skip to main content
10.1145/3640457.3691712acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Exploratory Analysis of Recommending Urban Parks for Health-Promoting Activities

Published: 08 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Parks are essential spaces for promoting urban health, and recommender systems could assist individuals in discovering parks for leisure and health-promoting activities. This is particularly important in large cities like London, which has over 1,500 named parks, making it challenging to understand what each park offers. Due to the lack of datasets and the diverse health-promoting activities parks can support (e.g., physical, social, nature-appreciation), it is unclear which recommendation algorithms are best suited for this task. To explore the dynamics of recommending parks for specific activities, we created two datasets: one from a survey of over 250 London residents, and another by inferring visits from over 1 million geotagged Flickr images taken in London parks. Analyzing the geographic patterns of these visits revealed that recommending nearby parks is ineffective, suggesting that this recommendation task is distinct from Point of Interest recommendation. We then tested various recommendation models, identifying a significant popularity bias in the results. Additionally, we found that personalized models have advantages in recommending parks beyond the most popular ones. The data and findings from this study provide a foundation for future research on park recommendations.

References

[1]
Himan Abdollahpouri, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2019. Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-ranking. In FLAIRS. 413–418.
[2]
Luca Maria Aiello, Rossano Schifanella, Daniele Quercia, and Francesco Aletta. 2016. Chatty maps: constructing sound maps of urban areas from social media data. Royal Society Open Science 3, 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150690
[3]
Fabio Aiolli. 2013. Efficient top-n recommendation for very large scale binary rated datasets. In RecSys. ACM, 273–280.
[4]
Vito Walter Anelli, Alejandro Bellogín, Antonio Ferrara, Daniele Malitesta, Felice Antonio Merra, Claudio Pomo, Francesco Maria Donini, and Tommaso Di Noia. 2021. Elliot: A Comprehensive and Rigorous Framework for Reproducible Recommender Systems Evaluation. In SIGIR. ACM, 2405–2414.
[5]
Alice Battiston and Rossano Schifanella. 2024. On the need for a multi-dimensional framework to measure accessibility to urban green. npj Urban Sustainability 4, 1 (March 2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-024-00147-y
[6]
Alejandro Bellogín, Pablo Castells, and Iván Cantador. 2017. Statistical biases in Information Retrieval metrics for recommender systems. Inf. Ret. J. 20, 6 (July 2017), 606–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-017-9312-z
[7]
Linus W. Dietz, Pablo Sánchez, and Alejandro Bellogín. 2023. Understanding the Influence of Data Characteristics on the Performance of Point-of-Interest Recommendation Algorithms. (2023). arxiv:2311.07229 [cs.IR]
[8]
Linus W. Dietz, Mete Sertkan, Saadi Myftija, Sameera Thimbiri Palage, Julia Neidhardt, and Wolfgang Wörndl. 2022. A Comparative Study of Data-driven Models for Travel Destination Characterization. Front. Big Data 5 (April 2022).
[9]
Linus W. Dietz, Sanja Šćepanović, Ke Zhou, André Felipe Zanella, and Daniele Quercia. 2024. Examining Inequality in Park Quality for Promoting Health Across 35 Global Cities. (2024). arxiv:2407.15770 [cs.CY] https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15770
[10]
Angel Mario Dzhambov and Donka Dimitrova Dimitrova. 2014. Elderly visitors of an urban park, health anxiety and individual awareness of nature experiences. Urban For. Urban Gree. 13, 4 (2014), 806–813.
[11]
Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema, Paolo Cremonesi, and Dietmar Jannach. 2019. Are we really making much progress? A worrying analysis of recent neural recommendation approaches. In RecSys. ACM, NY, USA, 101–109.
[12]
Mouzhi Ge, Carla Delgado-Battenfeld, and Dietmar Jannach. 2010. Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In RecSys. ACM, NY, USA, 257–260.
[13]
Yuchin Juan, Yong Zhuang, Wei-Sheng Chin, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2016. Field-aware Factorization Machines for CTR Prediction. In RecSys. ACM, NY, USA.
[14]
Alexandros Karatzoglou, Xavier Amatriain, Linas Baltrunas, and Nuria Oliver. 2010. Multiverse recommendation: n-dimensional tensor factorization for context-aware collaborative filtering. In RecSys. ACM, NY, USA, 79–86.
[15]
Bart P. Knijnenburg and Martijn C. Willemsen. 2015. Evaluating Recommender Systems with User Experiments. Springer, Boston, MA, 309–352.
[16]
Yehuda Koren and Robert Bell. 2011. Advances in Collaborative Filtering. Springer, Boston, MA, 145–186.
[17]
Debolina Kundu and Arvind Kumar Pandey. 2020. World urbanisation: trends and patterns. Developing national urban policies: Ways forward to green and smart cities (2020), 13–49.
[18]
Urszula Kużelewska. 2020. Effect of Dataset Size on Efficiency of Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems with Multi-clustering as a Neighbourhood Identification Strategy. Springer, 342–354.
[19]
Géraud Le Falher, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2015. Where is the Soho of Rome? Measures and algorithms for finding similar neighborhoods in cities. In ICWSM, Vol. 9. 228–237.
[20]
Jolanda Maas, Robert A Verheij, Peter P Groenewegen, Sjerp de Vries, and Peter Spreeuwenberg. 2006. Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?J. of Epidemiology & Community Health 60, 7 (July 2006), 587–592.
[21]
Adam Poulston, Mark Stevenson, and Kalina Bontcheva. 2017. Hyperlocal Home Location Identification of Twitter Profiles. In HT. ACM, NY, USA, 45–54.
[22]
Kostis Pristouris, Harry Nakos, Yannis Stavrakas, Konstantinos I Kotsopoulos, Theofanis Alexandridis, Myrto S Barda, and Konstantinos P Ferentinos. 2021. An integrated system for urban parks touring and management. Urban Science 5, 4 (2021), 91.
[23]
Daniele Quercia, Rossano Schifanella, Luca Maria Aiello, and Kate McLean. 2015. Smelly maps: the digital life of urban smellscapes. In ICWSM, Vol. 9. 327–336.
[24]
Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. In EMNLP. ACL.
[25]
Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback. In UAI. AUAI Press, 452–461.
[26]
Diego Saez-Trumper, Daniele Quercia, and Jon Crowcroft. 2012. Ads and the City: Considering Geographic Distance Goes a Long Way. In RecSys. ACM, NY, USA, 187–194.
[27]
Pablo Sánchez and Alejandro Bellogín. 2022. Point-of-interest Recommender Systems Based on Location-based Social Networks: A Survey from an Experimental Perspective. Comput. Surveys (Jan. 2022).
[28]
Bart Thomee, David A. Shamma, Gerald Friedland, Benjamin Elizalde, Karl Ni, Douglas Poland, Damian Borth, and Li-Jia Li. 2016. YFCC100M: The New Data in Multimedia Research. Commun. ACM 59, 2 (Jan. 2016), 64–73.
[29]
Department of Economic United Nations and Social Affairs Sustainable Development. 2015. Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development., 16301 pages. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
[30]
David Vlahov, Nicholas Freudenberg, Fernando Proietti, Danielle Ompad, Andrew Quinn, Vijay Nandi, and Sandro Galea. 2007. Urban as a Determinant of Health. J. Urban Health 84, S1 (March 2007), 16–26.
[31]
Carole-Jean Wu, Robin Burke, Ed H. Chi, Joseph Konstan, Julian McAuley, Yves Raimond, and Hao Zhang. 2020. Developing a Recommendation Benchmark for MLPerf Training and Inference. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2003.07336
[32]
Shengbiao Wu, Bin Chen, Chris Webster, Bing Xu, and Peng Gong. 2023. Improved human greenspace exposure equality during 21st century urbanization. Nat. Commun. 14, 1 (Oct. 2023).

Index Terms

  1. Exploratory Analysis of Recommending Urban Parks for Health-Promoting Activities
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image ACM Conferences
            RecSys '24: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
            October 2024
            1438 pages
            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Sponsors

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            Published: 08 October 2024

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Extended-abstract
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Conference

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 1,295 submissions, 20%

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • 0
              Total Citations
            • 81
              Total Downloads
            • Downloads (Last 12 months)81
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
            Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            View Options

            Login options

            View options

            PDF

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format.

            HTML Format

            Figures

            Tables

            Media

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media