Proposing a Context-informed Layer-based Framework: Incorporating Context into Designing mHealth Technology for Fatigue Management
Authors: 
Xinghui (Erica) Yan, Loubna Baroudi, 
Rongqi Bei, Leila Boudalia, Stephen M Cain, Kira Barton, K. Alex Shorter, Mark W. NewmanAuthors Info & Claims
Xinghui (Erica) Yan, Loubna Baroudi, Rongqi Bei, Leila Boudalia, Stephen M Cain, Kira Barton, K. Alex Shorter, Mark W. NewmanAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 571 - 583
Abstract
Owing to the multi-factorial nature of fatigue, leveraging context to effectively monitor and intervene with fatigue symptoms presents a significant challenge. This paper aimed to understand how to incorporate context into designing mHealth systems for fatigue management. We conducted a two-week field study with 20 fatigue-vulnerable individuals using an activity-tracking sensor and self-reporting. We conducted data-prompted interviews to explore phenomena about participants’ fatigue experiences. Findings show a heterogeneous relationship between context and fatigue, which can be attributed to the phenomena that: (1) participants were influenced by multiple fatigue-inducing factors for different durations; (2) broad contexts moderated participants’ perceptions and coping strategies in response to local contexts; (3) the predictability and repetition of activities influenced participants’ fatigue perception and coping strategies. We propose a context-informed layer-based framework integrating these phenomena and discuss implications for designing fatigue management tools informed by our framework.
References
[1]
Lauren S Aaronson, Leonie Pallikkathayil, and Frances Crighton. 2003. A qualitative investigation of fatigue among healthy working adults. West. J. Nurs. Res. 25, 4 (June 2003), 419–433.
[2]
Gregory D Abowd, Anind K Dey, Peter J Brown, Nigel Davies, Mark Smith, and Pete Steggles. 1999. Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing: First International Symposium, HUC’99 Karlsruhe, Germany, September 27–29, 1999 Proceedings 1. Springer, 304–307.
[3]
Yang Bai, Yu Guan, Jian Qing Shi, and Wan-Fai Ng. 2021. Towards automated fatigue assessment using wearable sensing and mixed-effects models. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 129–131.
[4]
Thomas J Balkin, William J Horrey, R Curtis Graeber, Charles A Czeisler, and David F Dinges. 2011. The challenges and opportunities of technological approaches to fatigue management. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43, 2 (March 2011), 565–572.
[5]
Rebecca Band, Christine Barrowclough, Kim Caldwell, Richard Emsley, and Alison Wearden. 2017. Activity patterns in response to symptoms in patients being treated for chronic fatigue syndrome: An experience sampling methodology study. Health Psychol. 36, 3 (March 2017), 264–269.
[6]
Nikola Banovic, Tofi Buzali, Fanny Chevalier, Jennifer Mankoff, and Anind K Dey. 2016. Modeling and understanding human routine behavior. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 248–260.
[7]
Jakob E Bardram, Mads Frost, Nanna Tuxen, Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, and Lars V Kessing. 2016. Designing context-aware cognitive behavioral therapy for unipolar and bipolar disorders. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM international Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct. 1162–1170.
[8]
Jared S Bauer, Mark W Newman, and Julie A Kientz. 2014. What designers talk about when they talk about context. Human–Computer Interaction 29, 5-6 (2014), 420–450.
[9]
N Bidargaddi, G Schrader, P Klasnja, J Licinio, and S Murphy. 2020. Designing m-Health interventions for precision mental health support. Translational psychiatry 10, 1 (2020), 222.
[10]
Melanie Birks, Ysanne Chapman, and Karen Francis. 2008. Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. J. Res. Nurs. 13, 1 (Jan. 2008), 68–75.
[11]
Ann Bonner, Sally Wellard, and Marie Caltabiano. 2010. The impact of fatigue on daily activity in people with chronic kidney disease. J. Clin. Nurs. 19, 21-22 (Nov. 2010), 3006–3015.
[12]
Timothy R Brick, James Mundie, Jonathan Weaver, Robert Fraleigh, and Zita Oravecz. 2020. Low-Burden Mobile Monitoring, Intervention, and Real-Time Analysis Using the Wear-IT Framework: Example and Usability Study. JMIR Form Res 4, 6 (June 2020), e16072.
[13]
Astrid D H Brys, Frank Stifft, Caroline M Van Heugten, Maurizio Bossola, Giovanni Gambaro, and Bert Lenaert. 2021. mHealth-based experience sampling method to identify fatigue in the context of daily life in haemodialysis patients. Clin. Kidney J. 14, 1 (Jan. 2021), 245–254.
[14]
Hsiu-Chi Chang, Yung-Ju Chang, Mark W Newman, and Chih-Hsin Lin. 2020. Combining participatory and ESM: A hybrid approach to collecting annotated mobility data. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.
[15]
Tabby Davies, Simon L Jones, and Ryan M Kelly. 2019. Patient perspectives on self-management technologies for chronic fatigue syndrome. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[16]
P A Desmond, G Matthews, and J Bush. 2001. Individual Differences in Fatigue and Stress States in Two Field Studies of Driving. Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 45, 23 (Oct. 2001), 1571–1575.
[17]
Paul Dourish. 2004. What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and ubiquitous computing 8 (2004), 19–30.
[18]
Michelle Dugas, Guodong Gordon Gao, and Ritu Agarwal. 2020. Unpacking mHealth interventions: A systematic review of behavior change techniques used in randomized controlled trials assessing mHealth effectiveness. Digit Health 6 (Jan. 2020), 2055207620905411.
[19]
Charlotte L Edwardson, Elisabeth A H Winkler, Danielle H Bodicoat, Tom Yates, Melanie J Davies, David W Dunstan, and Genevieve N Healy. 2017. Considerations when using the activPAL monitor in field-based research with adult populations. J Sport Health Sci 6, 2 (June 2017), 162–178.
[20]
Victoria Elliott. 2018. Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. Qualitative report 23, 11 (2018).
[21]
Guido Giunti, Octavio Rivera-Romero, Jan Kool, Jens Bansi, Jose Luis Sevillano, Anabel Granja-Dominguez, Guillermo Izquierdo-Ayuso, and Diego Giunta. 2020. Evaluation of More Stamina, a Mobile App for Fatigue Management in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol for a Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability Study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 9, 8 (Aug. 2020), e18196.
[22]
Suat Gonul, Tuncay Namli, Sasja Huisman, Gokce Banu Laleci Erturkmen, Ismail Hakki Toroslu, and Ahmet Cosar. 2019. An expandable approach for design and personalization of digital, just-in-time adaptive interventions. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 26, 3 (2019), 198–210.
[23]
Janet Grace, Alana Mendelsohn, and Joseph H Friedman. 2007. A comparison of fatigue measures in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & related disorders 13, 7 (2007), 443–445.
[24]
Luis Claudio Gubert, Cristiano André da Costa, and Rodrigo da Rosa Righi. 2020. Context awareness in healthcare: a systematic literature review. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 19, 2 (June 2020), 245–259.
[25]
Sahand Hajifar, Hongyue Sun, Fadel M Megahed, L Allison Jones-Farmer, Ehsan Rashedi, and Lora A Cavuoto. 2021. A forecasting framework for predicting perceived fatigue: Using time series methods to forecast ratings of perceived exertion with features from wearable sensors. Applied Ergonomics 90 (2021), 103262.
[26]
Deirdre M Harrington, Gregory J Welk, and Alan E Donnelly. 2011. Validation of MET estimates and step measurement using the ActivPAL physical activity logger. J. Sports Sci. 29, 6 (March 2011), 627–633.
[27]
Richard Harrison, Scott Chaiken, Donald Harville, Joseph Fischer, Dion Fisher, Jeff Whitmore, and AIR FORCE RESEARCH LAB BROOKS AFB TX HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS DIRECTORATE. 2008. The identification of fatigue resistant and fatigue susceptible individuals. The Identification of Fatigue Resistant and Fatigue Susceptible Individuals 8 (2008), 56–56.
[28]
Roisin SM Hegarty, Gareth J Treharne, Simon Stebbings, and Tamlin S Conner. 2016. Fatigue and mood among people with arthritis: Carry-over across the day.Health Psychology 35, 5 (2016), 492.
[29]
Shivayogi V Hiremath, Amir Mohammad Amiri, Binod Thapa-Chhetry, Gretchen Snethen, Mary Schmidt-Read, Marlyn Ramos-Lamboy, Donna L Coffman, and Stephen S Intille. 2019. Mobile health-based physical activity intervention for individuals with spinal cord injury in the community: A pilot study. PloS one 14, 10 (2019), e0223762.
[30]
Joyce Ho and Stephen S Intille. 2005. Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CHI ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 909–918.
[31]
Luis G Jaimes, Martin Llofriu, and Andrew Raij. 2014. A stress-free life: just-in-time interventions for stress via real-time forecasting and intervention adaptation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Body Area Networks (London, United Kingdom) (BodyNets ’14). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), Brussels, BEL, 197–203.
[32]
Sverker Johansson, Anders Kottorp, Kathryn A Lee, Caryl L Gay, and Anners Lerdal. 2014. Can the Fatigue Severity Scale 7-item version be used across different patient populations as a generic fatigue measure-a comparative study using a Rasch model approach. Health and quality of life outcomes 12, 1 (2014), 1–9.
[33]
Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö and Teija Vainio. 2010. Framing the Context of Use for Mobile HCI. IJMHCI 2, 4 (Oct. 2010), 1–28.
[34]
Kazi Sinthia Kabir, Stacey A Kenfield, Erin L Van Blarigan, June M Chan, and Jason Wiese. 2022. Ask the Users: A Case Study of Leveraging User-Centered Design for Designing Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs). Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 2 (2022), 1–21.
[35]
Julie A Kientz and Hyewon Suh. 2018. Understanding and Assessing the User Burden of Urden of Mobile Apps. GetMobile: Mobile Comp. and Comm. 21, 4 (Feb. 2018), 5–7.
[36]
Predrag Klasnja, Eric B Hekler, Saul Shiffman, Audrey Boruvka, Daniel Almirall, Ambuj Tewari, and Susan A Murphy. 2015. Microrandomized trials: An experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions. Health Psychol. 34S (Dec. 2015), 1220–1228.
[37]
Jan-Niklas Kramer, Florian Künzler, Varun Mishra, Bastien Presset, David Kotz, Shawna Smith, Urte Scholz, and Tobias Kowatsch. 2019. Investigating Intervention Components and Exploring States of Receptivity for a Smartphone App to Promote Physical Activity: Protocol of a Microrandomized Trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 8, 1 (Jan. 2019), e11540.
[38]
Anna L Kratz, Susan L Murphy, Tiffany J Braley, Neil Basu, Shubhangi Kulkarni, Jenna Russell, and Noelle E Carlozzi. 2019. Development of a person-centered conceptual model of perceived fatigability. Qual. Life Res. 28, 5 (May 2019), 1337–1347.
[39]
F Künzler, V Mishra, Jann Kramer, D Kotz, and others. 2019. Exploring the State-of-Receptivity for mHealth Interventions: Supplementary Material. Age (2019).
[40]
Florian Künzler, Varun Mishra, Jan-Niklas Kramer, David Kotz, Elgar Fleisch, and Tobias Kowatsch. 2019. Exploring the State-of-Receptivity for mHealth Interventions. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 4 (Dec. 2019), 1–27.
[41]
D Kwasnicka, S Dombrowski, M White, and F Sniehotta. 2015. A qualitative data-prompted study of weight loss maintenance experiences using individual ecological data. Eur Health Psych (Dec. 2015), 484–484.
[42]
Dominika Kwasnicka, Stephan U Dombrowski, Martin White, and Falko F Sniehotta. 2015. Data-prompted interviews: Using individual ecological data to stimulate narratives and explore meanings. Health Psychol. 34, 12 (Dec. 2015), 1191–1194.
[43]
Dominika Kwasnicka, Stephan U Dombrowski, Martin White, and Falko F Sniehotta. 2019. ’It’s not a diet, it’s a lifestyle’: a longitudinal, data-prompted interview study of weight loss maintenance. Psychol. Health 34, 8 (Aug. 2019), 963–982.
[44]
Junghyun H Lee, Hyeonseok S Jeong, Soo Mee Lim, Han Byul Cho, Ji-Young Ma, Eun Ko, Jooyeon J Im, Sun Hea Lee, Sujin Bae, Yu-Jin Lee, 2013. Reliability and validity of the fatigue severity scale among university student in South Korea.Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry 20, 1 (2013).
[45]
Damien Lekkas, George D Price, and Nicholas C Jacobson. 2022. Using smartphone app use and lagged-ensemble machine learning for the prediction of work fatigue and boredom. Computers in human behavior 127 (2022), 107029.
[46]
Ian Li, Anind K Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2012. Using context to reveal factors that affect physical activity. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 19, 1 (2012), 1–21.
[47]
Jana Mäcken, Marie Wiegand, Mathias Müller, Alexander Krawinkel, and Michael Linnebank. 2021. A Mobile App for Measuring Real Time Fatigue in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Introducing the Fimo Health App. Brain Sci 11, 9 (Sept. 2021).
[48]
Elise Martin, Antonio Di Meglio, Cecile Charles, Arlindo Ferreira, Arnauld Gbenou, Marine Blond, Benoit Fagnou, Johanna Arvis, Barbara Pistilli, Mahasti Saghatchian, and Ines Vaz Luis. 2021. Use of mHealth to Increase Physical Activity Among Breast Cancer Survivors With Fatigue: Qualitative Exploration. JMIR Cancer 7, 1 (March 2021), e23927.
[49]
Gerald Matthews, Paula A Desmond, and Edward M Hitchcock. 2017. Dimensional models of fatigue. In The handbook of operator fatigue. CRC Press, 139–154.
[50]
Mario Gennaro Mazza, Mariagrazia Palladini, Gaia Villa, Rebecca De Lorenzo, Patrizia Rovere Querini, and Francesco Benedetti. 2022. Prevalence, trajectory over time, and risk factor of post-COVID-19 fatigue. J. Psychiatr. Res. 155 (Nov. 2022), 112–119.
[51]
Varun Mishra. 2019. From sensing to intervention for mental and behavioral health. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (London, United Kingdom) (UbiComp/ISWC ’19 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 388–392.
[52]
Varun Mishra, Florian Künzler, Jan-Niklas Kramer, Elgar Fleisch, Tobias Kowatsch, and David Kotz. 2021. Detecting Receptivity for mHealth Interventions in the Natural Environment. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 5, 2 (June 2021).
[53]
Inbal Nahum-Shani, David W Wetter, and Susan A Murphy. 2023. Chapter 7 - Adapting just-in-time interventions to vulnerability and receptivity: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In Digital Therapeutics for Mental Health and Addiction, Nicholas Jacobson, Lisa Marsch, and Tobias Kowatsch (Eds.). Academic Press, 77–87.
[54]
Ada Ng, Ashley Marie Walker, Laurie Wakschlag, Nabil Alshurafa, and Madhu Reddy. 2022. Understanding Self-Tracked Data from Bounded Situational Contexts. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1684–1697.
[55]
Department of Health & Human Services. 2023. Fatigue. https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/fatigue
[56]
Gaurav Paruthi, Shriti Raj, Natalie Colabianchi, Predrag Klasnja, and Mark W Newman. 2018. Finding the sweet spot (S) understanding context to support physical activity plans. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 1 (2018), 1–17.
[57]
Daniel J H Powell, Christina Liossi, Wolff Schlotz, and Rona Moss-Morris. 2017. Tracking daily fatigue fluctuations in multiple sclerosis: ecological momentary assessment provides unique insights. J. Behav. Med. 40, 5 (Oct. 2017), 772–783.
[58]
Mashfiqui Rabbi, Min Hane Aung, Mi Zhang, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2015. MyBehavior: automatic personalized health feedback from user behaviors and preferences using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 707–718.
[59]
Shriti Raj, Joyce M Lee, Ashley Garrity, and Mark W Newman. 2019. Clinical data in context: towards Sensemaking tools for interpreting personal health data. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 1 (2019), 1–20.
[60]
S Raj, K Toporski, A Garrity, J M Lee, and others. 2019. “ My blood sugar is higher on the weekends” Finding a Role for Context and Context-Awareness in the Design of Health Self-Management Technology. Proceedings of the 2019 (2019).
[61]
Soroush Saghafian and Susan A Murphy. 2021. Innovative Health Care Delivery: The Scientific and Regulatory Challenges in Designing mHealth Interventions. NAM Perspect 2021 (Aug. 2021).
[62]
Annina Seiler, Vanessa Klaas, Gerhard Tröster, and Christopher P Fagundes. 2017. eHealth and mHealth interventions in the treatment of fatigued cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychooncology 26, 9 (Sept. 2017), 1239–1253.
[63]
Moushumi Sharmin, Andrew Raij, David Epstien, Inbal Nahum-Shani, J Gayle Beck, Sudip Vhaduri, Kenzie Preston, and Santosh Kumar. 2015. Visualization of Time-Series Sensor Data to Inform the Design of Just-In-Time Adaptive Stress Interventions. Proc ACM Int Conf Ubiquitous Comput 2015 (Sept. 2015), 505–516.
[64]
Donna Spruijt-Metz, Eric Hekler, Niilo Saranummi, Stephen Intille, Ilkka Korhonen, Wendy Nilsen, Daniel E Rivera, Bonnie Spring, Susan Michie, David A Asch, 2015. Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: new opportunities in behavioral research. Translational behavioral medicine 5, 3 (2015), 335–346.
[65]
Huong Ly Tong, Juan C Quiroz, A Baki Kocaballi, Sandrine Chan Moi Fat, Kim Phuong Dao, Holly Gehringer, Clara K Chow, and Liliana Laranjo. 2021. Personalized mobile technologies for lifestyle behavior change: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Prev. Med. 148 (July 2021), 106532.
[66]
Alwin van Drongelen, Cécile Rl Boot, Hynek Hlobil, Jos Wr Twisk, Tjabe Smid, and Allard J van der Beek. 2014. Evaluation of an mHealth intervention aiming to improve health-related behavior and sleep and reduce fatigue among airline pilots. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 40, 6 (Nov. 2014), 557–568.
[67]
Alwin van Drongelen, Cécile R L Boot, Hynek Hlobil, Tjabe Smid, and Allard J van der Beek. 2016. Process evaluation of a tailored mobile health intervention aiming to reduce fatigue in airline pilots. BMC Public Health 16, 1 (Aug. 2016), 894.
[68]
Jane C Walsh and Jenny M Groarke. 2019. Integrating Behavioral Science With Mobile (mHealth) Technology to Optimize Health Behavior Change Interventions. Eur. Psychol. 24, 1 (Jan. 2019), 38–48.
[69]
Yanxia Wei, Pinpin Zheng, Hui Deng, Xihui Wang, Xiaomei Li, and Hua Fu. 2020. Design Features for Improving Mobile Health Intervention User Engagement: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, 12 (Dec. 2020), e21687.
[70]
Yara Q Wingelaar-Jagt, Thijs T Wingelaar, Wim J Riedel, and Johannes G Ramaekers. 2023. Comparison of effects of modafinil and caffeine on fatigue-vulnerable and fatigue-resistant aircrew after a limited period of sleep deprivation. Frontiers in Physiology 14 (2023).
[71]
Liwen Xu, Xiaohong Hao, Nicholas D Lane, Xin Liu, and Thomas Moscibroda. 2015. More with less: lowering user burden in mobile crowdsourcing through compressive sensing. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 659–670.
[72]
Xinghui Yan, Shriti Raj, Bingjian Huang, Sun Young Park, and Mark W Newman. 2020. Toward Lightweight In-situ Self-reporting: An Exploratory Study of Alternative Smartwatch Interface Designs in Context. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 4 (Dec. 2020), 1–22.
[73]
Xinghui Yan, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Runting Zhong, 2020. Leveraging walking performance to understand work fatigue among young adults: mixed-methods study. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 9, 4 (2020), e16376.
Index Terms
- Proposing a Context-informed Layer-based Framework: Incorporating Context into Designing mHealth Technology for Fatigue Management
Recommendations
Designing for context-aware health self-monitoring, feedback, and engagement
CSCW '11: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative workThere is a novel opportunity to increase awareness of health activities in a person's daily life. One way to do that is through context-aware self-monitoring. We explore design insights from field work and field testing different methods for self-...
Context-Informed Scheduling and Analysis: Improving Accuracy of Mobile Self-Reports
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMobile self-reports are a popular technique to collect participant labelled data in the wild. While literature has focused on increasing participant compliance to self-report questionnaires, relatively little work has assessed response accuracy. In this ...
Looking for the unusual: how older adults utilize self-tracking techniques for health management
PervasiveHealth '16: Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for HealthcareSelf-tracking applications for health management have become popular both in industry and in academia. Half of older adults in the U.S. track health indicators, but they rarely use technology for that purpose. We conduct a qualitative study to ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2024
3616 pages
ISBN:9798400705830
DOI:10.1145/3643834
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 July 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- University of Michigan Precision Health Initiative
Conference
DIS '24
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%
Upcoming Conference
DIS '25
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 168Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)168
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format