skip to main content
research-article

A 3D Feature-based Approach for Mapping Scaling Effects on Stone Monuments

Published:17 April 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Weathering effects caused by physical, chemical, or biological processes result in visible damage that alters the appearance of stones’ surfaces. Consequently, weathered stone monuments can offer a distorted perception of the artworks to the point of making their interpretation misleading. Being able to detect and monitor decay is crucial for restorers and curators to perform important tasks, such as identifying missing parts, assessing the preservation state, or evaluating curating strategies. Decay mapping, the process of identifying weathered zones of artworks, is essential for preservation and research projects. This is usually carried out by marking the affected parts of the monument on a two-dimensional (2D) drawing or picture of it. One of the main problems of this methodology is that it is manual work based only on experts’ observations. This makes the process slow and often results in disparities between the mappings of the same monument made by different experts. In this article, we focus on the weathering effect known as “scaling,” following the International Council on Monuments and Sites, International Scientific Committee for Stone (ICOMOS ISCS) definition. We present a novel technique for detecting, segmenting, and classifying these effects on stone monuments. Our method is user-friendly, requiring minimal user input. By analyzing 3D reconstructed data considering geometry and appearance, the method identifies scaling features and segments weathered regions, classifying them by scaling subtype. It shows improvements over previous approaches and is well received by experts, representing a significant step toward objective stone decay mapping.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Adamopoulos E., Rinaudo F., and Adamopoulou D.. 2021. Automatizing degradation mapping of ancient stelae by dual-band imaging and machine learning-based classification. In ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences VIII-M-1-2021 (2021), 916. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Akoğlu Kiraz Goze, Kotoula Eleni, and Simon Stefan. 2020. Combined use of ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) testing and digital technologies: A model for long-term condition monitoring memorials in historic Grove Street Cemetery, New Haven. J. Cult. Herit. 41 (2020), 8495. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Azimi Mohsen, Eslamlou Armin Dadras, and Pekcan Gokhan. 2020. Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State-of-the-art review. Sensors 20, 10 (2020). DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Barath Daniel and Matas Jiří. 2018. Graph-cut RANSAC. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 67336741.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Beckman Gustavo H., Polyzois Dimos, and Cha Young-Jin. 2019. Deep learning-based automatic volumetric damage quantification using depth camera. Autom. Construct. 99, March (2019), 114124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Delgado-Rodrigues José. 2015. Defining, mapping and assessing deterioration patterns in stone conservation projects. J. Cult. Herit. 16, 3 (2015), 267275. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Felzenszwalb Pedro F. and Huttenlocher Daniel P.. 2004. Efficient graph-based image segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 59, 2 (2004), 167181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Fiorucci Marco, Khoroshiltseva Marina, Pontil Massimiliano, Traviglia Arianna, Bue Alessio Del, and James Stuart. 2020. Machine learning for cultural heritage: A survey. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 13, May (2020), 102108. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Fitzner Bernd and Heinrichs Kurt. 2002. Damage index for stone monuments. In Protection and Conservation of the Cultural Heritage of the Mediterranean Cities, Galan E. and Zezza F. (Eds.). Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands, 315326.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Fitzner B., Heinrichs K., and Kownatzki R.. 1997. Weathering forms at natural stone monuments: Classification, mapping and evaluation/Verwitterungsformen an Natursteinbauwerken: Klassifizierung, Kartierung und Auswertung. Restor. Build. Monuments 3, 2 (1997), 105124. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/rbm-1997-0204Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Grilli Eleonora and Remondino Fabio. 2019. Classification of 3D digital heritage. Remote. Sens. 11, 7 (2019), 847.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Hatır Mehmet Ergün. 2020. Determining the weathering classification of stone cultural heritage via the analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy inference system. J. Cult. Herit. 44, July-August, (2020), 120134. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Hatır Mehmet Ergün, Barstüğan Mücahit, and İnce İsmail. 2020. Deep learning-based weathering type recognition in historical stone monuments. J. Cult. Herit. 45, September-October (2020), 193203. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Hatır M. Ergün, İnce İsmail, and Korkanç Mustafa. 2021. Intelligent detection of deterioration in cultural stone heritage. J. Build. Eng. 44, 12 (2021), 102690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] ICOMOS. 2008. Monuments and Sites XV—Illustrated Glossary on Deterioration patterns. ICOMOS International Scientific Committee for Stone.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] Kyriakaki-Grammatikaki S., Stathopoulou E. K., Grilli E., Remondino F., and Georgopoulos A.. 2022. Geometric primitive extraction from semantically enriched point clouds. Int. Arch. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 46, 2/W1 (2022), 291298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Li Jiajun, Wang Qian, Ma Jun, and Guo Jingjing. 2022. Multi-defect segmentation from façade images using balanced copy–paste method. Comput.-Aid. Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 37, 11 (2022), 14341449.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Li Shengyuan and Zhao Xuefeng. 2022. A performance improvement strategy for concrete damage detection using stacking ensemble learning of multiple semantic segmentation networks. Sensors 22, 9 (2022), 3341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Meklati Safia, Boussora Kenza, Abdi Mohamed El Hafedh, and Berrani Sid-Ahmed. 2023. Surface damage identification for heritage site protection: A mobile crowd-sensing solution based on deep learning. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 16, 2 (2023), 25:1–25:24. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Messaoudi Tommy, Véron Philippe, Halin Gilles, and Luca Livio De. 2018. An ontological model for the reality-based 3D annotation of heritage building conservation state. J. Cult. Herit. 29, January-February (2018), 100112. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Mishra Mayank. 2021. Machine learning techniques for structural health monitoring of heritage buildings: A state-of-the-art review and case studies. J. Cult. Herit. 47, January-February (2021), 227245. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Muñoz-Pandiella Imanol, Akoglu Kiraz, Bosch Carles, and Rushmeier Holly E.. 2017. Towards semi-automatic scaling detection on flat stones. In Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. 4958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Ohtake Y., Belyaev A., and Seidel H.. 2002. Mesh smoothing by adaptive and anisotropic Gaussian filter applied to mesh normals. In Vision, Modeling, and Visualization. IOS Press Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 203210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Pavoni Gaia, Giuliani Francesca, Falco Anna De, Corsini Massimiliano, Ponchio Federico, Callieri Marco, and Cignoni Paolo. 2020. Another brick in the wall: Improving the assisted semantic segmentation of masonry walls. In Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. The Eurographics Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Schnabel Ruwen, Wahl Roland, and Klein Reinhard. 2007. Efficient RANSAC for point-cloud shape detection. In Computer Graphics Forum, 26, May. Wiley Online Library, 214226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Stefani Chiara, Brunetaud Xavier, Janvier-Badosa Sarah, Beck Kévin, Luca Livio De, and Al-Mukhtar Muzahim. 2014. Developing a toolkit for mapping and displaying stone alteration on a web-based documentation platform. J. Cult. Herit. 15, 1 (2014), 19. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Sun Xianfang, Rosin Paul L., Martin Ralph, and Langbein Frank. 2007. Fast and effective feature-preserving mesh denoising. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput.r Graph. 13, 5 (2007), 925938.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. [28] Vedaldi Andrea and Soatto Stefano. 2008. Quick shift and kernel methods for mode seeking. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV ’08) Part IV 10. Springer, 705718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Wang Niannian, Zhao Qingan, Li Shengyuan, Zhao Xuefeng, and Zhao Peng. 2018. Damage classification for masonry historic structures using convolutional neural networks based on still images. Comput.-Aid. Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 33, 12 (2018), 10731089.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Wang Niannian, Zhao Xuefeng, Zhao Peng, Zhang Yang, Zou Zheng, and Ou Jinping. 2019. Automatic damage detection of historic masonry buildings based on mobile deep learning. Autom. Construct. 103, July (2019), 5366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Wang Niannian, Zhao Xuefeng, Zou Zheng, Zhao Peng, and Qi Fei. 2020. Autonomous damage segmentation and measurement of glazed tiles in historic buildings via deep learning. Comput.-Aid. Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 35, 3 (2020), 277291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Warke Patricia, Curran J. M., Turkington Alice, and Smith B. J.. 2003. Condition assessment for building stone conservation: A staging system approach. Build. Environ. 38, 9–10 (2003), 11131123. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A 3D Feature-based Approach for Mapping Scaling Effects on Stone Monuments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
        Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 17, Issue 2
        June 2024
        355 pages
        ISSN:1556-4673
        EISSN:1556-4711
        DOI:10.1145/3613557
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 April 2024
        • Online AM: 13 March 2024
        • Accepted: 8 February 2024
        • Received: 1 August 2023
        Published in jocch Volume 17, Issue 2

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)104
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text