skip to main content
10.1145/3641343.3641438acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceitsaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

LSTM-based Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction Model under the General Direction Mechanism: DIR-LSTM

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 April 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Accurate prediction of future traffic flow trends is essential to solve urban transportation problems. However, traffic flow prediction faces great challenges due to the multimodal nature of pedestrian behavior and the complexity of the traffic environment. Although a large number of studies have been conducted to investigate these issues in depth, there are still some limitations. In order to address these challenges more effectively, we propose a pedestrian trajectory prediction model based on long-short-term memory networks (LSTMs): the DIR-LSTM. The model introduces an innovative generalized direction mechanism and a self-attention mechanism, which captures pedestrian movement patterns more comprehensively and accurately by predicting overall directional movements first and then gradually subdividing them into individual directions of movement. The DIR-LSTM is designed to address the challenges posed by the diversity of pedestrian behaviors and the complexity of urban environments. To validate the state-of-the-art of the model, we conducted experiments using the publicly available ETH [10] and UCY [9] datasets. The experiments demonstrate that DIR-LSTM performs better in terms of accuracy compared to other models, providing a more reliable prediction tool for future urban traffic management.

References

  1. A. Alahi, K. Goel, V. Ramanathan, A. Robicquet, L. Fei-Fei,and S. Savarese. 2016. Social lstm: Human trajectory prediction incrowded spaces. In CVPR, pages 961–971Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tomoya Ono and Takashi Kanamaru. 2021. Prediction of data 2021, The 21st International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2021)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jack M Wang, David J Fleet, and Aaron Hertzmann. 2007. Gaussian process dynamical models for human motion. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 30(2):283–298Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fernando T, Denman S, Sridharan S, 2018. Soft + Hardwired Attention: An LSTM Framework for Human Trajectory Prediction and Abnormal Event Detection. Neural Networks, 108:466-478Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Chung, C. Gulcehre, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio. 2014. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. ArXiv preprint, arXiv:1412.3555Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735–1780Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Gupta, J. Johnson, L. Fei-Fei, S. Savarese, and A. Alahi. 2018. Social gan: Socially acceptable trajectories with generative adversarial networks. In CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Su, J. Zhu, Y. Dong and B. Zhang, 2017. Forecast the plausible paths in crowd scenes. in IJCAI, pp. 2772-2778.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Lerner, Y. Chrysanthou, and D. Lischinski. Crowds by example. 2007. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 26, pages 655–664. Wiley Online LibraryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Pellegrini, A. Ess, K. Schindler, and L. Van Gool. 2009. You'll never walk alone: Modeling social behavior for multi-target tracking. In Computer Vision, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on, pages 261–268. IEEEGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Kim, S. J. Guy, W. Liu, D. Wilkie, R. W. Lau, M. C. Lin, 2015. BRVO: Predicting pedestrian trajectories using velocity-space reasoning. The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 201-217, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. I. Hasan, F. Setti, T. Tsesmelis, A. Del Bue, F. Galasso, and M. Cristani. 2018. Mx-lstm: mixing tracklets and vislets to jointly forecast trajectories and head poses. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00652Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Vemula A, Muelling K, Oh J. 2018. Social Attention: Modeling Attention in Human Crowds. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEITSA '23: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Smart Agriculture
    December 2023
    541 pages
    ISBN:9798400716775
    DOI:10.1145/3641343

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 April 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format