skip to main content
10.1145/3650215.3650233acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlcaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Dive into Lexical Simplification with Pre-trained Model

Published:16 April 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Lexical Simplification (LS) targets the replacement of complex terms with semantically equivalent simpler versions. While traditional LS methods often produce imprecise candidates, contemporary techniques utilize BERT for context-aware replacements. Notably, simplification may require phrasal rather than word-to-word substitutions. Diverging from conventional methods, our approach enables phrase-based replacements, and We improved the masking method of the masked language model to make it more suitable for lexical simplification tasks, finally refined the candidate word ranking. Experimental results show our method exceeds standard benchmarks.

References

  1. Al-Thanyyan, A. M. Azmi. 2022. Automated Text Simplification: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 2. 2022, 1-36Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. K. Omelianchuk, V. Raheja, and O. Skurzhanskyi. 2021. Text Simplification by Tagging. In Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 11–25Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Pavlick and C. Callison-Burch. 2016. Simple PPDB: A Paraphrase Database for Simplification. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, 143-148Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Narayan and C. Gardent. 2014. Hybrid Simplification using Deep Semantics and Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland, 435-445Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. L. Cripwell, J. Legrand, and C. Gardent. 2022. Controllable Sentence Simplification via Operation Classification. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL. Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle, United States, 2091-2103Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. L. Vásquez-Rodríguez, M. Shardlow, and P. Przyby\La. 2021. Investigating Text Simplification Evaluation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 876-882Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Štajner, M. Franco-Salvador, and S. P. Ponzetto. 2017. Sentence Alignment Methods for Improving Text Simplification Systems. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 97-102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Paetzold and L. Specia. 2016. Understanding the Lexical Simplification Needs of Non-Native Speakers of English. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 717-727Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. T. Dadu, K. Pant, and S. Nagar. 2021. Text Simplification for Comprehension-based Question-Answering. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 1-10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Stajner. 2021. Automatic Text Simplification for Social Good: Progress and Challenges. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLPGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Sikka and V. Mago. 2022. A Survey on Text Simplification. arXivGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E. Sulem, O. Abend, and A. Rappoport. 2018. Semantic Structural Evaluation for Text Simplification. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, 685-696Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Przyby\La and M. Shardlow. 2020. Multi-Word Lexical Simplification. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. International Committee on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, 1435-1446Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. W. Coster and D. Kauchak. 2011. Simple English Wikipedia: A New Text Simplification Task. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oregon, USA, 665-669Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Qiang, Y. Li, Y. Zhu, Y. Yuan, and X. Wu. 2020. Lexical Simplification with Pretrained Encoders. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 8649-8656Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gustavo Paetzold and Lucia Specia. 2017. Lexical simplification with neural ranking. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers. 34–40Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sian Gooding and Ekaterina Kochmar. 2019. Recursive Context-Aware Lexical Simplification. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China, 4853–4863Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Dive into Lexical Simplification with Pre-trained Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICMLCA '23: Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computer Application
      October 2023
      1065 pages
      ISBN:9798400709449
      DOI:10.1145/3650215

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 April 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format