skip to main content
10.1145/3644116.3644200acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisaimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automated Quantification of Deformities in Congenital Radio-Ulnar SynostosisAutomated Method for quantifying CRUS

Published:05 April 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Congenital Radio-Ulnar Synostosis (CRUS) is complex and difficult to quantify. To assist the diagnosis of the CRUS, an automated quantification method of CRUS was studied. Twenty children with CRUS were included in the study. Half of these children suffered from unilateral deformities, while others suffered from bilateral deformities. The local coordinate systems were established based on the recognized forearm landmarks and bone shaft axes, and then the deformity angles were quantified automatically. The reliability was varified by comparing with “Global Truth” labeled by professional surgeons. T-test was conducted to analyse the influence of CRUS on the deformity angles and radio-ulnar length ratio. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to explore the relationship between the level of forearm fusion and the patient age. There is no statistically significant differences between the quantitative results obtained by automated methods and “Global Truth” according to the results of T-test analysis. By quantitative analysis on forearm with or without CRUS, more attention should be paid to the radial and dorsal and the internal rotation angle of the radius (RAR, DAR, and IRAR, respectively), as well as the internal rotation angle of ulna (IRAU). Appropriate plan for wedge osteotomy should be prespecified due to the short ulna, which is common in CRUS. The automated quantification method can assist clinical diagnosis and the quantification of CRUS, which is expected to guide the osteotomy preoperative planing.

References

  1. Ogino T, Hikino K. Congenital Radio-Ulnar Synostosis: Compensatory Rotation around the Wrist and Rotation Osteotomy. J Hand SurgeryBritish Eur Vol. 1987;12(2):173-178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Liu L, Liu C, Rong YB, Bai F, Chen SL. Radial Pronation Angle A Novel Radiological Evaluation Index of Congenital Proximal Radioulnar Synostosis. Ann Plast Surg. 2020; 84(3): S196-S201. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Yang C, Liu L, Wei Q, Bai F, Chen S. Quantitative Analysis of Deformity in Digital Model of Congenital Radioulnar Synostosis. Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(5):1348-1356. doi:10.1111/os.13701Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Rutkowski PT, Samora JB. Congenital Radioulnar Synostosis. JAAOS - J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29(13). https://journals.lww.com/jaaos/Fulltext/2021/07010/Congenital_Radioulnar_Synostosis.4.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Desteli EE, İmren Y, Erdoğan M, Sarısoy G, Coşgun S. Comparison of upper limb amputees and lower limb amputees: a psychosocial perspective. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014; 40(6):735-739. doi:10.1007/s00068-014-0418-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cleary JE, Omer GE. Congenital proximal radio-ulnar synostosis. J Bone Jt Surg. 1985; 67(4):539-545.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Adl W. Two-stage double-level rotational osteotomy in the treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008; 73(6):704-709.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sergio.Martínez-lvarez, Sergio.González-Codó, Vara-Patudo Isabel, María.Galán-Olleros, Fraga-Collarte Manuel, ngel.Palazón-Quevedo. Double-level Intraperiosteal Derotational Osteotomy for Congenital Radioulnar Synostosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022; 42(7):e756-e761. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002191Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hwang JH, Kim HW, Lee DH, Chung JH, Park H. One-stage rotational osteotomy for congenital radioulnar synostosis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015; 40(8):855-861. doi:10.1177/1753193415580066Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kanaya F, Ibaraki K. Mobilization of a congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis with use of a free vascularized fascio-fat graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(8):1186. doi:DOI:10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90064-XGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Funakoshi T, Kato H. The use of pedicled posterior interosseous fat graft for mobilization of congenital radioulnar synostosis: a case report. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2004; 13(2):230-234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen S, Liu L. Treatment of congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis using pedicle posterior interosseous perforator Adipofasical flaps. Chin J Plast. 2019; 35(9):881-886.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sakamoto S, Doi K, Hattori Y, Dodakundi C, Montales T. Modified osteotomy (Kanaya's procedure) for congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis with posterior dislocation of radial head. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014; 39(5):541-548. doi:10.1177/1753193413493386Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kanaya F, Kinjo M, Nakasone M, Okubo H, Miyagi W, Nishida K. Preoperative radius head dislocation affects forearm rotation after mobilization of congenital radioulnar synostosis. J Orthop Sci. Published online 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2022.10.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dumont CE, Thalmann R, Macy JC. The effect of rotational malunion of the radius and the ulna on supination and pronation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(7):1070. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.12593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Nakasone Motoko, Nakasone Satoshi, Kinjo Masaki, Murase Tsuyoshi, Kanaya Fuminori. Three-dimensional analysis of deformities of the radius and ulna in congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018; 43(7):739-743. doi:10.1177/1753193417753261Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Olesen TH, Torfing T, Overgaard S. MPR realignment increases accuracy when measuring femoral neck anteversion angle. Skeletal Radiol. 2013; 42(8):1119-1125. doi:10.1007/s00256-013-1639-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Automated Quantification of Deformities in Congenital Radio-Ulnar SynostosisAutomated Method for quantifying CRUS

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ISAIMS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Science
        October 2023
        1394 pages
        ISBN:9798400708138
        DOI:10.1145/3644116

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 April 2024

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate53of112submissions,47%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format