skip to main content
10.1145/3643834.3660693acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Engaging Young People in the Expressive Opportunities of Digital Fabrication Through Craft-Oriented CAM-Based Design

Published: 01 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Digital fabrication can be a rich creative domain for young people. Most youth-oriented digital fabrication activities focus on CAD, where practitioners design solid geometry. Professional designers frequently bypass CAD and instead design at the level of the machine toolpath. This CAM-based design process allows for material exploration, unique textures, and complex shapes. We recognize young people’s role as designers and seek to adapt professional digital fabrication techniques to meaningful youth design activities. We present a youth-oriented CAM-based design curriculum consisting of 1) hands-on activities that introduce machine toolpath concepts, 2) a learner-oriented CAM software interface that scaffolds digital toolpath creation, and 3) project-oriented design activities that integrate CAM-based design and manual craft for ceramics and textile production. We evaluated our approach through a workshop with twelve high school students. Our research shows that young people can skillfully apply CAM-based design and manual craft to create functional and personally meaningful artifacts.

References

[1]
Morgan G. Ames, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Silvia Lindtner, David A. Mellis, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2014. Making cultures: empowerment, participation, and democracy - or not?. In CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI EA ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2579405
[2]
Autodesk. 2023. CAM Software. https://www.autodesk.com/solutions/cam-software
[3]
Alexander Berman, Elizabeth Deuermeyer, Beth Nam, Sharon Lynn Chu, and Francis Quek. 2018. Exploring the 3D Printing Process for Young Children in Curriculum-Aligned Making in the Classroom. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Trondheim, Norway) (IDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210799
[4]
Srinjita Bhaduri, Jesús G. Ortiz Tovar, and Shaun K. Kane. 2017. Fabrication Games: Using 3D Printers to Explore New Interactions for Tabletop Games. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Singapore, Singapore) (C&C ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3059463
[5]
Srinjita Bhaduri, Katie Van Horne, and Tamara Sumner. 2019. Designing an Informal Learning Curriculum to Develop 3D Modeling Knowledge and Improve Spatial Thinking Skills. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299039
[6]
P. Blikstein. 2013. Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors (2013), 1–21.
[7]
BlocksCAD. 2023. 3D Modeling for Kids. https://www.blockscad3d.com/front
[8]
Samuelle Bourgault, Pilar Wiley, Avi Farber, and Jennifer Jacobs. 2023. CoilCAM: Enabling Parametric Design for Clay 3D Printing Through an Action-Oriented Toolpath Programming System. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 264, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580745
[9]
Leah Buechley, Alyshia Bustos, Eleonora Edreva, Tyler Fenske, Reuben Fresquez, Samuel Hafer, Aislinn Handey, Michelle Louie, John Ng, Alan Shen, Randi Smith, Amber Sustaita, Michael Truong, Kai Vallon, and Kage Micaiah Weiss. 2022. A Computational Fabrication Course: Exploring Philosophical Reflection, Real-World Use, Personal Expression, and Social Connection. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication (Seattle, WA, USA) (SCF ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3559400.3562006
[10]
Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357123
[11]
Leah Buechley and Ruby Ta. 2023. 3D Printable Play-Dough: New Biodegradable Materials and Creative Possibilities for Digital Fabrication. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 850, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580813
[12]
Quinn Burke and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2010. Programming & storytelling: opportunities for learning about coding & composition. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Barcelona, Spain) (IDC ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 348–351. https://doi.org/10.1145/1810543.1810611
[13]
Quinn Burke and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2012. The writers’ workshop for youth programmers: digital storytelling with scratch in middle school classrooms. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA) (SIGCSE ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157264
[14]
Monica M. Chan and Paulo Blikstein. 2018. Exploring Problem-Based Learning for Middle School Design and Engineering Education in Digital Fabrication Laboratories. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 12, 2 (2018).
[15]
Christos Chytas, Eike Brahms, Ira Diethelm, and Erik Barendsen. 2022. Youth’s Perspectives of Computational Design in Making-Based Coding Activities. In 6th FabLearn Europe / MakeEd Conference 2022 (Copenhagen, Denmark) (FabLearn Europe / MakeEd 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3535227.3535231
[16]
Code.org. Year of access. Code.org - Computer Science Unplugged. https://code.org/curriculum/unplugged
[17]
D.G. Cuevas and G. Pugliese. 2020. Advanced 3D Printing with Grasshopper, Clay and FDM. Independently published.https://books.google.com/books?id=2nGzzQEACAAJ
[18]
Richard Davis, Yasmin Kafai, Veena Vasudevan, and Eunkyoung Lee. 2013. The education arcade: crafting, remixing, and playing with controllers for Scratch games. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, New York, USA) (IDC ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 439–442. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485846
[19]
Ashley Del Valle, Mert Toka, Alejandro Aponte, and Jennifer Jacobs. 2023. PunchPrint: Creating Composite Fiber-Filament Craft Artifacts by Integrating Punch Needle Embroidery and 3D Printing. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 216, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581298
[20]
Laura Devendorf and Kimiko Ryokai. 2015. Being the Machine: Reconfiguring Agency and Control in Hybrid Fabrication. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2477–2486. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702547
[21]
Dale Dougherty. 2012. The Maker Movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 7, 3 (07 2012), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135 arXiv:https://direct.mit.edu/itgg/article-pdf/7/3/11/704919/inov_a_00135.pdf
[22]
Michael Eisenberg. 2005. Technology and the Future of Educational Crafts. Educational Technology 45, 3 (2005), 3–11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44429206
[23]
Deborah A. Fields, Kristin A. Searle, and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2016. Deconstruction Kits for Learning: Students’ Collaborative Debugging of Electronic Textile Designs. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (Stanford, CA, USA) (FabLearn ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 82–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003397.3003410
[24]
Jack Forman, Mustafa Doga Dogan, Hamilton Forsythe, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2020. DefeXtiles: 3D Printing Quasi-Woven Fabric via Under-Extrusion. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Virtual Event, USA) (UIST ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1222–1233. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379337.3415876
[25]
Neil A. Gershenfeld. 2007. Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop–from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication.
[26]
Terrell Glenn, Ananya Ipsita, Caleb Carithers, Kylie Peppler, and Karthik Ramani. 2020. StoryMakAR: Bringing Stories to Life With An Augmented Reality & Physical Prototyping Toolkit for Youth. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Honolulu, HI, USA, ) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376790
[27]
Foad Hamidi, Thomas S. Young, Josh Sideris, Ramtin Ardeshiri, Jacob Leung, Pouya Rezai, and Barbara Whitmer. 2017. Using Robotics and 3D Printing to Introduce Youth to Computer Science and Electromechanical Engineering. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI EA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 942–950. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053346
[28]
Alexandria K. Hansen, Eric R. Hansen, Taylor Hall, Mack Fixler, and Danielle Harlow. 2017. Fidgeting with Fabrication: Students with ADHD Making Tools to Focus. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (Stanford, CA, USA) (FabLearn ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3141798.3141812
[29]
Anneli Hershman, Juliana Nazare, Jie Qi, Martin Saveski, Deb Roy, and Mitchel Resnick. 2018. Light it up: using paper circuitry to enhance low-fidelity paper prototypes for children. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Trondheim, Norway) (IDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202758
[30]
Andrew Heumann. 2019. Human UI: A User Interface for Grasshopper. https://www.food4rhino.com/en/app/human-ui
[31]
Mare Hirsch, Gabrielle Benabdallah, Jennifer Jacobs, and Nadya Peek. 2023. Nothing Like Compilation: How Professional Digital Fabrication Workflows Go Beyond Extruding, Milling, and Machines. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (jul 2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3609328 Just Accepted.
[32]
Nathaniel Hudson, Celena Alcock, and Parmit K. Chilana. 2016. Understanding Newcomers to 3D Printing: Motivations, Workflows, and Barriers of Casual Makers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858266
[33]
Jennifer Jacobs. 2013. DressCode: Programming and Computational Fashion. Web Resource. http://alumni.media.mit.edu/ jacobsj/resources/DressCode.pdf
[34]
Jennifer Jacobs and Leah Buechley. 2013. Codeable Objects: Computational Design and Digital Fabrication for Novice Programmers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466211
[35]
Yasmin Kafai and Veena Vasudevan. 2015. Hi-Lo tech games: crafting, coding and collaboration of augmented board games by high school youth. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boston, Massachusetts) (IDC ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771853
[36]
Yasmin B. Kafai, Kylie A. Peppler, Quinn Burke, Michael Moore, and Diane Glosson. 2010. Fröbel’s forgotten gift: textile construction kits as pathways into play, design and computation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Barcelona, Spain) (IDC ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1145/1810543.1810574
[37]
Yasmin B. Kafai, Kristin Searle, Eliot Kaplan, Deborah Fields, Eunkyoung Lee, and Debora Lui. 2013. Cupcake cushions, scooby doo shirts, and soft boomboxes: e-textiles in high school to promote computational concepts, practices, and perceptions. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Denver, Colorado, USA) (SIGCSE ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445291
[38]
Petra Kastl, Oliver Krisch, and Ralf Romeike. 2017. 3D Printing as Medium for Motivation and Creativity in Computer Science Lessons. In International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:27628090
[39]
Majeed Kazemitabaar, Liang He, Katie Wang, Chloe Aloimonos, Tony Cheng, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2016. ReWear: Early Explorations of a Modular Wearable Construction Kit for Young Children. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2072–2080. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892525
[40]
CNC Kitchen. Year of publication. Non-Planar 3D Printing by Bending G-Code. https://www.cnckitchen.com/blog/non-planar-3d-printing-by-bending-g-code Accessed: Month Day, Year.
[41]
Gierad Laput, Xiang ’Anthony’ Chen, and Chris Harrison. 2015. 3D Printed Hair: Fused Deposition Modeling of Soft Strands, Fibers, and Bristles. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (Charlotte, NC, USA) (UIST ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 593–597. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807484
[42]
Full Spectrum Laser. 2023. Thinking in 3D. https://blog.fslaser.com/intermediatelaserlessons/lesson4
[43]
Taekyeom Lee. 2018. New Typographic Experience in the Post-digital Age with 3D Printing and Ceramics. In Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design, WonJoon Chung and Cliff Sungsoo Shin (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 161–170.
[44]
LeoCAD. 2023. A CAD application for creating virtual LEGO models. https://www.leocad.org/
[45]
LIA. 2014. Filament Sculptures. https://www.liaworks.com/theprojects/filament-sculptures/
[46]
Yizhou Ma, Jelle Potappel, Aneesh Chauhan, Maarten A.I. Schutyser, Remko M. Boom, and Lu Zhang. 2023. Improving 3D food printing performance using computer vision and feedforward nozzle motion control. Journal of Food Engineering 339 (2023), 111277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111277
[47]
Emerging Objects. 2016. GCODE.clay. https://emergingobjects.com/project/gcode-clay/
[48]
Seymour Papert. Year. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. http://worrydream.com/refs/Papert%20-%20Mindstorms%201st%20ed.pdf Accessed on Sept. 2023.
[49]
Celia Pearce, Gillian Smith, Jeanie Choi, and Isabella Carlsson. 2016. eBee: Merging Quilting, Electronics & Board Game Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3877–3880. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2891099
[50]
Franklin Pezutti-Dyer and Leah Buechley. 2022. Extruder-Turtle: A Library for 3D Printing Delicate, Textured, and Flexible Objects. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Daejeon, Republic of Korea) (TEI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3501312
[51]
Jie Qi, Leah Buechley, Andrew "bunnie" Huang, Patricia Ng, Sean Cross, and Joseph A. Paradiso. 2018. Chibitronics in the Wild: Engaging New Communities in Creating Technology with Paper Electronics. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Montreal QC, Canada, ) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173826
[52]
Jie Qi, Asli Demir, and Joseph A. Paradiso. 2017. Code Collage: Tangible Programming On Paper With Circuit Stickers. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Denver, Colorado, USA, ) (CHI EA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1970–1977. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053084
[53]
Kanjun Qiu, Leah Buechley, Edward Baafi, and Wendy Dubow. 2013. A curriculum for teaching computer science through computational textiles. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, New York, USA) (IDC ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485787
[54]
Mitchel Resnick, Eric Rosenbaum, and Yasmin B Kafai. 2008. Designing for tinkerability. Designing for Learning in a Networked World (2008). https://web.media.mit.edu/ mres/papers/designing-for-tinkerability.pdf
[55]
Gabriela T. Richard and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2015. Making physical and digital games with e-textiles: a workshop for youth making responsive wearable games and controllers. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boston, Massachusetts) (IDC ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771926
[56]
Manuel Riel and Ralf Romeike. 2021. 3D Print your Artifacts – 3D Turtle Geometry as an Introduction to Programming. 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (2021), 1454–1461. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:235476499
[57]
Blair Subbaraman and Nadya Peek. 2022. P5.Fab: Direct Control of Digital Fabrication Machines from a Creative Coding Environment. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1148–1161. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533496
[58]
Haruki Takahashi and Jeeeun Kim. 2019. 3D Printed Fabric: Techniques for Design and 3D Weaving Programmable Textiles. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Orleans, LA, USA) (UIST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347896
[59]
Tinkercad. 2023. Tinkercad - 3D Design, Electronics, and Coding for Kids. https://www.tinkercad.com/
[60]
Jasper Tran O’Leary, Gabrielle Benabdallah, and Nadya Peek. 2023. Imprimer: Computational Notebooks for CNC Milling. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 207, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581334
[61]
Dishita G Turakhia, Stefanie Mueller, and Kayla DesPortes. 2022. Identifying Game Mechanics for Integrating Fabrication Activities within Existing Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 87, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517721
[62]
Sherry Turkle and Seymour Papert. 1990. Epistemological Pluralism. (1990). https://web.media.mit.edu/ ascii/papers/turkle_papert_1990.pdf
[63]
Hannah Twigg-Smith, Jasper Tran O’Leary, and Nadya Peek. 2021. Tools, Tricks, and Hacks: Exploring Novel Digital Fabrication Workflows on #PlotterTwitter. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 594, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445653
[64]
University of California, Santa Barbara. [n. d.]. SST CSEP Program. https://sst-csep.cnsi.ucsb.edu/.
[65]
University of Canterbury. 2023. CS Unplugged. https://csunplugged.org/ Accessed: August 2023.
[66]
J Van Zak, YJ Tai, AS Ling, and N Oxman. 2017. Parametric chemistry reverse engineering biomaterial composites for additive manufacturing of bio-cement structures across scales. (2017).
[67]
Veena Vasudevan, Yasmin Kafai, and Lei Yang. 2015. Make, wear, play: remix designs of wearable controllers for scratch games by middle school youth. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boston, Massachusetts) (IDC ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771911
[68]
Xuefei Yang and Stefania Druga. 2019. Legoons: Inflatable Construction Kit for Children. In Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (Barcelona, Spain) (CHI PLAY ’19 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341215.3356980
[69]
Tom Yeh and Jeeeun Kim. 2018. CraftML: 3D Modeling is Web Programming. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174101
[70]
Yi Zhang, Bin Wang, Junchao Hu, Tianyuan Yin, Tao Yue, Na Liu, and Yuanyuan Liu. 2021. 3D Composite Bioprinting for Fabrication of Artificial Biological Tissues. IJB 7, 1 (2021), 299. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i1.299

Index Terms

  1. Engaging Young People in the Expressive Opportunities of Digital Fabrication Through Craft-Oriented CAM-Based Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 2024
    3616 pages
    ISBN:9798400705830
    DOI:10.1145/3643834
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 July 2024

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • NSF, Faculty Outreach Grant, UCSB and Academic Senate Grant, UCSB

    Conference

    DIS '24
    Sponsor:
    DIS '24: Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 1 - 5, 2024
    Copenhagen, Denmark

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Upcoming Conference

    DIS '25
    Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 5 - 9, 2025
    Funchal , Portugal

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 268
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)268
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)44
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media