skip to main content
10.1145/3652628.3652807acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicaiceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sustainable Role of AI Robots for EFL Learners: Strengths, Weaknesses and Proposals

Published: 23 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine how AI EFL (English as a foreign language) learning robots affected learners by analyzing the functions and user experience. For this purpose, data were collected from positive, medium and negative views of five selected robots with EFL learning functions of over 5000 reviews on JD.com. Findings mainly indicated three points. First, the AI robots for EFL learning mainly focus on children, and few ones are targeted at adults. Second, the most frequently mentioned key words/phrase by at least 10% of users of the five robots are appearance, picture book, sound effect, operation, sensitivity, function, freedom, workshop, and quality. Next, the main advantages of the product for English learning can be non-linguistic aspects such as learning interest motivation and visual health protection and opinions vary on the shortcomings. This study showed that the improvements need to be made mainly in four aspects, that is, combining the latest big data and voice technology to enhance interaction capabilities; increasing the breadth of users age, profession, etc. to meet the learning needs of different people; developing unique learning strategies and plans for individual users; and meeting the learning needs of different scenarios such as travelling, professional fields, language exams, etc. These results of the study have implications for the research and development of AI EFL learning robot and sustainable development of EFL learners.

References

[1]
Han, J.; Geng, X.; Wang, Q. 2021. Sustainable Development of University EFL Learners’ Engagement, Satisfaction, and Self-Efficacy in Online Learning Environments: Chinese Experiences. Sustainability, 13, 11655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111655.
[2]
Luan L, Hong J C, Cao M, 2020. Exploring the role of online EFL learners’ perceived social support in their learning engagement: a structural equation model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1855211.
[3]
Lake, R., and B. Dusseault. 2020. "Remote classes are in session for more school districts, but attendance plans are still absent." Retrieved May 11, 2023 from https://crpe.org/remote-classes-are-in-session-for-more-school-districts-but-attendance-plans-are-still-absent/.
[4]
Zhang X, Cui G. 2010. Learning beliefs of distance foreign language learners in China: A survey study[J]. System, 38(1): 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.003.
[5]
Jiang, Y., Li, X., Luo, H., Yin, S., & Kaynak, O. 2022. Quo vadis artificial intelligence?. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00022-8.
[6]
Han J. 2012. Robot assisted language learning [J]. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3): 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10125/442.
[7]
Huijnen, C.A.G.J., Lexis, M.A.S., Jansens, R. 2017. How to Implement Robots in Interventions for Children with Autism? A Co-creation Study Involving People with Autism, Parents and Professionals. J Autism Dev Disord 47, 3079–3096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3235-9.
[8]
Deloitte. Global Powers of Retailing. 2022. https://www2.deloitte.com/cn/en/pages/consumer-business/articles/global-powers-of-retailing-2022.html.
[9]
R R. 2019. Introduction to AI robotics. MIT press.
[10]
Zakos J, Capper L. 2008. CLIVE–an artificially intelligent chat robot for conversational language practice//Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87881-0.
[11]
Guizzo E. 2023. What Is a Robot? Top roboticists explain their definition of robot. https://robotsguide.com/learn/what-is-a-robot/.
[12]
Randall N. 2019. A survey of robot-assisted language learning (RALL). ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 9(1): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345506.
[13]
Lee S, Noh H, Lee J, 2011. On the effectiveness of robot-assisted language learning. ReCALL, 23(1): 25-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12325.
[14]
Wang Y H, Young S S C, Jang J S R. 2013. Using tangible companions for enhancing learning English conversation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2): 296-309. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.2.296.
[15]
Wu W C V, Wang R J, Chen N S. 2015. Instructional design using an in-house built teaching assistant robot to enhance elementary school English-as-a-foreign-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6): 696-714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.792844.
[16]
Hong Z W, Huang Y M, Hsu M, 2016. Authoring robot-assisted instructional materials for improving learning performance and motivation in EFL classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1): 337-349. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.19.1.337.
[17]
Gordon G, Spaulding S, Westlund J K, 2016. Affective personalization of a social robot tutor for children's second language skills//Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9914.
[18]
Schodde T, Bergmann K, Kopp S. 2017. Adaptive robot language tutoring based on Bayesian knowledge tracing and predictive decision-making//Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 128-136. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020222.
[19]
Kanda T, Hirano T, Eaton D, 2004. Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human–Computer Interaction, 19(1-2): 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2004.9667340.
[20]
You Z J, Shen C Y, Chang C W, 2006. A robot as a teaching assistant in an English class//Sixth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT'06). IEEE, 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2006.1652373.
[21]
Hung I C, Chao K J, Lee L, 2013. Designing a robot teaching assistant for enhancing and sustaining learning motivation. Interactive learning environments, 21(2): 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.705855.
[22]
Herberg J S, Feller S, Yengin I, 2015. Robot watchfulness hinders learning performance[C]//2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333620.
[23]
Gupta P, Harris J. 2010, How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective. Journal of business research, 63(9-10): 1041-1049. https://doi.org/j.jbusres.2009.01.015.
[24]
Falk T, Hammerschmidt M, Schepers J J L. 2010. The service quality-satisfaction link revisited: exploring asymmetries and dynamics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38: 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0152-2.
[25]
Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner K P, Walsh G, 2004. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1): 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073.
[26]
Bartneck, C. 2021. An introduction to ethics in robotics and AI. Springer Nature.

Index Terms

  1. Sustainable Role of AI Robots for EFL Learners: Strengths, Weaknesses and Proposals

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICAICE '23: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering
    November 2023
    1263 pages
    ISBN:9798400708831
    DOI:10.1145/3652628
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 May 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICAICE 2023

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 39
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media