Abstract
This study developed two distinct types of remote heritage virtual tourism programs, namely VR and AR. We utilized the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) model to understand how users’ perceptions of vividness and interactivity in VR and AR influence their sense of presence and perceived authenticity. Furthermore, we explored how the sense of presence and perceived authenticity further impact tourists’ responses, including satisfaction and behavioral intention. The findings indicate differences between VR and AR in several aspects. To elaborate, in the context of VR, vividness significantly influences perceived authenticity, an effect not found within the AR setting. Furthermore, interactivity impacts the sense of presence in AR, but this is not the case in VR. Within an AR setting, a user's sense of presence directly influences their level of satisfaction, yet no corresponding impact was found in VR. Even though the results show varying influences of presence on user intention in VR and AR, no significant differences were discovered. By gaining an in-depth understanding of tourists’ actual perceptions of VR and AR applications, this study provides insights for heritage site managers on how to employ VR and AR to enhance the efficiency of virtual heritage experiences for tourists.
- [1] . 2019. The role and dimensions of authenticity in heritage tourism. Tourism Management 74, 10 (2019), 99–109.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [2] . 2022. Integrating authenticity, well-being, and memorability in heritage tourism: A two-site investigation. Journal of Travel Research 61, 2 (2022), 378–393.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [3] . 2023. A construal level view of contemporary heritage tourism. Tourism Management 94, 2 (2023), 104648.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [4] . 2019. Existential authenticity and destination loyalty: Evidence from heritage tourists. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 12, 6 (2019), 84–94.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [5] . 2018. The role of augmented reality for experience-influenced environments: the case of cultural heritage tourism in korea. Journal of Travel Research 57, 5 (2018), 627–643.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [6] . 2003. Staged authenticity and heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 30, 3 (2003), 702–719.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [7] . 2015. The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: The case of a korean theme park. Tourism Management 49, 8 (2015), 75–86.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [8] . 2017. A multisensory virtual experience model for thematic tourism: A port wine tourism application proposal. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 6, 2 (2017), 103–109.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [9] . 2020. Emerging realm of 360-degree technology to promote tourism destination. Technology in Society 63, 11 (2020), 101411.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [10] . 2017. Value of augmented reality at cultural heritage sites: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 6, 2 (2017), 110–117.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [11] . 2022. Past, present, and future of virtual tourism-a literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 2, 2 (2022), 100085.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [12] . 2022. Welcome to stay-at-home travel and virtual attention restoration. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 51, 6 (2022), 207–217.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [13] . 2021. VR the world: Experimenting with emotion and presence for tourism marketing. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 46, 3 (2021), 160–171.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [14] . 2010. Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism. Tourism Management 31, 5 (2010), 637–651.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [15] . 2018. Effects of mixed-reality on players’ behaviour and immersion in a cultural tourism game: A cognitive processing perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 114, 6 (2018), 69–79.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [16] . 2018. User experience model for augmented reality applications in urban heritage tourism. Journal of Heritage Tourism 13, 1 (2018), 46–61.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [17] . 2018. Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from tourism. Tourism Management 66, 6 (2018), 140–154.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [18] . 2016. Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in museum. In Proceedings of the Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism. Cham. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 621–635.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [19] . 2021. X-reality technologies for museums: A comparative evaluation based on presence and visitors experience through user studies. Journal of Cultural Heritage 47, 1 (2021), 188–198.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [20] . 2018. When art meets tech: The role of augmented reality in enhancing museum experiences and purchase intentions. Tourism Management 68, 10 (2018), 127–139.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [21] . 2019. Effects of virtual reality on theme park visitors’ experience and behaviors: A presence perspective. Tourism Management 71, 4 (2019), 282–293.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [22] . 2019. The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. Journal of Business Research 100, 7 (2019), 547–560.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [23] . 2020. Virtual and augmented reality: Advancing research in consumer marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing 37, 3 (2020), 443–465.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [24] . 2020. 20 years of research on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism context: A text-mining approach. Tourism Management 77, 4 (2020), 104028.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [25] . 2011. Understanding the role of sense of presence and perceived autonomy in users’ continued use of social virtual worlds. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 16, 4 (2011), 492—510.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [26] . 2022. What is XR? Towards a framework for augmented and virtual reality. Computers in Human Behavior 133, 8 (2022), 107289.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [27] . 1995. Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Proceedings of the SPIE 2351, 11 (1995), 282—292.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [28] . 2023. Immersive interactive technologies and virtual shopping experiences: Differences in consumer perceptions between augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR). Telematics and Informatics 77, 2 (2023), 101936.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [29] . 2022. Virtual tourism atmospheres: The effects of pleasure, arousal, and dominance on the acceptance of virtual tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 53, 12 (2022), 143–152.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [30] . 2022. Immersive technology: A meta-analysis of augmented/virtual reality applications and their impact on tourism experience. Tourism Management 91, (2022), 104534.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [31] . 2018. Comparing virtual reality tourism to real-life experience: Effects of presence and engagement on attitude and enjoyment. Communication Research Reports 35, 5 (2018), 456–464.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [32] . 2020. Experiencing immersive virtual reality in museums. Information & Management 57, 5 (2020), 103229.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [33] . 2022. Using virtual reality for tourism marketing: A mediating role of self-presence. The Social Science Journal 59, 4 (2022), 657–670.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [34] . 2015. The effect of user's perceived presence and promotion focus on usability for interacting in virtual environments. Applied Ergonomics 50, 11 (2015), 126–132.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [35] . 2020. Memory of virtual experiences: Role of immersion, emotion and sense of presence. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 144, 12 (2020), 102506.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [36] . 2012. The influence of virtual presence: Effects on experienced cognitive load and learning outcomes in educational computer games. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 2 (2012), 648–658.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [37] . 2015. Authenticity, involvement, and image: Evaluating tourist experiences at historic districts. Tourism Management 50, 10 (2015), 85–96.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [38] . 2022. Interpreting the perceptions of authenticity in virtual reality tourism through postmodernist approach. Inf Technol Tourism 24, 1 (2022), 31–55.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [39] . 2021. Mobile augmented reality heritage applications: Meeting the needs of heritage tourists. Sustainability 13, 5 (2021), 2523.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [40] . 2023. Rethinking the consequences of postmodern authenticity: The case of a world cultural heritage in augmented reality. Current Issues in Tourism 26, 4 (2023), 617–631.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [41] . 2020. The impact of innovation and gratification on authentic experience, subjective well-being, and behavioral intention in tourism virtual reality: The moderating role of technology readiness. Telematics and Informatics 49, 6 (2020), 101349.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [42] . 2021. Do VR and AR versions of an immersive cultural experience engender different user experiences? Computers in Human Behavior 125, 12 (2021), 106951.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [43] . 2020. Desktop-based safety training using 360-degree panorama and static virtual reality techniques: A comparative experimental study. Automation in Construction 109, 1 (2020), 102969.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [44] . 2023. Authenticity in objects and activities: Determinants of satisfaction with virtual reality experiences of heritage and non-heritage tourism sites. Inf Syst Front 25, 3 (2023), 1219–1237.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [45] . 2020. Destination brand authenticity: What an experiential simulacrum! A multigroup analysis of its antecedents and outcomes through official online platforms. Tourism Management 77, 4 (2020), 104022.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [46] . 2021. The effect of augmented reality on purchase intention of beauty products: The roles of consumers’ control. Journal of Business Research 133, 9 (2021), 275–284.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [47] . 2017. Is augmented reality technology an effective tool for e-commerce? An interactivity and vividness perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing 39, 1 (2017), 89–103.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [48] . 2017. Chapter 12 - looking for the ultimate display: A brief history of virtual reality. In Proceedings of the Boundaries of Self and Reality Online. Jayne Gackenbach and Johnathan Bown (eds.), Academic Press, San Diego, 239–259.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [49] . 2021. How virtual reality influences travel intentions: The role of mental imagery and happiness forecasting. Tourism Management 87, 12 (2021), 104360.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [50] . 2019. Virtual reality presence as a preamble of tourism experience: The role of mental imagery. Tourism Management 74, 10 (2019), 55—64.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [51] . 2023. Does the selection of virtual reality video matter? A laboratory experimental study of the influences of arousal. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 54, 3 (2023), 152–165.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [52] . 2021. Post-COVID 19 Tourism: Will digital tourism replace mass tourism? Sustainability 13, 10 (2021), 5352.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [53] . 1997. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 6, 4 (1997), 355–385.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [54] . 2015. Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site. Computers in Human Behavior 50, 9 (2015), 588–599.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [55] . 2012. Enhancing the tourism experience through mobile augmented reality: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Engineering Business Management 4, 1 (2012), 10.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [56] . 2018. Embodiment of wearable augmented reality technology in tourism experiences. Journal of Travel Research 57, 5 (2018), 597–611.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [57] . 2012. Virtual destination image: Testing a telepresence model. Journal of Business Research 65, 1 (2012), 29–35.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [58] . 2018. In virtuo: How user-driven interactivity in virtual tours leads to attitude change. Journal of Business Research 88, 7 (2018), 255–264.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [59] . 2018. Exploring the role of next-generation virtual technologies in destination marketing. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 9, 9 (2018), 138–148.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [60] . 2019. The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. Journal of Business Research 100, 7 (2019), 547—560.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [61] . 2006. User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 2 (2006), 91–97.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [62] . 1995. Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. In Proceedings of the Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA, 33–56.Google Scholar
- [63] . 2021. The role of virtual reality on information sharing and seeking behaviors. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 46, 3 (2021), 215–223.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [64] . 1997. A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 6, 6 (1997), 603–616.
DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library - [65] . 2009. Virtual experiences, physical behaviors: The effect of presence on imitation of an eating avatar. Presence 18, 8 (2009), 294–303.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [66] . 2011. An odyssey into virtual worlds: Exploring the impacts of technological and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products. MIS Quarterly 35, 3 (2011), 789—810.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [67] . 2013. Correlating the effects of flow and telepresence in virtual worlds: Enhancing our understanding of user behavior in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 1113–1121.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [68] . 2021. Virtual reality and tourism marketing: conceptualizing a framework on presence, emotion, and intention. Current Issues in Tourism 24, 11 (2021), 1505–1525.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [69] . 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 3 (1998), 225–240.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [70] . 2001. The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising 30, 3 (2001), 65–77.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [71] . 2007. Authenticity: What Consumers Really Want. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
- [72] . 1992. The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- [73] . 2022. A review of authenticity research in tourism: Launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research 92, 1 (2022), 103349.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [74] . 1999. Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research 26, 2 (1999), 349–370.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [75] . 2017. Socio-spatial authenticity at co-created music festivals. Annals of Tourism Research 63, 3 (2017), 1–11.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [76] . 2009. Sacred site experience: A phenomenological study. Annals of Tourism Research 36, 1 (2009), 64–84.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [77] . 2019. Why wilderness? Alienation, authenticity, and nature. Tourist Studies 19, 1 (2019), 3–22.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [78] . 2020. Experiential authenticity in heritage museums. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 18, 12 (2020), 100493.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [79] . 2009. SINCERITY AND AUTHENTICITY. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [80] . 2014. Heritage authenticities – a case study of authenticity perceptions at a danish heritage site. Journal of Heritage Tourism 9, 4 (2014), 285–298.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [81] . 2020. Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. Journal of Travel Research 59, 1 (2020), 69–89.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [82] . 2013. Rethinking traditional chinese culture: A consumer-based model regarding the authenticity of chinese calligraphic landscape. Tourism Management 36, 6 (2013), 99–112.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [83] . 2013. Does authenticity really affect behavior? The case of the strasbourg christmas market. Tourism Management 36, 6 (2013), 153–163.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [84] . 2018. Wilderness state of mind: Expanding authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research 73, 11 (2018), 62–70.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [85] . 2015. Why heidegger did not travel: Existential angst, authenticity, and tourist experiences. Annals of Tourism Research 52, 5 (2015), 60–71.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [86] . 2010. The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers’ purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research 36, 5 (2010), 838–856.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [87] . 2007. Touristic quest for existential authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research 34, 1 (2007), 181–201.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [88] . 1980. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 17, 4 (1980), 460–469.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [89] . 2001. Tourism image, evaluation variables and after purchase behaviour: inter-relationship. Tourism Management 22, 6 (2001), 607–616.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [90] . 2010. Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism Management 31, 1 (2010), 29–35.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [91] . 2014. Tourism destinations: Antecedents to customer satisfaction and positive word-of-mouth. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 23, 8 (2014), 833–864.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [92] . 2008. Visitors’ experience, mood and satisfaction in a heritage context: Evidence from an interpretation center. Tourism Management 29, 3 (2008), 525–537.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [93] . 2020. Motivations, emotions and satisfaction: The keys to a tourism destination choice. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 16, 6 (2020), 100332.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [94] . 2019. Virtual reality in tourism: A state-of-the-art review. Tourism Review 74, 3 (2019), 586–612.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [95] . 2019. Determinants of working holiday makers’ destination loyalty: Uncovering the role of perceived authenticity. Tourism Management Perspectives 32, 10 (2019), 100565.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [96] . 1977. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric 10, 2 (1977), 130–132.Google Scholar
- [97] . 2023. How perceived authenticity affects tourist satisfaction and behavioral intention towards natural disaster memorials: A mediation analysis. Tourism Management Perspectives 46, 3 (2023), 101085.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [98] . 2013. Exploring user acceptance of 3D virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing. Tourism Management 36, 6 (2013), 490–501.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [99] . 2007. How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions? Tourism Management 28, 4 (2007), 1115–1122.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [100] . 2001. Tourism image, evaluation variables and after purchase behaviour: Inter-relationship. Tourism Management 22, 6 (2001), 607–616.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [101] . 2022. Factors that influence virtual tourism holistic image: The moderating role of sense of presence. Sustainability 14, 1 (2022), 467.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [102] . 2021. Understanding memorable tourism experiences and behavioural intentions of heritage tourists. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 21, 9 (2021), 100621.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [103] . 2014. A further investigation of revisit intention: A multigroup analysis. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 23, 8 (2014), 815–832.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [104] . 1974. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US.Google Scholar
- [105] . 2021. Examining food festival attendees’ existential authenticity and experiential value on affective factors and loyalty: An application of stimulus-organism-response paradigm. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 48, 9 (2021), 264—274.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [106] . 2020. Effects of mobile augmented reality apps on impulse buying behavior: An investigation in the tourism field. Heliyon 6, 8 (2020), e04667.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [107] . 2020. Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. Journal of Travel Research 59, 1 (2020), 69–89.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [108] . 2018. The impact of experiential augmented reality applications on fashion purchase intention. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 48, 5 (2018), 433–451.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [109] J. van Baren and W. IJsselsteijn. 2004. Measuring presence: A guide to current measurement approaches. Measurement (2004), 1--86.Google Scholar
- [110] . 2018. The effects of body position on reflexive motor acts and the sense of presence in virtual environments. Computers & Graphics 71, 4 (2018), 35–41.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [111] . 2021. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys 54, 8 (2021), 163:1–163:37.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [112] . 2001. Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4, 2 (2001), 183–201.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [113] . 1992. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1, 1 (1992), 120–126.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [114] . 1998. A virtual environment task analysis workbook for the creation and evaluation of virtual art exhibits. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- [115] . 2016. When does virtual embodiment change our minds? Presence 25, 3 (2016), 222–233.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [116] . 2020. Does virtual reality attract visitors? The mediating effect of presence on consumer response in virtual reality tourism advertising. Inf Technol Tourism 22, 4 (2020), 537–562.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [117] . 2013. Tourism: A catalyst for existential authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research 40, 1 (2013), 176–190.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [118] . 2012. Performing heritage: Rethinking authenticity in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 39, 3 (2012), 1495–1513.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [119] . 2016. Heritage tourism in singapore chinatown: A perceived value approach to authenticity and satisfaction. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 33, 7 (2016), 981–998.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [120] . 2018. Deconstructing the internal structure of perceived authenticity for heritage tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 26, 12 (2018), 2134–2152.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [121] . 2015. A structural model of host authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research 55, 11 (2015), 28–45.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [122] . 2016. Exploring the implications of virtual reality technology in tourism marketing: An integrated research framework. International Journal of Tourism Research 18, 2 (2016), 116–128.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [123] Robert Vincent Hogg and Elliot A. Tanis. 2009. Probability and Statistical Inference. Pearson Educational International.Google Scholar
- [124] . 2018. Using skin conductance and facial electromyography to measure emotional responses to tourism advertising. Current Issues in Tourism 21, 15 (2018), 1761–1783.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [125] . 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6, 1 (1999), 1–55.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [126] . 2018. Virtual reality (VR) & augmented reality (AR) technologies for tourism and hospitality industry. IJET 7, 2.21 (2018), 156.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [127] . 2017. Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 38, 9 (2017), 81–95.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [128] . 2017. ‘Authentic but not too much’: Exploring perceptions of authenticity of virtual tourism. Inf Technol Tourism 17, 2 (2017), 145–159.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Differences in Heritage Tourism Experience between VR and AR: A Comparative Experimental Study Based on Presence and Authenticity
Recommendations
Comparative Study of HMD-based Virtual and Augmented Realities for Immersive Museums: User Acceptance, Medium, and Learning
Technologies like Head Mounted Display (HMD)-based Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) have made HMD-based immersive museums possible. To investigate the user acceptance, medium, and interaction experience for HMD-based immersive museums, an ...
Authenticity in Objects and Activities: Determinants of Satisfaction with Virtual Reality Experiences of Heritage and Non-Heritage Tourism Sites
AbstractVirtual Reality (VR) is becoming an increasingly important technology in a host of industries, including tourism. VR can provide virtual experiences before, during, or in lieu of real-world visits to tourism sites. Hence, providing authentic ...
AR/VR Strategy Considerations for Academic Computing Services
SIGUCCS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGUCCS Annual ConferenceAs higher education institutions take up augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) tools and applications, important choices and challenges arise in deciding how to approach the planning and design of infrastructure, spaces, and the services to be offered. ...
Comments