skip to main content
10.1145/3649165.3703623acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

"Data comes from the real world": A Constructionist Approach to Mainstreaming K12 Data Science Education

Published: 05 December 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Data science is emerging as a crucial 21st-century competence, influencing professional practices from citing evidence when advocating for social change to developing artificial intelligence (AI) models. For middle and high school students, data science can put formerly decontextualized subjects into real-world scenarios. Many existing curricula, however, lack authenticity and personal relevance for students. A critique of data science courseware cites the lack of "author proximity," in which students do not contribute to the data's production or see their personal experiences reflected in the data. This paper introduces a novel data science curriculum to scaffold middle and high school students in undertaking real-world data science practices. Through project-based learning modules, the curriculum engages students in investigating solutions to community-based problems through visualization and analysis of live sensor data and public data sets. Materials include formative assessments to help educators (especially those from non-math and computing backgrounds) measure their students' abilities to identify statistical patterns, critically evaluate data biases, and make predictions. As we pilot and co-design with teachers, we will look closely at whether the curriculum's resources can successfully support non-technical practitioners engaging in an integrated curriculum.

References

[1]
Anna Bargagliotti. 2020. Pre-K-12 guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education II (GAISE II). American Statistical Association.
[2]
Jeffrey A Burke, Deborah Estrin, Mark Hansen, Andrew Parker, Nithya Ramanathan, Sasank Reddy, and Mani B Srivastava. 2006. Participatory sensing. Presented at World Sensor Web Workshop, ACM SenSy, Boulder, CO (2006).
[3]
Andrea Bussani and Cinzia Comici. 2023. Thermal tide detection: A case study to introduce open data analysis in high school. The Physics Teacher, Vol. 61, 1 (2023), 68--70.
[4]
Clark A Chinn and William F Brewer. 1993. The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of educational research, Vol. 63, 1 (1993), 1--49.
[5]
Barbara Condliffe. 2017. Project-Based Learning: A Literature Review. Working Paper. MDRC (2017).
[6]
Aayushi Dangol and Sayamindu Dasgupta. 2023. Constructionist approaches to critical data literacy: A review. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference. 112--123.
[7]
Linda Darling-Hammond, Brigid Barron, P David Pearson, Alan H Schoenfeld, Elizabeth K Stage, Timothy D Zimmerman, Gina N Cervetti, and Jennifer L Tilson. 2015. Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. John Wiley & Sons.
[8]
Catherine D'Ignazio. 2017. Creative data literacy: Bridging the gap between the data-haves and data-have nots. Information Design Journal, Vol. 23, 1 (2017), 6--18.
[9]
Catherine D'Ignazio and Rahul Bhargava. 2018. Creative data literacy: A constructionist approach to teaching information visualization. (2018).
[10]
Catherine D'ignazio and Lauren F Klein. 2023. Data feminism. MIT press.
[11]
Richard Duschl. 2008. Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of research in education, Vol. 32, 1 (2008), 268--291.
[12]
Hanya Elhashemy, Robert Parks, David YJ Kim, Evan Patton, and Harold Abelson. 2023. Empowering Learners with a Low-Barrier Mobile Data Science Toolkit. MIT App Inventor (2023).
[13]
Data Science for Everyone. N/A. Data Science 4 Evreyone (DS4E). https://www.datascience4everyone.org/.
[14]
Paulo Freire. 2020. Pedagogy of the oppressed. In Toward a sociology of education. Routledge, 374--386.
[15]
Armand Ruiz Gabernet and J Limburn. 2017. Breaking the 80/20 rule: How data catalogs transform data scientists? productivity. IBM Cloud Blog (2017).
[16]
Engida Gebre. 2022. Conceptions and perspectives of data literacy in secondary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 53, 5 (2022), 1080--1095.
[17]
Lisa Hardy, Colin Dixon, and Sherry Hsi. 2022. From data collectors to data producers: Shifting students' relationship to data. In Situating Data Science. Routledge, 104--126.
[18]
Samantha Hautea, Sayamindu Dasgupta, and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2017. Youth perspectives on critical data literacies. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 919--930.
[19]
Margaret L Hilton and James W Pellegrino. 2012. Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
[20]
Ayaz Hyder and Andrew A May. 2020. Translational data analytics in exposure science and environmental health: A citizen science approach with high school students. Environmental Health, Vol. 19 (2020), 1--12.
[21]
Rotem Israel-Fishelson, Peter Moon, Rachel Tabak, and David Weintrop. 2024. Understanding the data in K-12 data science. Harvard Data Science Review, Vol. 6, 2 (2024).
[22]
Shiyan Jiang and Jennifer Kahn. 2020. Data wrangling practices and collaborative interactions with aggregated data. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, Vol. 15, 3 (2020), 257--281.
[23]
Shiyan Jiang, Victor R Lee, and Joshua M Rosenberg. 2022. Data science education across the disciplines: Underexamined opportunities for K-12 innovation., 1073--1079 pages.
[24]
Britney Johnson, Ben Rydal Shapiro, Betsy DiSalvo, Annabel Rothschild, and Carl DiSalvo. 2021. Exploring approaches to data literacy through a critical race theory perspective. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[25]
Jenna Laib. N/A. Slow Reveal Graphs: An Instructional Routine to Promote Sensemaking about Data. https://slowrevealgraphs.com/.
[26]
John Larmer, John R Mergendoller, and Suzie Boss. 2015. Gold standard PBL: Essential project design elements. Buck Institute for Education, Vol. 2 (2015).
[27]
Victor R Lee. 2024. Humanistic Pre-Service Data Science Teacher Education Across the Disciplines. In Improving Equity in Data Science. Routledge, 112--132.
[28]
Victor R Lee and Victoria Delaney. 2022. Identifying the content, lesson structure, and data use within pre-collegiate data science curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 31, 1 (2022), 81--98.
[29]
Victor R Lee, Joel Drake, Ryan Cain, and Jeffrey Thayne. 2021. Remembering what produced the data: Individual and social reconstruction in the context of a quantified self elementary data and statistics unit. Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 39, 4 (2021), 367--408.
[30]
Victor R Lee, Michelle Hoda Wilkerson, and Kathryn Lanouette. 2021. A call for a humanistic stance toward K--12 data science education. Educational Researcher, Vol. 50, 9 (2021), 664--672.
[31]
Richard Lehrer and Lyn English. 2018. Introducing children to modeling variability. International handbook of research in statistics education (2018), 229--260.
[32]
Eow Yee Leng, Roselan Baki, Rosnaini Mahmud, et al. 2010. Stability of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) for the use of Malaysian form one students in ICT literacy class. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 6, 3 (2010), 215--226.
[33]
Duri Long and Brian Magerko. 2020. What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--16.
[34]
M Lisette Lopez, Colette Roberto, Edward Rivero, Michelle Hoda Wilkerson, Michael Bakal, and Kris Gutiérrez. 2021. Curricular reorganization in the third space: A case of consequential reasoning around data.
[35]
Katie Makar and Andee Rubin. 2009. A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. Statistics education research journal, Vol. 8, 1 (2009), 82--105.
[36]
Audrey Martínez-Gudapakkam, Karen Mutch-Jones, and Jennifer Hicks. 2017. Formative Assessment Practices to Support Students who Struggle in Science. Science and Children, Vol. 55, 2 (2017), 88.
[37]
Peter F Moon, Rotem Israel-Fishelson, Rachel Tabak, and David Weintrop. 2023. The tools being used to introduce youth to data science. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference. 150--159.
[38]
Levels of Conceptual Understanding in Statistics (LOCUS). 2013. Filling in the A in the GAISE Framework with Assessments for Statistics in the Common Core State Standards. https://locus.statisticseducation.org/.
[39]
Stanford Graduate School of Education. N/A. Big Ideas for K10 Data Science. https://www.youcubed.org/data-big-ideas/#grade_8--10.
[40]
Maxine Pfannkuch, Dani Ben-Zvi, and Stephanie Budgett. 2018. Innovations in statistical modeling to connect data, chance and context. ZDM, Vol. 50 (2018), 1113--1123.
[41]
Thomas M Philip, Sarah Schuler-Brown, and Winmar Way. 2013. A framework for learning about big data with mobile technologies for democratic participation: Possibilities, limitations, and unanticipated obstacles. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 18 (2013), 103--120.
[42]
Prerna Ravi, Azra Ismail, and Neha Kumar. 2021. The pandemic shift to remote learning under resource constraints. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--28.
[43]
Andee Rubin. 2022. Learning to reason with data: How did we get here and what do we know? In Situating Data Science. Routledge, 154--164.
[44]
Emmanuel Schanzer, Nancy Pfenning, Flannery Denny, Sam Dooman, Joe Gibbs Politz, Benjamin S Lerner, Kathi Fisler, and Shriram Krishnamurthi. 2022. Integrated data science for secondary schools: Design and assessment of a curriculum. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education-Volume 1. 22--28.
[45]
Elisabeth Sulmont, Elizabeth Patitsas, and Jeremy R Cooperstock. 2019. Can you teach me to machine learn?. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer science education. 948--954.
[46]
Sherry Turkle and Seymour Papert. 1992. Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 11, 1 (1992), 3--33.
[47]
Alan Tygel and Rosana Kirsch. 2015. Contributions of Paulo Freire for a critical data literacy. In Proceedings of web science 2015 workshop on data literacy. 318--34.
[48]
Sarah Van Wart, Kathryn Lanouette, and Tapan S Parikh. 2022. Scripts and counterscripts in community-based data science: Participatory digital mapping and the pursuit of a third space. In Situating Data Science. Routledge, 127--153.
[49]
Lev Semenovich Vygotsky and Michael Cole. 1978. Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
[50]
Alyssa Friend Wise. 2022. Educating data scientists and data literate citizens for a new generation of data. In Situating Data Science. Routledge, 165--181.
[51]
Annika Wolff, Daniel Gooch, Jose J Cavero Montaner, Umar Rashid, and Gerd Kortuem. 2016. Creating an understanding of data literacy for a data-driven society. The Journal of Community Informatics, Vol. 12, 3 (2016).
[52]
YouCubed. 2022. Explorations in data science. YouCubed High School Data Science Course. https://hsdatascience.youcubed.org/.
[53]
James Yurkovich, Waseem Abbas, and Steve Yurkovich. 2023. Transcending the classroom using digital wearables. (2023).

Index Terms

  1. "Data comes from the real world": A Constructionist Approach to Mainstreaming K12 Data Science Education

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE Virtual 2024: Proceedings of the 2024 on ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference V. 1
      December 2024
      292 pages
      ISBN:9798400705984
      DOI:10.1145/3649165
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 05 December 2024

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. computational action
      2. k12 data science
      3. participatory data collection
      4. project-based learning
      5. sensors

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 112
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)112
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)55
      Reflects downloads up to 22 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Login options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media