Abstract
Reversible data hiding (RDH) has developed various theories and algorithms since the early 1990s. The existing works involve a large amount of specialized knowledge, making it difficult for researchers, especially primary learners, to have a good grounding in the basic ideas. In this survey, we will review the mainstream RDH algorithms in uncompressed images and analyze their unique features to provide readers with an introduction to basic topics in RDH. We analyze the most effective RDH frameworks and their common extensions. The classic techniques, including lossless compression-based RDH, difference expansion, integer transform, histogram shifting, prediction-error expansion (PEE), and their extensions, will be reviewed first. Then, three currently popular investigated schemes, i.e., multiple histograms modification, pairwise PEE, and pixel-value-ordering, are presented in detail. Four aspects of these mainstream techniques are reviewed and analyzed, including the evolution of embedding frameworks, detailed technological features, extensions, and the current state of the art. Furthermore, we look forward the possible future research based on early-age motivations.
- [1] . 2004. Reversible watermark using the difference expansion of a generalized integer transform. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13, 8 (2004), 1147–1156.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [2] . 2005. Lossless generalized-LSB data embedding. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14, 2 (2005), 253–266.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [3] . 2022. Reversible data hiding for color images based on adaptive 3D prediction-error expansion and double deep q-network. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 8 (2022), 5055–5067.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [4] . 2022. Reversible data hiding for color images based on adaptive three-dimensional histogram modification. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 9 (2022), 5725–5735.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [5] . 2021. Adaptive pairwise prediction-error expansion and multiple histograms modification for reversible data hiding. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 31, 12 (2021), 4850–4863.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [6] . 2019. High-capacity reversible data hiding in encrypted images based on extended run-length coding and block-based MSB plane rearrangement. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 58 (2019), 334–344.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [7] . 2013. Reversible watermarking method based on asymmetric-histogram shifting of prediction errors. J. Syst. Soft. 86, 10 (2013), 2620–2626.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [8] . 2011. Improved embedding for prediction-based reversible watermarking. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 6, 3 (2011), 873–882.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [9] . 2007. Very fast watermarking by reversible contrast mapping. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 14, 4 (2007), 255–258.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [10] . 2014. Local-prediction-based difference expansion reversible watermarking. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23, 4 (2014), 1779–1790.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [11] . 2015. On local prediction based reversible watermarking. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24, 4 (2015), 1244–1246.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [12] . 2016. Adaptive pairing reversible watermarking. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 25, 5 (2016), 2420–2422.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [13] . 2022. High capacity lossless data hiding in JPEG bitstream based on general VLC mapping. IEEE Trans. Depend. Secure Comput. 19, 2 (2022), 1420–1433.Google Scholar
- [14] . 2008. Reversible image data hiding based on gradient adjusted prediction. EICE Electr. Exp. 5 (2008), 870–876.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [15] . 2021. Multiple histogram based adaptive pairwise prediction-error modification for efficient reversible image watermarking. Inf. Sci. 581 (2021), 515–535.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [16] . 2001. Invertible authentication. In Proceedings of the SPIE: Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents III, Vol. 4314 (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2001), 197–208.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [17] . 2020. Reversible watermarking in deep convolutional neural networks for integrity authentication. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2273–2280.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [18] . 2014. A high capacity reversible data hiding scheme based on generalized prediction-error expansion and adaptive embedding. Sign. Process. 98 (2014), 370–380.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [19] . 2019. A novel high-capacity reversible data hiding scheme for encrypted JPEG bitstreams. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 29, 12 (2019), 3501–3515.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [20] . 2020. Reversible data hiding in JPEG images based on negative influence models. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 15 (2020), 2121–2133.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [21] . 2021. Reversible data hiding based on dual pairwise prediction-error expansion. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 30 (2021), 5045–5055.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [22] . 2021. Reversible data hiding based on adaptive multiple histograms modification. IEEE Trans. Infor. Forens. Secur. 16 (2021), 3000–3012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [23] . 2017. Reversible data hiding using multi-pass pixel value ordering and prediction-error expansion. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 49 (2017), 351–360.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [24] . 2015. Reversible steganographic method using complexity control and human visual system. Comp. J. 58 (2015), 2583–2594.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [25] . 2018. Reversible data hiding in JPEG image based on DCT frequency and block selection. Sign. Process. 148 (
Jul. 2018), 41–47.Google ScholarCross Ref - [26] . 2019. Reversible data hiding in color image with grayscale invariance. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 29, 2 (2019), 363–374.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [27] . 2021. Reversible data hiding based on multiple histograms modification and deep neural networks. Sign. Process. Image Commun. 92 (2021), 116118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [28] . 2021. CNN prediction based reversible data hiding. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 28 (2021), 464–468.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [29] . 2022. Reversible data hiding by using CNN prediction and adaptive embedding. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 12 (2022), 10196–10208.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [30] . 2009. DE-based reversible data hiding with improved overflow location map. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 19, 2 (2009), 250–260.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [31] . 2013. An improved VLC-based lossless data hiding scheme for JPEG images. J. Syst. Softw. 86, 8 (2013), 2166–2173.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [32] . 2016. Reversible data hiding in JPEG images. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 26, 9 (2016), 1610–1621.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [33] . 2022. Grayscale-invariant reversible data hiding based on multiple histograms modification. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 9 (2022), 5888–5901.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [34] . 2019. Reversible data hiding based on reducing invalid shifting of pixels in histogram shifting. Sign. Process. 163 (2019), 238–246.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [35] . 2018. Reversible data hiding in encrypted three-dimensional mesh models. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 20, 1 (2018), 55–67.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [36] . 2011. A new histogram modification based reversible data hiding algorithm considering the human visual system. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 18 (2011), 95–98.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [37] . 2022. A reversible data hiding scheme in encrypted domain for secret image sharing based on chinese remainder theorem. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 4 (2022), 2469–2481.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [38] . 2008. A novel difference expansion transform for reversible data embedding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 3, 3 (2008), 456–465.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [39] . 2019. Reversible data hiding with automatic brightness preserving contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 29, 8 (2019), 2271–2284.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [40] . 2019. Skewed histogram shifting for reversible data hiding using a pair of extreme predictions. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 29, 11 (2019), 3236–3246.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [41] . 2021. Prediction error distribution with dynamic asymmetry for reversible data hiding. Expert Syst. Appl. 184 (2021), 115475.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [42] . 2006. Reversible image authentication based on watermarking. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. IEEE, 1321–1324.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [43] . 2022. Audio-lossless robust watermarking against desynchronization attacks. Sign. Process. 198 (2022), 108561.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [44] . 2021. PVO-based reversible data hiding using adaptive multiple histogram generation and modification. Sign. Process. Image Commun. 99 (2021), 116405.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [45] . 2013. General framework to histogram-shifting-based reversible data hiding. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22, 6 (2013), 2181–2191.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [46] . 2013. High-fidelity reversible data hiding scheme based on pixel-value-ordering and prediction-error expansion. Sign. Process. 93, 1 (2013), 198–205.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [47] . 2011. Efficient reversible watermarking based on adaptive prediction-error expansion and pixel selection. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20, 12 (2011), 3524–3533.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [48] . 2013. A novel reversible data hiding scheme based on two-dimensional difference-histogram modification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 8, 7 (2013), 1091–1100.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [49] . 2015. Efficient reversible data hiding based on multiple histograms modification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 10, 9 (
Sep. 2015), 2016–2027.Google ScholarDigital Library - [50] . 2020. Robust reversible audio watermarking based on high-order difference statistics. Sign. Process. 173 (2020), 107584.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [51] . 2008. Multilevel reversible data hiding based on histogram modification of difference images. Pattern Recogn. 41, 12 (2008), 3582–3591.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [52] . 2018. A low-distortion reversible watermarking for 2D engineering graphics based on region nesting. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 13, 9 (2018), 2372–2382.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [53] . 2023. Unauthorized AI cannot recognize me: Reversible adversarial example. Pattern Recogn. 134 (2023), 109048.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [54] . 2018. Separable reversible data hiding and encryption for HEVC video. J. Real-Time Image Process. 14 (2018), 171–182.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [55] . 2019. Convolutional neural networks-based stereo image reversible data hiding method. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 61 (2019), 61–73.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [56] . 2022. High-capacity reversible data hiding in encrypted 3D mesh models based on multi-MSB prediction. Sign. Process. 201 (2022), 108686.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [57] . 2016. A reversible data hiding scheme based on code division multiplexing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 11, 9 (2016), 1914–1927.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [58] . 2019. Adaptive error prediction method based on multiple linear regression for reversible data hiding. J. Real-Time Image Process. 16 (2019), 821–834.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [59] . 2013. Reversible data hiding in encrypted images by reserving room before encryption. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 8, 3 (2013), 553–562.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [60] . 2022. Fast expansion-bins-determination for multiple histograms modification based reversible data hiding. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 29 (2022), 662–666.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [61] . 2022. Reversible data hiding based on adaptive IPVO and two-segment pairwise PEE. Sign. Process. 198 (2022), 108577.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [62] . 2006. Reversible data hiding. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 16, 3 (2006), 354–362.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [63] . 2016. High-fidelity reversible data hiding based on pixel-value-ordering and pairwise prediction-error expansion. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 39 (2016), 12–23.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [64] . 2016. Improved PVO-based reversible data hiding: A new implementation based on multiple histograms modification. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 38 (2016), 328–339.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [65] . 2019. Improving pairwise PEE via hybrid-dimensional histogram generation and adaptive mapping selection. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 29, 7 (2019), 2176–2190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [66] . 2013. Reversible data hiding based on PDE predictor. J. Syst. Softw. 86, 10 (2013), 2700–2709.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [67] . 2014. Reversible data hiding using invariant pixel-value-ordering and prediction-error expansion. Sign. Process. Image Commun. 29, 7 (2014), 760–772.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [68] . 2013. Pairwise prediction-error expansion for efficient reversible data hiding. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22 (
Dec. 2013), 5010–5021.Google ScholarDigital Library - [69] . 2020. High capacity reversible data hiding based on multiple histograms modification. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 30, 8 (2020), 2329–2342.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [70] . 2020. Adaptive complexity for pixel-value-ordering based reversible data hiding. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 27 (2020), 915–919.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [71] . 2020. Separable robust reversible watermarking in encrypted 2D vector graphics. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 30, 8 (2020), 2391–2405.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [72] . 2012. Adaptive reversible data hiding scheme based on integer transform. Sign. Process. 92, 1 (2012), 54–62.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [73] . 2014. Improved PVO-based reversible data hiding. Digit. Sign. Process. 25 (2014), 255–265.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [74] . 2022. A semi-fragile reversible watermarking for authenticating 3D models in dual domains based on variable direction double modulation. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 12 (2022), 8394–8408.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [75] . 2021. A general region nesting-based semi-fragile reversible watermarking for authenticating 3D mesh models. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 31, 11 (2021), 4538–4553.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [76] . 2021. A recursive reversible data hiding in encrypted images method with a very high payload. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 23 (2021), 636–650.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [77] . 2022. Generic reversible visible watermarking via regularized graph fourier transform coding. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 31 (2022), 691–705.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [78] . 2020. Optimal reversible data hiding scheme based on multiple histograms modification. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 30, 8 (2020), 2300–2312.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [79] . 2019. New framework of reversible data hiding in encrypted JPEG bitstreams. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 29, 2 (2019), 351–362.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [80] . 2012. Lossless data hiding in JPEG bitstream. J. Syst. Softw. 85, 2 (2012), 309–313.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [81] . 2014. Reversible data hiding in encrypted JPEG bitstream. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 16, 5 (2014), 1486–1491.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [82] . 2018. Visible watermark removal scheme based on reversible data hiding and image inpainting. Sign. Process. Image Commun. 60 (2018), 160–172.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [83] . 2019. An efficient coding scheme for reversible data hiding in encrypted image with redundancy transfer. Inf. Sci. 487 (2019), 176–192.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [84] . 2019. Reversible data hiding based on multiple two-dimensional histograms modification. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 26, 6 (2019), 843–847.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [85] . 2021. Optimized lossless data hiding in JPEG bitstream and relay transfer-based extension. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 31, 4 (2021), 1380–1394.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [86] . 2016. Adaptive reversible data hiding by extending the generalized integer transformation. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 23, 1 (2016), 130–134.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [87] . 2022. High-capacity framework for reversible data hiding in encrypted image using pixel prediction and entropy encoding. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 9 (2022), 5874–5887.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [88] . 2015. Pixel-based pixel value ordering predictor for high-fidelity reversible data hiding. Sign. Process. 111 (2015), 249–260.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [89] . 2016. Reversible data hiding by adaptive group modification on histogram of prediction errors. Sign. Process. 125 (2016), 315–328.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [90] . 2009. Reversible watermarking algorithm using sorting and prediction. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 19, 7 (2009), 989–999.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [91] . 2016. Reversible data hiding: Advances in the past two decades. IEEE Access 4 (2016), 3210–3237.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [92] . 2018. Robust 2D engineering CAD graphics hashing for joint topology and geometry authentication via covariance-based descriptors. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 13, 4 (2018), 1018–1030.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [93] . 2020. Reversible data hiding based on a modified difference expansion for H.264/AVC video streams. Multimedia Tools Appl. 79 (2020), 28661–28674.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [94] . 2007. Expansion embedding techniques for reversible watermarking. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16, 3 (2007), 721–730.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [95] . 2003. Reversible data embedding using a difference expansion. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 13, 8 (2003), 890–896.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [96] . 2020. Multiple histograms-based reversible data hiding: Framework and realization. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 30, 8 (2020), 2313–2328.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [97] . 2019. Multiple histograms based reversible data hiding by using FCM clustering. Sign. Process. 159 (2019), 193–203.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [98] . 2017. Rate and distortion optimization for reversible data hiding using multiple histogram shifting. IEEE Trans. Cyber. 47, 2 (2017), 315–326.Google Scholar
- [99] . 2015. A novel reversible image data hiding scheme based on pixel value ordering and dynamic pixel block partition. Inf. Sci. 310 (2015), 16–35.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [100] . 2020. Independent embedding domain based two-stage robust reversible watermarking. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 30, 8 (2020), 2406–2417.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [101] . 2010. Efficient generalized integer transform for reversible watermarking. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 17, 6 (2010), 567–570.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [102] . 2021. High precision error prediction algorithm based on ridge regression predictor for reversible data hiding. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 28 (2021), 1125–1129.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [103] . 2023. Adaptive smoothness evaluation and multiple asymmetric histogram modification for reversible data hiding. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 90 (2023), 103732.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [104] . 2019. Dynamic improved pixel value ordering reversible data hiding. Inf. Sci. 489 (2019), 136–154.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [105] . 2021. Reversible data hiding method for multi-histogram point selection based on improved crisscross optimization algorithm. Inf. Sci. 549 (
Mar. 2021), 13–33.Google ScholarCross Ref - [106] . 2017. Optimal PPVO-based reversible data hiding. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 48 (2017), 317–328.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [107] . 2022. Adaptive reversible data hiding for JPEG images with multiple two-dimensional histograms. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 85 (2022), 103487.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [108] . 2022. General expansion-shifting model for reversible data hiding: Theoretical investigation and practical algorithm design. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 9 (2022), 5989–6001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [109] . 2022. Reversible data hiding with brightness preserving contrast enhancement by two-dimensional histogram modification. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 32, 11 (2022), 7605–7617.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [110] . 2015. Reversible image data hiding with contrast enhancement. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 22, 1 (2015), 81–85.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [111] . 2020. An improved reversible data hiding in encrypted images using parametric binary tree labeling. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 22, 8 (2020), 1929–1938.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [112] . 2022. Efficient PVO-based reversible data hiding by selecting blocks with full-enclosing context. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 5 (2022), 2868–2880.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [113] . 2021. Efficient reversible data hiding for JPEG images with multiple histograms modification. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 31, 7 (2021), 2535–2546.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [114] . 2019. Reversible data hiding based on pairwise embedding and optimal expansion path. Sign. Process. 158 (2019), 210–218.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [115] . 2023. A novel reversible data hiding scheme based on pixel-residual histogram. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 19, 1s (2023), 1–19.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [116] . 2022. Robust reversible watermarking in encrypted image with secure multi-party based on lightweight cryptography. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 1 (2022), 75–91.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [117] . 2023. RDH-DES: Reversible data hiding over distributed encrypted-image servers based on secret sharing. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 19, 1 (2023), 1–19.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [118] . 2022. Reversible data hiding in H.264/AVC videos based on hybrid-dimensional histogram modification. Multimedia Tools Appl. 81 (2022), 29305–29319.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [119] . 2016. Two-dimensional reversible data hiding-based approach for intra-frame error concealment in H.264/AVC. Sign. Process. Image Commun. 47 (2016), 369–379.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [120] . 2022. New CNN-based predictor for reversible data hiding. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 29 (2022), 2627–2631.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [121] . 2016. Reversible data hiding in medical images with enhanced contrast in texture area. Digital Sign. Process. 52 (2016), 13–24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [122] . 2022. A high visual quality color image reversible data hiding scheme based on B-R-G embedding principle and CIEDE2000 assessment metric. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 32, 4 (2022), 1860–1874.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [123] . 2019. Content-adaptive reversible visible watermarking in encrypted images. Sign. Process. 164 (2019), 386–401.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [124] . 2016. Inter-frame distortion drift analysis for reversible data hiding in encrypted H.264/AVC video bitstreams. Sign. Process. 128 (2016), 531–545.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [125] . 2019. Separable and reversible data hiding in encrypted images using parametric binary tree labeling. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 21, 1 (2019), 51–64.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [126] . 2020. Reversible data hiding in JPEG images with multi-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 30, 8 (2020), 2343–2352.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [127] . 2022. Reversible data hiding in encrypted images based on pixel prediction and bit-plane compression. IEEE Trans. Depend. Secure Comput. 19, 2 (2022), 992–1002.Google Scholar
- [128] . 2020. Reversible data hiding in encrypted images based on multi-MSB prediction and huffman coding. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 22, 4 (2020), 874–884.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [129] . 2022. Reversible data hiding with adaptive difference recovery for encrypted images. Inf. Sci. 584 (2022), 89–110.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [130] . 2022. Reversible data hiding with pairwise PEE and 2D-PEH decomposition. Sign. Process. 196 (2022), 108527.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [131] . 2022. Reversible data hiding based on multiple adaptive two-dimensional prediction-error histograms modification. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 7 (2022), 4174–4187.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [132] . 2023. Human visual system guided reversible data hiding based on multiple histograms modification. Comp. J. 66, 4 (2023), 888–906.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [133] . 2020. Location-based PVO and adaptive pairwise modification for efficient reversible data hiding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 15 (2020), 2306–2319.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [134] . 2022. Adaptive reversible data hiding with contrast enhancement based on multi-histogram modification. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 32, 8 (2022), 5041–5054.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [135] . 2013. Recursive histogram modification: Establishing equivalency between reversible data hiding and lossless data compression. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22, 7 (2013), 2775–2785.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [136] . 2011. Reversible data hiding in encrypted image. IEEE Sign. Process. Lett. 18, 4 (2011), 255–258.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [137] . 2012. Separable reversible data hiding in encrypted image. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 7, 2 (2012), 826–832.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [138] . 2013. Reversible data hiding with optimal value transfer. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 15, 2 (2013), 316–325.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [139] . 2021. Convolutional neural network-driven optimal prediction for image reversible data hiding. In Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP’21). IEEE, 1–6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [140] . 2019. A new reversible watermarking scheme using the content-adaptive block size for prediction. Sign. Process. 164 (2019), 74–83.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A Survey on Reversible Data Hiding for Uncompressed Images
Recommendations
Improved PVO-based reversible data hiding
An improved pixel-value-ordering (PVO) based reversible data hiding based on multiple histograms modification (MHM) is proposed.The new algorithm is considered in a framework that is based on MHM and parameterized by the selection of expansion bins.The ...
Reversible Data Hiding in Encrypted Images Based on Image Partition and Spatial Correlation
Digital Forensics and WatermarkingAbstractRecently, more and more attention is paid to reversible data hiding (RDH) in encrypted images because of its better protection of privacy compared with traditional RDH methods directly operated in original images. In several RDH algorithms, ...
High-fidelity reversible data hiding scheme based on pixel-value-ordering and prediction-error expansion
This paper presents a high-fidelity reversible data hiding scheme for digital images based on a new prediction strategy called pixel-value-ordering (PVO) and the well-known prediction-error expansion (PEE) technique. Specifically, a host image is first ...
Comments