skip to main content
10.1145/3647782.3647800acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Unified Theory of Technology Acceptance and Use for Chatbot Services in the Hotel Business

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Through the integration of the UTAUT 2 framework and the introduction of Digital Competence as a unique variable impacting acceptance, this study investigates guest acceptance of chatbots in hotel services. The study uses questionnaires for customers who have interacted with chatbots and focuses on five-star hotels in Jakarta. The paper highlights chatbots' importance in operational services by revealing their impact on visitor activities using data analysis using SEM PLS. The findings suggest that behavioral intention was strongly influenced by social influence and enabling settings, but not by performance expectancy, effort expectancy, or hedonic incentive. In contrast with the rejection of hedonic motivation, behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and digital competence favorably affected actual chatbot use. The results highlight chatbots as useful instruments for five-star hotels and point to wider uses in establishments such as gyms and sports centers. One suggestion is to use chatbot conversations to promote meeting spaces and accommodation packages on a frequent basis. The limitations of the study include its emphasis on technology and guest reception at five-star hotels; this suggests that more research on employee readiness for technology adoption in the broader hotel industry is warranted. This thorough analysis advances our knowledge of chatbot dynamics in the hospitality industry, offering practical advice for hotel managers and outlining potential research directions.

References

  1. C. Dilmegani, “Hospitality Chatbots: Everything You Need to Know in 2023,” https://research.aimultiple.com/hospitality-chatbot/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. Um, T. Kim, and N. Chung, “How does an intelligence chatbot affect customers compared with self-service technology for sustainable services?” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 12, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12125119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. U. Noman, “AI Chatbot for Hotels: Lower Costs, and Better Guest Experience,” https://botsify.com/blog/ai-chatbot-for-hotels-lower-costs-and-better-guest-experience/?amp=1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. M. Chang, L. W. Liu, H. C. Huang, and H. H. Hsieh, “Factors influencing Online Hotel Booking: Extending UTAUT2 with age, gender, and experience as moderators,” Information (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 9, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.3390/info10090281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C. Morosan and A. DeFranco, “Co-creating value in hotels using mobile devices: A conceptual model with empirical validation,” Int J Hosp Manag, vol. 52, pp. 131–142, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.10.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. V. T. Nguyen, L. T. Phong, and N. T. K. Chi, “The impact of AI chatbots on customer trust: an empirical investigation in the hotel industry,” Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality, vol. 18, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.1108/CBTH-06-2022-0131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Capsmart, “Smart technologies in hospitality: A case study about chatbot usage,” Oct. 2021. Accessed: Oct. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://capsmart.ulb.be/2021/10/11/smart-technologies-in-hospitality-effects-on-activity-work-design-and-employment-a-case-study-about-chatbot-usage/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Marikyan and S. Papagiannidis, “unified-theory-of-acceptance-and-use-of-technology,” In S. Papagiannidis (Ed), TheoryHub Book, pp. 1–16, 2023, Accessed: Oct. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://open.ncl.ac.uk / ISBN: 9781739604400Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Palacios-Marqués , “Application and extension of the UTAUTT model for determining behavioral intention factors in use of the artificial intelligence virtual assistants,” 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. H. Chu, C. M. Chao, H. H. Liu, and D. F. Chen, “Developing an Extended Theory of UTAUT 2 Model to Explore Factors Influencing Taiwanese Consumer Adoption of Intelligent Elevators,” Sage Open, vol. 12, no. 4, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1177/21582440221142209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. Nordhoff , “Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries,” Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav, vol. 74, pp. 280–297, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Hamzat and I. Mabawonku, “Influence of Performance Expectancy and Facilitating Conditions on use of Digital Library by Engineering Lecturers in universities in South-west, Nigeria,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilpracGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Nikolopoulou, V. Gialamas, and K. Lavidas, “Habit, hedonic motivation, performance expectancy and technological pedagogical knowledge affect teachers’ intention to use mobile internet,” Computers and Education Open, vol. 2, p. 100041, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100041.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. V. Venkatesh, S. M. Walton, and J. Y. L. Thong, “Quarterly Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1,” Mar. 2012. [Online]. Available: http://about.jstor.org/termsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. V. Venkatesh, J. Y. L. Thong, F. K. Y. Chan, P. J. H. Hu, and S. A. Brown, “Extending the two-stage information systems continuance model: Incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 21, no. 6, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00373. x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. G. B. D. and F. D. D. Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, “USER ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW,” IMIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/30036540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. B. Bervell, J. A. Kumar, V. Arkorful, E. M. Agyapong, and S. Osman, “Remodelling the role of facilitating conditions for Google Classroom acceptance: A revision of UTAUT2,” 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. W. Yu, C. M. Chao, C. F. Chang, R. J. Chen, P. C. Chen, and Y. X. Liu, “Exploring Behavioral Intention to Use a Mobile Health Education Website: An Extension of the UTAUT 2 Model,” Sage Open, vol. 11, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211055721.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. S. Rahman, M. Mannan, M. A. Hossain, and M. H. Zaman, “Patient's behavioral intention: public and private hospitals context,” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 349–364, 2018, doi: 10.1108/MIP-08-2017-0155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. E. Zarei, M. Arab, S. M. G. Tabatabaei, A. Rashidian, A. R. Forushani, and R. Khabiri, “Understanding patients’ behavioral intentions,” J Health Organ Manag, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 795–810, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. T. He, C. Zhu, and F. Questier, “Predicting digital informal learning: an empirical study among Chinese University students,” Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 19, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12564-018-9517-x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. J. Wulf, T. Mettler, and W. Brenner, “Using a digital services capability model to assess readiness for the digital consumer,” MIS Quarterly Executive, vol. 16, no. 3, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Hair, W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson, on Multivariate Data Analysis Joseph F . Hair Jr . William C . Black Eight Edition. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. F. Hair, M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins, and V. G. Kuppelwieser, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research,” European Business Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 106–121, 2014, doi: 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J. F. Hair, G. T. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) - Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian Ringle, Marko Sarstedt. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. H. Ghozali, I., & Latan, Partial Least Squares Concepts, Techniques and Applications using the SmartPLS 3.0 Program (Edition 2). Semarang: Undip., 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Unified Theory of Technology Acceptance and Use for Chatbot Services in the Hotel Business

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCMB '24: Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business
      January 2024
      235 pages
      ISBN:9798400716652
      DOI:10.1145/3647782

      Copyright © 2024 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format