skip to main content
10.1145/3647444.3652470acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicimmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Development of a Robust Attack-aware Consensus Model for Context-Aware Blockchains

Published: 13 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Blockchain technologies have seen widespread adoption across various domains, necessitating a robust, efficient, and secure consensus mechanism that can operate under diverse conditions. This paper presents design of an innovative approach by integrating Proof of Temporal Trust (PoTT) and Proof of Spatial Trust (PoST) to formulate an "Attack-Aware Consensus Model for Context-Aware Blockchains (CAB)." Our novel framework addresses two critical dimensions in blockchain operations: temporal and spatial trustworthiness. PoTT evaluates miner performance based on historical metrics such as mining delay, energy consumption, and throughput, ensuring optimized resource allocation and efficiency. PoST, gauges the resilience of miners under security threats like Man-in-the-Middle (MITM), Sybil, Finney, and DDoS attacks. The fusion of these proofs of trust offers a holistic, resilient, and high-performance consensus mechanism that adapts to both the temporal and spatial context of blockchain operation.

References

[1]
K. Saadat, N. Wang and R. Tafazolli: AI-Enabled Blockchain Consensus Node Selection in Cluster-Based Vehicular Networks. In: IEEE Networking Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 115-119, (2023).
[2]
G. Praveen, S. P. Singh, V. Chamola and M. Guizani: Novel Consensus Algorithm for Blockchain Using Proof-of-Majority (PoM). In: IEEE Networking Letters, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 208-211, (2022).
[3]
S. Ma, S. Wang and W. -T. Tsai. Delay Analysis of Consensus Communication for Blockchain-Based Applications Using Network Calculus. In: IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1825-1829, (2022).
[4]
R. Bezuidenhout, W. Nel and J. M. Maritz: Permissionless Blockchain Systems as Pseudo-Random Number Generators for Decentralized Consensus. In: IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 14587-14611, (2023).
[5]
S. Islam, M. J. Islam, M. Hossain, S. Noor, K. -S. Kwak and S. M. R. Islam: A Survey on Consensus Algorithms in Blockchain-Based Applications: Architecture, Taxonomy, and Operational Issues. In: IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 39066-39082, (2023).
[6]
Truong Nguyen, Kyungbaek Kim: A survey about consensus algorithms used in Blockchain. In: Journal of Information Processing Systems 14(1) pp.101-128, (2018).
[7]
C. Xu, Y. Qu, T. H. Luan, P. W. Eklund, Y. Xiang and L. Gao: A Lightweight and Attack-Proof Bidirectional Blockchain Paradigm for Internet of Things. In: IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 4371-4384, (2022).
[8]
G. Yang, K. Lee, K. Lee, Y. Yoo, H. Lee and C. Yoo: Resource Analysis of Blockchain Consensus Algorithms in Hyperledger Fabric. In: IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 74902-74920, (2022).
[9]
J. Wan, K. Hu, J. Li and H. Su: AnonymousFox: An Efficient and Scalable Blockchain Consensus Algorithm. In: IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 24236-24252, (2022).
[10]
J. Abdella, Z. Tari, R. Mahmud, N. Sohrabi, A. Anwar and A. Mahmood: HiCoOB: Hierarchical Concurrent Optimistic Blockchain Consensus Protocol for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Systems. In: IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 3927-3943,(2023).
[11]
J. Gomes, S. Khan and D. Svetinovic: Fortifying the Blockchain: A Systematic Review and Classification of Post-Quantum Consensus Solutions for Enhanced Security and Resilience. In IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 74088-74100, (2023).
[12]
J. Xu, C. Hua and Y. Zhang: A Blockchain-Based Framework for Supervision of Livelihood Issues: Proof of Concept With Optimized Consensus. In: IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 73414-73434, (2023).
[13]
Reegu, Faheem Ahmad, Hafiza Abas, Yonis Gulzar, Qin Xin, Ali A. Alwan, Abdoh Jabbari, Rahul Ganpatrao Sonkamble, and Rudzidatul Akmam Dziyauddin: Blockchain-Based Framework for Interoperable Electronic Health Records for an Improved Healthcare System. In: Sustainability, 15, no. 8: 6337, (2023).
[14]
Z. Ai and W. Cui: A Proof-of-Transactions Blockchain Consensus Protocol for Large-Scale IoT. In: IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 7931-7943, (2022).
[15]
X. Zhang, R. Li and H. Zhao: A Parallel Consensus Mechanism Using PBFT Based on DAG-Lattice Structure in the Internet of Vehicles. In: IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 5418-5433, (2023).
[16]
P. Treleaven, R. Gendal Brown and D. Yang: Blockchain Technology in Finance. In: Computer, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 14-17, (2017).
[17]
Agbo, Cornelius C., Qusay H. Mahmoud, and J. Mikael Eklund: Blockchain Technology in Healthcare: A Systematic Review. In: Healthcare 7, no. 2: 56, (2019).
[18]
S. Kapse, M. Umalkar, A. Gajbe, K. Vrudhula, R. Gour and S. Telrandhe: Blockchain Based Solution for Secured Transmission of Examination Paper. In: IEEE 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Energy, Signal Processing and Cyber Security (iSSSC), Gunupur, Odisha, India, pp. 1-6, (2023).
[19]
Satoshi Nakamoto: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. (2008) https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper.
[20]
Moosavi, J., Naeni, L.M., Fathollahi-Fard, A.M. et al.: Blockchain in supply chain management: a review, bibliometric, and network analysis. In:Environ Sci Pollut Res, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13094-

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICIMMI '23: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Management & Machine Intelligence
November 2023
1215 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 May 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Blockchain Technology
  2. Consensus Algorithms
  3. Proof of Spatial Trust
  4. Proof of Temporal Trust
  5. Proof of Trust
  6. Quality of Service (QoS)

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICIMMI 2023

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 9
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media