skip to main content
10.1145/3647444.3647932acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicimmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

AIdriven Strategy for Predicting Equipment Failure in Manufacturing

Published: 13 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The manufacturing industry, which drives global economic activity, struggles with equipment failures. Due to inactivity, these failures can cause financial losses, safety risks, and production losses. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is crucial for predictive maintenance which is a foremost solution to this problem. This study investigates a novel AI-based approach to proactively predict manufacturing equipment breakdowns. To analyze the effectiveness of AI in predictive maintenance failure this paper compares Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Random Forest, XGBoost, and a new hybrid model that combines the features of CNN and Random Forest. Historical sensor readings, maintenance logs, and failure records were collected and examined for the research. Here used deep learning algorithm's CNN to automatically extract complex patterns, anomalies, and trends from the dataset. The study showed that the hybrid model had a accuracy rate of 99.08%. The positive result suggests industrial predictive maintenance strategies may advance.  This study can help industrial companies implement effective and efficient equipment failure prediction solutions. This study adds to predictive maintenance literature and shows how AI improves manufacturing process dependability and environmental friendliness. This study could change maintenance practices and usher in a new era of data-driven decision-making in the industrial industry as companies prioritize efficiency and downtime.

References

[1]
Meddaoui, M. Hain, and A. Hachmoud, “The benefits of predictive maintenance in manufacturing excellence: a case study to establish reliable methods for predicting failures,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 128, no. 7–8, pp. 3685–3690, 2023.
[2]
Y. Ran, X. Zhou, P. Lin, Y. Wen, and R. Deng, “A Survey of Predictive Maintenance: Systems, Purposes and Approaches,” vol. XX, no. Xx, pp. 1–36, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.07383
[3]
V. Khetani, Y. Gandhi, S. Bhattacharya, S. N. Ajani, and S. Limkar, “Cross-Domain Analysis of ML and DL: Evaluating their Impact in Diverse Domains,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng., vol. 11, pp. 253–262, 2023.
[4]
L. Spendla, M. Kebisek, P. Tanuska, and L. Hrcka, “Concept of predictive maintenance of production systems in accordance with industry 4.0,” SAMI 2017 - IEEE 15th Int. Symp. Appl. Mach. Intell. Informatics, Proc., pp. 405–410, 2017.
[5]
Bousdekis, K. Lepenioti, D. Apostolou, and G. Mentzas, “Decision making in predictive maintenance: Literature review and research agenda for industry 4.0,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 607–612, 2019.
[6]
E. Efeoğlu and G. Tuna, “Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance: Support Vector Machines and Different Kernel Functions,” J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 447–456, 2022.
[7]
T. P. Carvalho, F. A. A. M. N. Soares, R. Vita, R. da P. Francisco, J. P. Basto, and S. G. S. Alcalá, “A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 137, no. September, p. 106024, 2019.
[8]
Krupitzer, “A Survey on Predictive Maintenance for Industry 4.0,” 2020, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08224.
[9]
W. Luo, T. Hu, Y. Ye, C. Zhang, and Y. Wei, “A hybrid predictive maintenance approach for CNC machine tool driven by Digital Twin,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 65, no. September 2019, p. 101974, 2020.
[10]
G. A. Susto, A. Schirru, S. Pampuri, S. McLoone, and A. Beghi, “Machine learning for predictive maintenance: A multiple classifier approach,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 812–820, 2015.
[11]
W. Zhang, D. Yang, and H. Wang, “Data-Driven Methods for Predictive Maintenance of Industrial Equipment: A Survey,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2213–2227, 2019.
[12]
M. Compare, P. Baraldi, and E. Zio, “Challenges to IoT-Enabled Predictive Maintenance for Industry 4.0,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 4585–4597, 2020.
[13]
Ton, “Primavera: Synergising predictive maintenance,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 23, pp. 1–19, 2020.
[14]
N. G. Kuftinova, A. V. Ostroukh, O. I. Maksimychev, Y. E. Vasil'ev, and M. G. Pletnev, “Predictive Diagnostics and Maintenance of Industrial Equipment,” Russ. Eng. Res., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 158–161, 2022.
[15]
J. L. Leevy, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, R. A. Bauder, and N. Seliya, “Investigating the relationship between time and predictive model maintenance,” J. Big Data, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020.
[16]
P. S. Rao, S. I. Yaqoob, M. A. Ahmed, P. S. Abdinabievna, S. M. Yaseen, and M. Arumugam, “Integrated artificial intelligence and predictive maintenance of electric vehicle components with optical and quantum enhancements,” Opt. Quantum Electron., vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1–19, 2023.
[17]
O. Motaghare, A. S. Pillai, and K. I. Ramachandran, “Predictive Maintenance Architecture,” 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Comput. Res. ICCIC 2018, pp. 2–5, 2018.
[18]
B. Schmidt and L. Wang, “Cloud-enhanced predictive maintenance,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 99, no. 1–4, pp. 5–13, 2018.
[19]
S. T. March and G. D. Scudder, “Predictive maintenance: strategic use of IT in manufacturing organizations,” Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 327–341, 2019.
[20]
K. A. Nguyen, P. Do, and A. Grall, “Multi-level predictive maintenance for multi-component systems,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 144, pp. 83–94, 2015.
[21]
Stephan Matzka, “Predictive maintenance dataset.,” Machine Learning Repository. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/AI4I+2020+Predictive+Maintenance+Dataset.
[22]
Singh, U. P., Saxena, V., Kumar, A., Bhari, P., & Saxena, D. (2022, December). Unraveling the Prediction of Fine Particulate Matter over Jaipur, India using Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Management & Machine Intelligence (pp. 1-5).
[23]
Kumar, A., Bhari, P. L., Singh, U. P., & Saxena, V. (2022, December). Comparative Study of different Machine Learning Algorithms to Analyze Sentiments with a Case Study of Two Person's Microblogs on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Management & Machine Intelligence (pp.1-6).
[24]
Saxena, V., Saxena, D., & Singh, U. P. (2022, December). Security Enhancement using Image verification method to Secure Docker Containers. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Management & Machine Intelligence (pp. 1-5).
[25]
Chauhan, M., Malhotra, R., Pathak, M., & Singh, U. P. (2012). Different aspects of cloud security. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2, 864-869.
[26]
Mittal, A. K., Singh, U. P., Tiwari, A., Dwivedi, S., Joshi, M. K., & Tripathi, K. C. (2015). Short-term predictions by statistical methods in regions of varying dynamical error growth in a chaotic system. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 127, 457-465.
[27]
Singh, U. P., Mittal, A. K., Dwivedi, S., & Tiwari, A. (2015). Predictability study of forced Lorenz model: an artificial neural network approach. History, 40(181), 27-33.
[28]
Singh, U. P., Mittal, A. K., Dwivedi, S., & Tiwari, A. (2020). Evaluating the predictability of central Indian rainfall on short and long timescales using theory of nonlinear dynamics. Journal of water and Climate Change, 11(4), 1134-1149.
[29]
Singh, U., Pathak, M., Malhotra, R., & Chauhan, M. (2012). Secure communication protocol for ATM using TLS handshake. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), 2(2), 838-948.
[30]
Singh, U. P., & Mittal, A. K. (2021). Testing reliability of the spatial Hurst exponent method for detecting a change point. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 12(8), 3661-3674.
[31]
Tiwari, A., Mittal, A. K., Dwivedi, S., & Singh, U. P. (2015). Nonlinear time series analysis of rainfall over central Indian region using CMIP5 based climate model. Climate Change, 1(4), 411-417.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICIMMI '23: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Management & Machine Intelligence
November 2023
1215 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 May 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICIMMI 2023

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 28
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media