020. Kindness as an Intervention for Student Social Interaction Anxiety, Resilience, Affect, and Mood: The KISS of Kindness Study II. MSc. The University of Western Ontario.
[40]
Judith G. Smetana, Marina Tasopoulos-Chan, Denise C. Gettman, Myriam Villalobos, Nicole Campione-Barr, and Aaron Metzger. 2009. Adolescents' and Parents' Evaluations of Helping Versus Fulfilling Personal Desires in Family Situations. Child Development 80, 1 (2009), 280--294.
[41]
Margaret-Anne Storey, Neil A. Ernst, Courtney Williams, and Eirini Kalliamvakou. 2020. The who, what, how of software engineering research: a socio-technical framework. Empirical Software Engineering 2020 25:5 25, 5 (2020), 4097--4129.
[42]
Michelle Thomason (Ed.). 2022. Kindness in Management and Organizational Studies. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781802621570
[43]
Jennifer L. Trew and Lynn E. Alden. 2015. Kindness reduces avoidance goals in socially anxious individuals. Motivation and Emotion 39, 6 (dec 2015), 892--907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9499-5
[44]
Milena Tsvetkova and Michael W. Macy. 2014. The Social Contagion of Generosity. PLoS ONE 9, 2 (feb 2014), e87275.
[45]
Jean M. Twenge, Gabrielle N. Martin, and W. Keith Campbell. 2018. Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emotion 18, 6 (sep 2018), 765--780.
[46]
A Wąsowski and T Berger. 2023. Domain-Specific Languages: Effective modeling, automation, and reuse. Springer Nature.
[47]
Nebi Yilmaz and Ayça Kolukisa Tarhan. 2020. Meta-models for software quality and its evaluation: A systematic literature review. In International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 15th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement.
Recommendations
Automated Derivation of UML Sequence Diagrams from User Stories: Unleashing the Power of Generative AI vs. a Rule-Based Approach
MODELS '24: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and SystemsUser stories are informal, non-technical descriptions of features from a user's perspective that guide collaboration and iterative development in Agile projects. However, ambiguities in user stories can lead to miscommunication among stakeholders. Design ...
A DSL for Testing LLMs for Fairness and Bias
MODELS '24: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and SystemsLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into software systems to enhance them with generative AI capabilities. But LLMs may reflect a biased behavior, resulting in systems that could discriminate against gender, age or ethnicity, among ...
AI-Driven Consistency of SysML Diagrams
MODELS '24: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and SystemsGraphical modeling languages, expected to simplify systems analysis and design, present a challenge in maintaining consistency across their varied views. Traditional rule-based methods for ensuring consistency in languages like UML often fall short in ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2024
311 pages
ISBN:9798400705045
DOI:10.1145/3640310
- General Chairs:
- Alexander Egyed,
- Manuel Wimmer,
- Program Chairs:
- Marsha Chechik,
- Benoit Combemale
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
- Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
- SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
- IEEE CS
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 22 September 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- UKRI/EPSRC
- Science Foundation Ireland
Conference
MODELS '24
Sponsor:
MODELS '24: ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
September 22 - 27, 2024
Linz, Austria
Acceptance Rates
MODELS '24 Paper Acceptance Rate 26 of 124 submissions, 21%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 144 of 506 submissions, 28%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 180Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)180
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)53
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in