skip to main content
10.1145/3653081.3653193acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiotaaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dynamic Safety Evaluation Method of Complex System Based on STAMP

Published:03 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

A dynamic safety evaluation method of complex systems based on STAMP theory is proposed to solve the safety problem of long-term storage of complex systems in this paper, considering the human-computer interaction effect in the process. Taking STAMP theory as the overall framework and STPA as the analysis method, the accident-causing factors of complex systems are analyzed to provide support for the dynamic evaluation of system safety.Then, the human factor part of complex systems is analyzed, and the CREAM-based human error rate calculation method is proposed.A dynamic evaluation method for task process safety is proposed, taking into account the failure rate of machine loop coupling as input, and the accident rate of the entire task is obtained.Finally,an example verification is conducted, and the results show that the accuracy of the accident rate calculated by the proposed method is improved by 32.1% compared with the accident rate calculated by only considering “machine”.

References

  1. Cheng W, Zhou G, Wang G. Psychological measurement and analysis on human unsafe behavior.China Safety Science Journal(CSSJ), 2009, 19(6):29. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK200906005.htm (In Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hong-Gang M A, Lai-Bin Z, Jian-Chun F. Study on the application of LEC to the risk assessment of deep-water drilling and completion operations.Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2011, 07(9):89-92.http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-LDBK201109020.htm (In Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Heng Z, Lian-Sheng X U, Jian W. A Bayesian Network for Safety Assessment in Harbor Production Systems.Port& Waterway Engineering, 2007. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYGC200704008.htm(In Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhang L, Wu X, Skibniewski M J, Bayesian-network-based safety risk analysis in construction projects.Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2014, 131(Nov.):29-39.DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ericson C A. Event Tree Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/0471739421.ch12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. XinhongL, Jingwen W, Guoming C. A machine learning methodology for probabilistic risk assessment of process operations: A case of subsea gas pipeline leak accidents.Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 165: 959-968.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.029.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Xu T, Wang H, Yuan T, BDD-Based Synthesis of Fail-Safe Supervisory Controllers for Safety-Critical Discrete Event Systems.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016. DOI:10.1109/TITS.2016.2515063.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Zhong L U, You-Chao S. Application Research on Markov Analysis in System Safety Assessment.Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2008. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-ZGMH200805013.htm(In Chinese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marmaras L N. A comparison of accident analysis techniques for safety-critical man-machine systems[J].International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2000.DOI:10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00022-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lei Z, Jianbo H U. Safety analysis of wheel brake system based on STAMP/STPA. Acta Aeronautica et AstronauticaSinica, 2017, 38 (1) :241-251. DOI:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chen Z, Hong D, Cui W. Resilience evaluation and optimal design for weapon system of systems with dynamic reconfiguration. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 237: 109409. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bin L, Qin Y, Mao L U.Study on prediction model of human factor failure probability based on CREAM.Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 7,46-50.http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-LDBK201207013.htm (In Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic Safety Evaluation Method of Complex System Based on STAMP

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IoTAAI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 5th International Conference on Internet of Things, Automation and Artificial Intelligence
      November 2023
      902 pages
      ISBN:9798400716485
      DOI:10.1145/3653081

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format