skip to main content
10.1145/3640457.3687106acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

RobustRecSys @ RecSys2024: Design, Evaluation and Deployment of Robust Recommender Systems

Published: 08 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, recommender systems have become indispensable tools in various domains, aiding users in discovering relevant content amidst the overwhelming amount of available material. However, the effectiveness and reliability of these systems are often hindered by various challenges such as data perturbations, missing data, noise, and bias. In this workshop, we aim to explore and address these challenges by focusing on the development of robust recommender systems. Robustness in recommender systems refers to their ability to maintain performance and effectiveness under adverse conditions, including unexpected variations in the data environment. By fostering discussions and collaborations among researchers and practitioners, this workshop seeks to advance the state-of-the-art in robust recommender systems, thereby enhancing their usability and trustworthiness in real-world applications.

References

[1]
Andrea Bacciu, Federico Siciliano, Nicola Tonellotto, and Fabrizio Silvestri. 2023. Integrating Item Relevance in Training Loss for Sequential Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Singapore, Singapore) (RecSys ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1145/3604915.3610643
[2]
Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2020. Bias in search and recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 2–2.
[3]
Filippo Betello, Federico Siciliano, Pushkar Mishra, and Fabrizio Silvestri. 2024. Investigating the Robustness of Sequential Recommender Systems Against Training Data Perturbations: an Empirical Study. To appear at ECIR 2024 (2024).
[4]
Camillo Maria Caruso, Valerio Guarrasi, Sara Ramella, and Paolo Soda. 2023. A Deep Learning Approach for Overall Survival Analysis with Missing Values. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.11465 (2023).
[5]
Jorge Castro, Raciel Yera, and Luis Martinez. 2018. A fuzzy approach for natural noise management in group recommender systems. Expert Systems with Applications 94 (2018), 237–249.
[6]
Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2023. Bias and debias in recommender system: A survey and future directions. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 41, 3 (2023), 1–39.
[7]
Jiawei Chen, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, and Xiangnan He. 2021. Bias issues and solutions in recommender system: Tutorial on the RecSys 2021. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 825–827.
[8]
Zunping Cheng and Neil Hurley. 2009. Effective diverse and obfuscated attacks on model-based recommender systems. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems. 141–148.
[9]
Giulia Di Teodoro, Federico Siciliano, Valerio Guarrasi, Anne-Mieke Vandamme, Valeria Ghisetti, Anders Sönnerborg, Maurizio Zazzi, Fabrizio Silvestri, and Laura Palagi. 2023. A graph neural network-based model with Out-of-Distribution Robustness for enhancing Antiretroviral Therapy Outcome Prediction for HIV-1. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17506 (2023).
[10]
Neil J Hurley. 2011. Robustness of recommender systems. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems. 9–10.
[11]
Stefania Ionescu, Aniko Hannak, and Nicolo Pagan. 2023. Group Fairness for Content Creators: the Role of Human and Algorithmic Biases under Popularity-based Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 863–870.
[12]
Anastasiia Klimashevskaia, Mehdi Elahi, Dietmar Jannach, Lars Skjærven, Astrid Tessem, and Christoph Trattner. 2023. Evaluating The Effects of Calibrated Popularity Bias Mitigation: A Field Study. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1084–1089.
[13]
Yang Liu, Alan Medlar, and Dorota Glowacka. 2023. On the consistency, discriminative power and robustness of sampled metrics in offline top-n recommender system evaluation. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1152–1157.
[14]
Bamshad Mobasher, Robin Burke, Runa Bhaumik, and Chad Williams. 2007. Toward trustworthy recommender systems: An analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 7, 4 (2007), 23–es.
[15]
Sejoon Oh, Berk Ustun, Julian McAuley, and Srijan Kumar. 2022. Rank list sensitivity of recommender systems to interaction perturbations. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 1584–1594.
[16]
Zohreh Ovaisi, Shelby Heinecke, Jia Li, Yongfeng Zhang, Elena Zheleva, and Caiming Xiong. 2022. Rgrecsys: A toolkit for robustness evaluation of recommender systems. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 1597–1600.
[17]
Hossein A Rahmani, Mohammadmehdi Naghiaei, Ali Tourani, and Yashar Deldjoo. 2022. Exploring the impact of temporal bias in point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 598–603.
[18]
Wondo Rhee, Sung Min Cho, and Bongwon Suh. 2022. Countering Popularity Bias by Regularizing Score Differences. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 145–155.
[19]
Aurora Rofena, Valerio Guarrasi, Marina Sarli, Claudia Lucia Piccolo, Matteo Sammarra, Bruno Beomonte Zobel, and Paolo Soda. 2023. A Deep Learning Approach for Virtual Contrast Enhancement in Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00471 (2023).
[20]
Yuta Saito, Suguru Yaginuma, Yuta Nishino, Hayato Sakata, and Kazuhide Nakata. 2020. Unbiased recommender learning from missing-not-at-random implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 501–509.
[21]
Harald Steck. 2010. Training and testing of recommender systems on data missing not at random. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 713–722.
[22]
Jinhui Tang, Xiaoyu Du, Xiangnan He, Fajie Yuan, Qi Tian, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Adversarial training towards robust multimedia recommender system. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 32, 5 (2019), 855–867.
[23]
Jiakai Tang, Shiqi Shen, Zhipeng Wang, Zhi Gong, Jingsen Zhang, and Xu Chen. 2023. When Fairness meets Bias: a Debiased Framework for Fairness aware Top-N Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 200–210.
[24]
E Union. 2022. Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (OJ L 277, 27.10.2022, pp. 1–102).
[25]
Bjørnar Vassøy, Helge Langseth, and Benjamin Kille. 2023. Providing Previously Unseen Users Fair Recommendations Using Variational Autoencoders. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 871–876.
[26]
Shoujin Wang, Xiuzhen Zhang, Yan Wang, and Francesco Ricci. 2022. Trustworthy recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (2022).
[27]
Chenwang Wu, Defu Lian, Yong Ge, Zhihao Zhu, Enhong Chen, and Senchao Yuan. 2021. Fight fire with fire: towards robust recommender systems via adversarial poisoning training. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1074–1083.
[28]
Teng Xiao and Suhang Wang. 2022. Towards unbiased and robust causal ranking for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 1158–1167.
[29]
Hao Yang, Zhining Liu, Zeyu Zhang, Chenyi Zhuang, and Xu Chen. 2023. Towards Robust Fairness-aware Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 211–222.
[30]
Jizhi Zhang, Keqin Bao, Yang Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, and Xiangnan He. 2023. Is chatgpt fair for recommendation? evaluating fairness in large language model recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07609 (2023).
[31]
Zhiheng Zhang, Quanyu Dai, Xu Chen, Zhenhua Dong, and Ruiming Tang. 2023. Robust causal inference for recommender system to overcome noisy confounders. In Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2349–2353.
[32]
Haiyuan Zhao, Lei Zhang, Jun Xu, Guohao Cai, Zhenhua Dong, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2023. Uncovering User Interest from Biased and Noised Watch Time in Video Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 528–539.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
RecSys '24: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
October 2024
1438 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 October 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Missing Data
  2. Noisy Data
  3. Recommendation Systems
  4. Robustness

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 1,295 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 67
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)67
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media