skip to main content
10.1145/3647649.3647704acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicigpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Improved Miniaturized X-Ray Material Discrimination System

Published:03 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

X-ray image material recognition is crucial in various fields such as medical, industrial, and security inspection. X-ray computed tomography (CT) and dual energy X-ray equipment basically meet this requirement, but they are limited in size, cost, and weight, and the recognition results are affected by various factors such as the thickness and density of the detected object. To overcome these limitations, we develop a miniaturized X-ray material identification system that improves the accuracy and efficiency of X-ray equipment material identification. Our system uses improved X-ray equipment to capture X ray images from two different angles, eliminating the influence of object thickness on material identification. We integrate the back projection algorithm into traditional deep learning frameworks and combine electron density information with deep neural networks to improve recognition accuracy. The experimental results show that our proposed miniaturized X-ray material recognition system and enhancement algorithm have excellent X-ray imaging performance and material recognition ability. Our research has a positive impact on the further development of X-ray image material recognition technology and related fields via using smaller and more portable devices, and has enormous application potential in various industries and fields.

References

  1. Willi A Kalender. 2006. X-ray computed tomography. Physics in Medicine & Biology 51(13), R29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Fernando W.A., Ilankoon I., Rabbani A., and Yellishetty M. 2020. Inter-particle fluid flow visualisation of larger packed beds pertaining to heap leaching using X-ray computed tomography imaging. Minerals Engineering, 151, 106334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Romadanov Ivan and Mike Sattarivand. 2020. Adaptive noise reduction for dual-energy x-ray imaging based on spatial variations in beam attenuation. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tongyuan Cui 2020. Material identification using dual particle interrogation. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, 954, 161827.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Junpeng Zhou 2023. Identification of coal and gangue based on R value method for dual-energy X-ray of Geant4 simulation. Environmental research, 115650.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Minggang Xu, xudong Bao. 2007. Object classification suppressed thickness effect based on pseudo dual energy X ray transmission imaging system. Chinese Journal of Electron Devices, 30(1):3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hye Ran Choi, Seong-Hyeon Kang, Seungwan Lee, Dong-Kyoon Han and Youngjin Lee. 2018. Comparison of image performance for three compression methods based on digital x-ray system. Phantom study, Optik 157, 197–202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Juliana Oliveira, Correia V, Enrico Sowade, 2018. Indirect x-ray detectors based on inkjet-printed photodetectors with a screen-printed scintillator layer. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Afrin Sultana, Alla Reznik, Karim S, and Rowlands J.A. 2008. Design and feasibility of active matrix flat panel detector using avalanche amorphous selenium for protein crystallography. Medical Physics35(10), 4324–4332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim D, Han J, Yun S, 2017. Aging of imaging properties of a CMOS flat-panel detector for dental cone-beam computed tomography. Journal of Instrumentation 12, P01005–P01005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Alle P, Emmanuel W, Dahaoui S, 2016. Comparison of CCD, CMOS and hybrid pixel x-ray detectors: Detection principle and data quality. Physica Scripta 91, 063001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ronghai Liu, Pengfei Ma, Tengfei Shi, 2016. Research on miniaturization of cable x-ray inspection equipment. Hebei Industrial Science and Technology 33, 379–384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shinya Takamuku, Tomoki Iwase, Koh Hosoda. 2008. Robust material discrimination by a soft anthropomorphic finger with tactile and thermal sense. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS ,3977–3982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. David Simons, Marc Kachelrie ß, and Heinz-Peter Schlemmer. 2014. Recent developments of dual-energy CT in oncology. European radiology 24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghaebi M, Tajik M and Azimirad R. 2022. Studying the effect of the scanned objects’ location on material discrimination in a dual-energy cargo inspection system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 510, 39–48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Xuewu Wang, J.-M Li, K.-J Kang, 2007. Material discrimination by high-energy X-ray dualenergy imaging. High Energy Physics & Nuclear Physics 31, 1076–1081.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Akie Nagao, Toshinori Yamazaki, Masami Torikoshi, 2019. Electron density measurement using multienergy X-rays from a conventional laboratory X-ray source, Applied Mechanics and Materials 888, 83–88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Khalil Moshkbar-Bakhshayesh. 2023. Developing a new approach for material discrimination using modular radial basis neural networks based on dual-energy X-ray radiography. Annals of Nuclear Energy 188, 109819.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hideyuki Tamura, Shunji Mori, and Takashi Yamawaki. 1978. Textural features corresponding to visual perception. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on 8, 460 – 473.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Robert Haralick, Kalaivani Shanmugam, and Ih Dinstein. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-3, 610–621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. NIPS2012, 1097–1105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gabriel Schwartz and Ko Nishino. 2013. Visual material traits: Recognizing per-pixel material context. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , 883–890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Andrey A. Dovganich, Alexander V. Khvostikov, Yakov A. Pchelintsev, Andrey A. Krylov, Yong Ding, and Mylene C. Q. Farias, Automatic Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods for Improving the Deep Learning Classification of Pulmonary X-ray Images, Journal of Image and Graphics, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 56-63, June 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ahmadabadi A. Adeli 2023. The application of artificial neural network in material identification by multi-energy photon attenuation technique. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheng-ping, Li. 2010. Application of X-ray digital imaging defect detection system in GIS equipment. High Voltage Apparatus.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Daniel Papp, Robert Polanek, Zsolt Lecz, 2016. A proposed 100-khz fs laser plasma hard X-Ray source at the ELI-ALPS facility. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science PP, 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lijun Zhao. 2013. Key technology and experimental research of radiography based on embedded. Hebei University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Andrew Cunningham. 2016. Design of a CCD camera for space surveillance. IEEE Aerospace Conference 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Yushi Wang, Lirui Yang and Weiwu Kong. 2011. X-ray multi-view security inspection technology and its application. Police Technology , 57–59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kun Qiao, Chaoyong Guo, and Dong Mao. 2011. An adaptive switching median filter algorithm to remove salt and pepper noise. Computer Applications and Software 28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Fei Xiao and Yungang Zhang. 2011. A comparative study on thresholding methods in wavelet-based image denoising. Procedia Engineering 15, 3998–4003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Haimiao Zhang, Yichuan Dong, and Qibin Fan. 2017. Wavelet frame-based Poisson noise removal and image deblurring. Signal Processing 137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Daniel Kipele and Kenedy A. Greyson, Poisson Noise Reduction with Nonlocal-PCA Hybrid Model in Medical X-ray Images, Journal of Image and Graphics, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 178-184, June 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Yann Lecun, Leon Bottou, Y. Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE 86, 2278 – 2324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Improved Miniaturized X-Ray Material Discrimination System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIGP '24: Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing
      January 2024
      480 pages
      ISBN:9798400716720
      DOI:10.1145/3647649

      Copyright © 2024 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format