research-article

Open access

Energy Attacks in the Battery-less Internet of Things: Directions for the Future

Authors:

Thiemo VoigtAuthors Info & Claims

EuroSec '24: Proceedings of the 17th European Workshop on Systems Security

Pages 29 - 36

https://doi.org/10.1145/3642974.3652283

Published: 22 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

We study how ambient energy harvesting may be used as an attack vector in the battery-less Internet of Things (IoT). Battery-less IoT devices rely on ambient energy harvesting and are employed in a multitude of applications, including safety-critical ones such as biomedical implants. Due to scarce energy intakes and limited energy buffers, their executions become intermittent, alternating periods of active operation with periods of recharging energy buffers. We reveal how, by exerting limited control on ambient energy one can create situations of livelock, denial of service, and starvation, without physical device access. We call these situations energy attacks. We detail, analyze, and quantitatively demonstrate how these attacks can be applied to battery-less IoT devices, and illustrate their consequences on a system's regular operation.

References

[1]

M. Afanasov et al. 2020. Battery-Less Zero-Maintenance Embedded Sensing at the Mithræum of Circus Maximus. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SENSYS).

[2]

S. Ahmed et al. 2019. Efficient Intermittent Computing with Differential Checkpointing. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems (LCTES).

Digital Library

[3]

S. Ahmed et al. 2024. The Internet of Batteryless Things. Commun. ACM 67, 3 (2024).

[4]

S. Ahmed, A. Bakar, N. A. Bhatti, M. H. Alizai, J. H. Siddiqui, and L. Mottola. 2019. The Betrayal of Constant Power × Time: Finding the Missing Joules of Transiently-powered Computers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems (LCTES).

[5]

Saad Ahmed, Qurat Ul Ain, Junaid Haroon Siddiqui, Luca Mottola, and Muhammad Hamad Alizai. 2020. Intermittent Computing with Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks (EWSN).

[6]

Mahdi Amiri-Kordestani and Hadj Bourdoucen. 2017. A survey on embedded open source system software for the internet of things. In Free and Open Source Software Conference.

[7]

A. R. Arreola, D. Balsamo, G. V. Merrett, and A. S. Weddell. 2018. RESTOP: Retaining External Peripheral State in Intermittently-Powered Sensor Systems. Sensors (2018).

[8]

H. A. Asad et al. 2020. On securing persistent state in intermittent computing. In International Workshop on Energy Harvesting and Energy-Neutral Sensing Systems.

Digital Library

[9]

D. Balsamo, A. S. Weddell, A. Das, A. R. Arreola, D. Brunelli, B. M. Al-Hashimi, G. V. Merrett, and L. Benini. 2016. Hibernus++: A Self-Calibrating and Adaptive System for Transiently-Powered Embedded Devices. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (2016).

[10]

D. Balsamo, A. S. Weddell, G. V. Merrett, B. M. Al-Hashimi, D. Brunelli, and L. Benini. 2015. Hibernus: Sustaining Computation During Intermittent Supply for Energy-Harvesting Systems. IEEE Embedded Systems Letters (2015).

[11]

G. Berthou, T. Delizy, K. Marquet, T. Risset, and G. Salagnac. 2018. Sytare: a Lightweight Kernel for NVRAM-based Transiently-Powered Systems. IEEE Trans. Comput. (2018).

[12]

N. A. Bhatti, M. H. Alizai, A. A. Syed, and L. Mottola. 2016. Energy Harvesting and Wireless Transfer in Sensor Network Applications: Concepts and Experiences. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (2016).

[13]

N. A. Bhatti and L. Mottola. 2017. HarvOS: Efficient Code Instrumentation for Transiently-powered Embedded Sensing. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN).

[14]

Julia Borghoff et al. 2012. PRINCE-a low-latency block cipher for pervasive computing applications. In International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security.

[15]

A. Branco, L. Mottola, M. H. Alizai, and J. H. Siddiqui. 2019. Intermittent Asynchronous Peripheral Operations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SENSYS).

[16]

Alessandro Cammarano, Chiara Petrioli, and Dora Spenza. 2012. Pro-Energy: A novel energy prediction model for solar and wind energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks. In International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS).

Digital Library

[17]

Varun Chandola, Arindam Banerjee, and Vipin Kumar. 2009. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 41, 3 (2009).

Digital Library

[18]

Q. Chen, Y. Liu, G. Liu, Q. Yang, X. Shi, H. Gao, L. Su, and Q. Li. 2017. Harvest Energy from the Water: A Self-Sustained Wireless Water Quality Sensing System. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (2017).

[19]

Shenglei Chen, Dongyang Ou, Congfeng Jiang, Jing Shen, Li Yan, and Shuang-shuang Guo. 2020. Power Attack and Detection Technology in Data Centers: A Survey. In International Conference on Communications, Computing, Cybersecurity, and Informatics (CCCI).

[20]

H. Chiang, J. Hong, K. Kiningham, L. Riliskis, P. Levis, and M. Horowitz. 2018. Tethys: Collecting Sensor Data without Infrastracture or Trust. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI).

[21]

A. Colin and B. Lucia. 2016. Chain: Tasks and Channels for Reliable Intermittent Programs. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA).

[22]

A. Colin and B. Lucia. 2018. Termination Checking and Task Decomposition for Task-based Intermittent Programs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Compiler Construction (CC).

[23]

A. Colin, E. Ruppel, and B. Lucia. 2018. A Reconfigurable Energy Storage Architecture for Energy-Harvesting Devices. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS).

[24]

Kelton AP da Costa, João P Papa, Celso O Lisboa, Roberto Munoz, and Victor Hugo C de Albuquerque. 2019. Internet of Things: A survey on machine learning-based intrusion detection approaches. Computer Networks 151 (2019).

[25]

Bradley Denby, Krishna Chintalapudi, Ranveer Chandra, Brandon Lucia, and Shadi Noghabi. 2023. Kodan: Addressing the Computational Bottleneck in Space. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS).

Digital Library

[26]

F. Fraternali, B. Balaji, Y. Agarwal, L. Benini, and R. Gupta. 2018. Pible: Battery-Free Mote for Perpetual Indoor BLE Applications. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Systems for Built Environments.

[27]

M. Furlong, J. Hester, K. Storer, and J. Sorber. 2016. Realistic Simulation for Tiny Batteryless Sensors. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Energy Harvesting and Energy-Neutral Sensing Systems (ENSSYS).

[28]

David Gay, Philip Levis, Robert Von Behren, Matt Welsh, Eric Brewer, and David Culler. 2003. The nesC language: A holistic approach to networked embedded systems. Acm Sigplan Notices 38, 5 (2003).

[29]

Kai Geissdoerfer and Marco Zimmerling. 2022. Learning to Communicate Effectively Between Battery-free Devices. In USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI).

[30]

Zahra Ghodsi, Siddharth Garg, and Ramesh Karri. 2017. Optimal checkpointing for secure intermittently-powered IoT devices. In International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD).

Digital Library

[31]

Albert Greenberg, James Hamilton, David A Maltz, and Parveen Patel. 2008. The cost of a cloud: research problems in data center networks.

[32]

Michele Grisafi, Mahmoud Ammar, Kasim Sinan Yildirim, and Bruno Crispo. 2022. MPI: Memory Protection for Intermittent Computing. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 17 (2022).

[33]

Arslan Hameed et al. 2023. Exploratory Study Interviews. https://www.dropbox.com/s/3rt1z2acsbntc41/interviews-anon.pdf?dl=0

[34]

Arslan Hameed et al. 2023. Starvation Attack Simulator and Data. https://www.dropbox.com/s/gh634z2ascacce23/priority-attack.zip?dl=0

[35]

Arslan Hameed et al. 2023. Synchronization Attack Simulator and Data. https://www.dropbox.com/s/39123z2asdantd01/synch-attack.zip?dl=0

[36]

J. Hester and J. Sorber. 2017. Flicker: Rapid Prototyping for the Batteryless Internet-of-Things. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems (SENSYS).

[37]

N. Ikeda, R. Shigeta, J. Shiomi, and Y. Kawahara. 2020. Soil-Monitoring Sensor Powered by Temperature Difference between Air and Shallow Underground Soil. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (IMWUT) (2020).

[38]

Bashima Islam, Yubo Luo, and Shahriar Nirjon. 2023. Amalgamated Intermittent Computing Systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI).

Digital Library

[39]

N. Jackson, J. Adkins, and P. Dutta. 2019. Capacity over Capacitance for Reliable Energy Harvesting Sensors. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN).

[40]

H. Jayakumar, A. Raha, W. S. Lee, and V. Raghunathan. 2015. QuickRecall: A HW/SW Approach for Computing Across Power Cycles in Transiently Powered Computers. ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (2015).

[41]

Aleksandar Jovicic, Junyi Li, and Tom Richardson. 2013. Visible light communication: opportunities, challenges and the path to market. IEEE Communications Magazine 51, 12 (2013).

[42]

A. Kansal, J. Hsu, S. Zahedi, and M. B. Srivastava. 2007. Power Management in Energy Harvesting Sensor Networks. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (2007).

[43]

John Kanwar, Niclas Finne, Nicolas Tsiftes, Joakim Eriksson, Thiemo Voigt, Zhitao He, Christer Åhlund, and Saguna Saguna. 2021. JamSense: Interference and Jamming Classification for Low-power Wireless Networks. In IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC).

[44]

Konrad-Felix Krentz, Christoph Meinel, and Hendrik Graupner. 2017. Countering Three Denial-of-Sleep Attacks on ContikiMAC. In International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks (EWSN).

[45]

A. Krishnan and P. Schaumont. 2018. Exploiting Security Vulnerabilities in Intermittent Computing. In SPACE International Conference.

[46]

A. Krishnan, C. Suslowicz, D. Dinu, and P. Schaumont. 2019. Secure intermittent computing protocol: Protecting state across power loss. In Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[47]

Archanaa S. Krishnan and Patrick Schaumont. 2022. Benchmarking And Configuring Security Levels In Intermittent Computing. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (2022).

[48]

Chao Li, Zhenhua Wang, Xiaofeng Hou, Haopeng Chen, Xiaoyao Liang, and Minyi Guo. 2016. Power attack defense: Securing battery-backed data centers. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News 44, 3 (2016).

Digital Library

[49]

Huicong Liu, Hailing Fu, Lining Sun, Chengkuo Lee, and Eric M Yeatman. 2021. Hybrid energy harvesting technology: From materials, structural design, system integration to applications. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 137 (2021).

[50]

Qingzhi Liu, Kasım Sinan Yildirim, Przemysław Pawełczak, and Martijn Warnier. 2016. Safe and secure wireless power transfer networks: Challenges and opportunities in RF-based systems. IEEE Communications Magazine 54, 9 (2016), 74--79.

[51]

B. Lucia and B. Ransford. 2015. A Simpler, Safer Programming and Execution Model for Intermittent Systems. In Proceedings of the 36th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI).

[52]

K. Maeng, A. Colin, and B. Lucia. 2017. Alpaca: Intermittent Execution Without Checkpoints. Proceedings of the ACM Programming Languages (2017).

[53]

K. Maeng and B. Lucia. 2018. Adaptive dynamic checkpointing for safe efficient intermittent computing. In Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI).

[54]

K. Maeng and B. Lucia. 2019. Supporting Peripherals in Intermittent Systems with Just-in-Time Checkpoints. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI).

[55]

Andrea Maioli and Luca Mottola. 2021. ALFRED: Virtual Memory for Intermittent Computing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SENSYS).

Digital Library

[56]

A. Y. Majid, C. Delle Donne, K. Maeng, A. Colin, K. S. Yildirim, B. Lucia, and P. Pawelczak. 2020. Dynamic Task-Based Intermittent Execution for Energy-Harvesting Devices. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (2020).

[57]

Amjad Yousef Majid, Patrick Schilder, and Koen Langendoen. 2020. Continuous sensing on intermittent power. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN).

[58]

M Yousof Naderi, Prusayon Nintanavongsa, and Kaushik R Chowdhury. 2014. RF-MAC: A medium access control protocol for re-chargeable sensor networks powered by wireless energy harvesting. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 13, 7 (2014).

[59]

Van-Linh Nguyen, Po-Ching Lin, and Ren-Hung Hwang. 2019. Energy depletion attacks in low power wireless networks. IEEE Access 7 (2019).

[60]

Jorge Portilla, Andrés Otero, Eduardo de la Torre, Teresa Riesgo, Oliver Stecklina, Steffen Peter, and Peter Langendörfer. 2010. Adaptable security in wireless sensor networks by using reconfigurable ECC hardware coprocessors. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 6, 1 (2010).

[61]

B. Ransford, J. Sorber, and K. Fu. 2011. Mementos: System Support for Long-running Computation on RFID-scale Devices. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News (2011).

Digital Library

[62]

E. Ruppel and B. Lucia. 2019. Transactional Concurrency Control for Intermittent, Energy-harvesting Computing Systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI).

[63]

Syeda Manjia Tahsien, Hadis Karimipour, and Petros Spachos. 2020. Machine learning based solutions for security of Internet of Things (IoT): A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 161 (2020).

[64]

Texas Instruments. 2017 (last access: May 13th, 2020). MSP430-FR5969 datasheet. https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/msp430fr5969.pdf.

[65]

V. A. Thakor, M. A. Razzaque, and M. R. A. Khandaker. 2021. Lightweight cryptography algorithms for resource-constrained IoT devices: A review, comparison and research opportunities. IEEE Access 9 (2021).

[66]

Sharath K Udupa, Saumya K Debray, and Matias Madou. 2005. Deobfuscation: Reverse engineering obfuscated code. In Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE).

Digital Library

[67]

Emanuele Valea, Mathieu Da Silva, Giorgio Di Natale, Marie-Lise Flottes, Sophie Dupuis, and Bruno Rouzeyre. 2018. SI ECCS: SECure context saving for IoT devices. In International Conference on Design & Technology of Integrated Systems In Nanoscale Era (DTIS).

[68]

J. Van Der Woude and M. Hicks. 2016. Intermittent Computation Without Hardware Support or Programmer Intervention. In Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI).

[69]

Weitao Xu, Jin Zhang, Jun Young Kim, Walter Huang, Salil S Kanhere, Sanjay K Jha, and Wen Hu. 2019. The design, implementation, and deployment of a smart lighting system for smart buildings. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 6, 4 (2019), 7266--7281.

[70]

K. S. Yildirim, A. Y. Majid, D. Patoukas, K. Schaper, P. Pawelczak, and J. Hester. 2018. InK: Reactive Kernel for Tiny Batteryless Sensors. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SENSYS).

Cited By

Engstrand JKrentz KAsan NPadmal MYan WJoseph LRangaiah PMandal BRohner CMani MAugustine RVoigt T(2024)Security and Privacy for Fat Intra-Body Communication: Mechanisms and Protocol Stack2024 IEEE 49th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)10.1109/LCN60385.2024.10639677(1-9)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN60385.2024.10639677
Alfriehat NAnbar MAladaileh MHasbullah IShurbaji TKaruppayah SAlmomani A(2024)RPL-based attack detection approaches in IoT networks: review and taxonomyArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-024-10907-y57:9Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10907-y

Recommendations

Application-aware Energy Attack Mitigation in the Battery-less Internet of Things
MobiWac '23: Proceedings of the Int'l ACM Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access

We study how to mitigate the effects of energy attacks in the battery-less Internet of Things~(IoT). Battery-less IoT devices live and die with ambient energy, as they use energy harvesting to power their operation. They are employed in a multitude of ...
An ns-3 implementation of a battery-less node for energy-harvesting internet of things
WNS3 '21: Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on ns-3

In the Internet of Things (IoT), thousands of devices can be deployed to acquire data from the environment and provide service to several applications in different fields. In many cases, it is desirable that devices are self-sustainable in terms of ...
Enabling Green IoT: Energy-Aware Communication Protocols for Battery-less LoRaWAN Devices
MSWiM '21: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems

Many IoT scenarios, such as smart cities, wild life monitoring, or smart agriculture, involve thousands of battery-powered devices. The disposal and replacement of such batteries represent an important economical and environmental cost. To realize Green ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

EuroSec '24: Proceedings of the 17th European Workshop on Systems Security

April 2024

60 pages

ISBN:9798400705427

DOI:10.1145/3642974

Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 April 2024

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

EuroSys '24

Sponsor:

SIGOPS

EuroSys '24: Nineteenth European Conference on Computer Systems

April 22, 2024

Athens, Greece

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 47 of 113 submissions, 42%

Upcoming Conference

EuroSys '25

Sponsor:
sigops

Twentieth European Conference on Computer Systems

March 30 - April 3, 2025

Rotterdam , Netherlands

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
433
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)433
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)71

Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Engstrand JKrentz KAsan NPadmal MYan WJoseph LRangaiah PMandal BRohner CMani MAugustine RVoigt T(2024)Security and Privacy for Fat Intra-Body Communication: Mechanisms and Protocol Stack2024 IEEE 49th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)10.1109/LCN60385.2024.10639677(1-9)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN60385.2024.10639677
Alfriehat NAnbar MAladaileh MHasbullah IShurbaji TKaruppayah SAlmomani A(2024)RPL-based attack detection approaches in IoT networks: review and taxonomyArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-024-10907-y57:9Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10907-y

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten