skip to main content
10.1145/3647649.3647693acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicigpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Point Cloud Attribute Compression based on Adaptive Sampling and Quantization

Published:03 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the rapid development of 3D sensing technology, point cloud compression has become a research hotspot in the field of multimedia. Geometry Based Point Cloud Compression (G-PCC) developed by MPEG 3DG is one of the most important frameworks for point cloud compression. Recently, the Level of Detail (LOD) method for attribute data coding in G-PCC has received a lot of attention. In the prediction transformation and lifting transformation methods of G-PCC, the fixed sampling distance is used to divide the level of detail, and the same quantization step is used for the same level. However, point clouds usually have different texture complexity in different local regions. In this paper, we propose an adaptive sampling and quantization method based on the texture complexity of point cloud to improve the attribute compression performance. Experimental results show that the proposed method can achieve better coding performance with maintaining more detail information compared with that of the MPEG G-PCC reference software.

References

  1. X Wang, Y Mizukami, M Tada, and F Matsuno. Navigation of a mobile robot in a dynamic environment using a point cloud map[J]. Artificial Life and Robotics, 2021, 26: 10-20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. P. Placitelli and L. Gallo. Low-Cost Augmented Reality Systems via 3D Point Cloud Sensors. 2011 Seventh International Conference on Signal Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems, Dijon, France, 2011, pp. 188-192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Li Y, Ma L, Zhong Z, Liu F, Michael A, Cao D, Li J. Deep learning for lidar point clouds in autonomous driving: A review[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2020, 32(8): 3412-3432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Linh Tao, Trung Nguyen, Tinh Nguyen, Toshio Ito, and Tam Bui, "An Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithm with a Point-Based Approach for 3D Point Cloud Registration," Journal of Image and Graphics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-9, March 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang H, Huang Y, Zhang G, Rong Y. A novel method for dense point cloud reconstruction and weld seam detection for tubesheet welding robot. Optics & Laser Technology. 2023 Aug 1;163:109346.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. MPEG 3DG. G-PCC codec description, document w20351[R]. Online: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG07 MPEG, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Geiger A, Lenz P, Stiller C, and Urtasun R. Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2013;32(11):1231-1237. doi:10.1177/0278364913491297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. MPEG 3DG, “MPEG database,” https://mpegfs.int-evry.fr/ws-mpegcontent/MPEG-I/Part05-PointCloudCompression/, Accessed: Feb.2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang C, Florencio D, and Loop C. Point cloud attribute compression with graph transform[C]//2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2014: 2066-2070.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Y. Shao, Z. Zhang, Z. Li, K. Fan and G. Li. Attribute compression of 3D point clouds using Laplacian sparsity optimized graph transform. 2017 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2017, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/VCIP.2017.8305131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sandri G , De Queiroz R L, and Chou P A . Compression of 3D Point Clouds Using a Region-Adaptive Hierarchical Transform[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018, 25(8):3947-3956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wei L, Wan S, Wang Z, Ding X B, and Zhang W. Optimization Method for Level of Detail of Lossless Point Cloud Compression[J]. Hsi-An Chiao Tung Ta Hsueh/Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2021, 55(9): 88-96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Lu, W. Zhang, L. Yang and F. Yang, "Distribution-Driven Predictor Screening For Point Cloud Attribute Compression," 2022 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Bordeaux, France, 2022, pp. 2966-2970, doi: 10.1109/ICIP46576.2022.9897688Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. MPEG 3DG Group. A Progressive Quantization for LoD-based attribute Predicting Transform coding[R]. OnLine: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG7 input document m55859.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Graziosi D, Nakagami O, Kuma S, Zaghetto A, Suzuki T, and Tabatabai A. An overview of ongoing point cloud compression standardization activities: video-based (V-PCC) and geometry-based (G-PCC)[J]. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, 2020, 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. MPEG 3DG Group. Using L1 norm for nearest neighbour search in Prediction and Lifting schemes, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 input document m51011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Barburiceanu, R. Terebes and S. Meza, "Improved 3D Co-Occurrence Matrix for Texture Description and Classification," 2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC), Timisoara, Romania, 2020, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. MPEG 3DG, “MPEG-pcc-tmc13-v14.0,” http://mpegx.int-evry.fr/software/MPEG/PCC/TM/mpeg-pcc-tmc13/-/tree/release-v14.0/, Accessed: Feb.2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. MPEG 3DG, “Common test conditions for point cloud compression, document N19324,” ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WE 11 MPEG, Alpbach, Apr. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G. Bjøntegaard, Improvements of the BD-PSNR model, Standard VCEG-AI11, Berlin, Germany, Jul. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Q. Yin, Q. Ren, L. Zhao, W. Wang and J. Chen, "Lossless Point Cloud Attribute Compression with Normal-based Intra Prediction," 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB), Chengdu, China, 2021, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/BMSB53066.2021.9547021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Point Cloud Attribute Compression based on Adaptive Sampling and Quantization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIGP '24: Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing
      January 2024
      480 pages
      ISBN:9798400716720
      DOI:10.1145/3647649

      Copyright © 2024 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format