Seoyoung Kim
ABSTRACT
With the advance of logging technologies, various data-driven systems utilizing a vast amount of data are being developed and used in our lives. By analyzing data and users’ usage patterns, data-driven systems are designed so that a typical user can better use the system. However, some users perceive and use data-driven systems differently from that of the majority of users. This leads to digital inequalities leaving out non-typical user groups from fully utilizing data-driven systems. My doctoral research suggests that there are three parts of data-driven systems—data collection, model, and interface—that require diverse user groups to be considered. Specifically, my prior work understands how (1) users with high concerns about privacy during data collection [11], (2) users with low performance of the model, and (3) users with different interface usage patterns use the data-driven systems and what kind of difficulties they face [10] in various contexts such as automatic personality assessment in workplaces, automatic speech recognition, and video platforms for learning. For future work, I will investigate how a data-driven system should be designed to enable better user experience for various user groups by suggesting a user-adaptive automatic speech recognition system.
- Murray R Barrick and Michael K Mount. 1991. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel psychology 44, 1 (1991), 1–26.Google Scholar
- Anol Bhattacherjee. 2001. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly (2001), 351–370.Google Scholar
- Ching-Wei Chen, Paul Lamere, Markus Schedl, and Hamed Zamani. 2018. Recsys challenge 2018: Automatic music playlist continuation. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 527–528.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilbert A Churchill Jr and Carol Surprenant. 1982. An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of marketing research 19, 4 (1982), 491–504.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems. 191–198.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nathan Eagle and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2009. Eigenbehaviors: Identifying structure in routine. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 63 (2009), 1057–1066.Google Scholar
- Siyuan Feng, Olya Kudina, Bence Mark Halpern, and Odette Scharenborg. 2021. Quantifying bias in automatic speech recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.15122 (2021).Google Scholar
- Harmanpreet Kaur, Alex C Williams, Daniel McDuff, Mary Czerwinski, Jaime Teevan, and Shamsi T Iqbal. 2020. Optimizing for happiness and productivity: Modeling opportune moments for transitions and breaks at work. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gregor Kennedy, Carleton Coffrin, Paula De Barba, and Linda Corrin. 2015. Predicting success: how learners’ prior knowledge, skills and activities predict MOOC performance. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. 136–140.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seoyoung Kim, Donghoon Shin, Jeongyeon Kim, Soonwoo Kwon, and Juho Kim. 2023. How Older Adults Use Online Videos for Learning. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Hamburg, Germany,) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 440, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580671Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seoyoung Kim, Arti Thakur, and Juho Kim. 2020. Understanding Users’ Perception Towards Automated Personality Detection with Group-Specific Behavioral Data. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376250Google ScholarDigital Library
- Allison Koenecke, Andrew Nam, Emily Lake, Joe Nudell, Minnie Quartey, Zion Mengesha, Connor Toups, John R Rickford, Dan Jurafsky, and Sharad Goel. 2020. Racial disparities in automated speech recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 14 (2020), 7684–7689.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kibeom Lee, Michael C Ashton, and Kang-Hyun Shin. 2005. Personality correlates of workplace anti-social behavior. Applied Psychology 54, 1 (2005), 81–98.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ziming Liu. 2005. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of documentation (2005). https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510632040Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mikel K Ngueajio and Gloria Washington. 2022. Hey ASR system! Why aren’t you more inclusive? Automatic speech recognition systems’ bias and proposed bias mitigation techniques. A literature review. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 421–440.Google Scholar
- Ivan Robertson and Militza Callinan. 1998. Personality and work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 7, 3 (1998), 321–340.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marcin Skowron, Marko Tkalčič, Bruce Ferwerda, and Markus Schedl. 2016. Fusing social media cues: personality prediction from twitter and instagram. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference companion on world wide web. 107–108.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rachael Tatman and Conner Kasten. 2017. Effects of Talker Dialect, Gender & Race on Accuracy of Bing Speech and YouTube Automatic Captions. In Proc. Interspeech 2017. 934–938. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1746Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maryanne Wolf. 2018. Skim reading is the new normal. The effect on society is profound. Sat 25 (2018), 09–41.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Investigating How to Design Inclusive Data-Driven Systems for Diverse User Groups
Recommendations
User Centered Inclusive Design for People with Dyslexia: Experiences from a Project on Accessibility
HCSE 2014: Proceedings of the 5th IFIP WG 13.2 International Conference on Human-Centered Software Engineering - Volume 8742User participation is a key element in user centered design of interactive systems. However, applying established methods is not straightforward while realizing a system for people with cognitive impairment due to their specific, heterogeneous needs and ...
Interface Personalization through Inclusive User Modelling Web Service
Interacción '14: Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer InteractionThis paper presents a process of developing personalized applications through user modelling. The process involves understanding users' requirements through survey, formulating those requirements into a user model, integrating the model with different ...
User-Sensitive Inclusive Design
Special Issue: Innovations in user sensitive design, research and developmentAlthough “User-Centred”, “Participatory”, and other similar design approaches have proved to be very valuable for mainstream design, their principles are more difficult to apply successfully when the user group contains, or is composed of, older and/or ...
Comments