skip to main content
10.1145/3647649.3647659acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicigpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

MA-Net: A MLP-based Attentional Deep Network for Segmentation of Liver Tumor Ablation Region from 2D Ultrasound Image

Published:03 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ultrasound image segmentation of ablation region of liver tumor has recently emerged as a significant tool for assessing tumor ablation surgery outcomes. However, existing segmentation methods are limited to the artifact of ultrasound images caused by hand-held transduces and speckle noise, leading to the background region likely being identified as the ablation region. Therefore, we introduce a MLP-based attentional network, MA-Net, and get accurate segmentation results. We present the hybrid attention cascading module to pay more attention to the ablation region to ensure accurate segmentation. In addition, we present an inverted residual multilayer perceptron module to avoid misrecognizing the ablation region as the background region. We evaluate our method on private and public dataset and achieve state-of-the-art performance.

References

  1. Zahra Aghababaie, Kevin Jamart, Chih-Hsiang Alexander Chan, Satya Amirapu, Leo K Cheng, Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel, Recep Avci, and Timothy R Angeli. 2020. A V-net based deep learning model for segmentation and classification of histological images of gastric ablation. In 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 1436–1439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Walid Al-Dhabyani, Mohammed Gomaa, Hussien Khaled, and Aly Fahmy. 2020. Dataset of breast ultrasound images. Data in brief 28 (2020), 104863.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wanyok Atisattapong, Chontida Chansri, Jidapa Somboonbadeebut, and Pakorn Songkaew. 2022. Identifying the Optimal Threshold for Image Segmentation Using PSO and Its Application to Chronic Wound Assessment. Journal of Image and Graphics 10, 3 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Onuralp Ergun, Mohammed Elshamy, and Eren Berber. 2022. Ablation technologies. Surgery Open Science (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kan He, Xiaoming Liu, Rahil Shahzad, Robert Reimer, Frank Thiele, Julius Niehoff, Christian Wybranski, Alexander C Bunck, Huimao Zhang, and Michael Perkuhn. 2021. Advanced deep learning approach to automatically segment malignant tumors and ablation zone in the liver with contrast-enhanced CT. Frontiers in Oncology 11 (2021), 669437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Rupinder Kaur and Er Garima Malik. 2014. An image segmentation using improved FCM watershed algorithm and DBMF. Journal of Image and Graphics 2, 2 (2014), 106–112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Waseem Khan. 2013. Image segmentation techniques: A survey. Journal of image and graphics 1, 4 (2013), 166–170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yasunori Minami, Masahiro Morita, Hirokazu Chishina, Tomoko Aoki, Masahiro Takita, Satoru Hagiwara, Hiroshi Ida, Kazuomi Ueshima, Naoshi Nishida, and Masatoshi Kudo. 2021. Can the Entire Ablative Hyperechoic Zone be Regarded as a Necrotic Lesion After Radiofrequency Ablation of the Liver?Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 47, 10 (2021), 2930–2935.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18. Springer, 234–241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Raluca-Maria Sandu, Iwan Paolucci, Simeon JS Ruiter, Raphael Sznitman, Koert P de Jong, Jacob Freedman, Stefan Weber, and Pascale Tinguely. 2021. Volumetric quantitative ablation margins for assessment of ablation completeness in thermal ablation of liver tumors. Frontiers in oncology 11 (2021), 623098.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. KK Thanammal, JS Jayasudha, RR Vijayalakshmi, and S Arumugaperumal. 2014. Effective histogram thresholding techniques for natural images using segmentation. Journal of Image and Graphics 2, 2 (2014), 113–116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeya Maria Jose Valanarasu, Poojan Oza, Ilker Hacihaliloglu, and Vishal M Patel. 2021. Medical transformer: Gated axial-attention for medical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part I 24. Springer, 36–46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeya Maria Jose Valanarasu and Vishal M Patel. 2022. Unext: Mlp-based rapid medical image segmentation network. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2022: 25th International Conference, Singapore, September 18–22, 2022, Proceedings, Part V. Springer, 23–33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Po-hung Wu, Mariajose Bedoya, Jim White, and Christopher L Brace. 2021. Feature-based automated segmentation of ablation zones by fuzzy c-mean clustering during low-dose computed tomography. Medical physics 48, 2 (2021), 703–714.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Zongwei Zhou, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee, Nima Tajbakhsh, and Jianming Liang. 2018. Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation. In Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support: 4th International Workshop, DLMIA 2018, and 8th International Workshop, ML-CDS 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 20, 2018, Proceedings 4. Springer, 3–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. MA-Net: A MLP-based Attentional Deep Network for Segmentation of Liver Tumor Ablation Region from 2D Ultrasound Image

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIGP '24: Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing
      January 2024
      480 pages
      ISBN:9798400716720
      DOI:10.1145/3647649

      Copyright © 2024 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format