skip to main content
research-article

Material Mediation in Collaborative Activity

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The material qualities of technological mediators are vital to collaborative activity, but current paradigms for collaboration support leave the potential of material mediation largely untapped. The HCI literature addresses both material mediation for individuals and coordination between collaborators - but rarely does it discuss the more direct role of the material as standing between people: its communicative role. This paper unfolds a material/linguistic analysis of four empirical examples from previous work on collaborative writing to showcase how material qualities of both tools and the text-in-progress, used in both planned and improvised manners, help co-authors shift between levels of collaboration, from independent co-ordinated activity to highly collaborative co-constructive activity. On one hand, we see co-authors successfully collaborating through material means; on the other, we see frustrations resulting from limited material expressivity in current tools. This duality between the significance of material mediation and obstacles to drawing on its potential makes clear that our conception of materiality needs elaboration. We point to multimodality as one opportunity for this.

References

[1]
Mirzel Avdic, Susanne Bødker, and Ida Larsen-Ledet. 2021. Two Cases for Traces: A Theoretical Framing of Mediated Joint Activity. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 190 (April 2021), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449289
[2]
Jakob Bardram. 1998. Collaboration, Coordination and Computer Support: An Activity Theoretical Approach to the Design of Computer Supported CooperativeWork. Ph.D. Dissertation. Aarhus University. https://doi.org/10.7146/dpb.v27i533.7062
[3]
Jakob E. Bardram and Steven Houben. 2018. Collaborative Affordances of Medical Records. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 27, 1 (Feb. 2018), 1--36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017--9298--5
[4]
Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2000. Instrumental Interaction: An Interaction Model for Designing post-WIMP User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands) (CHI '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 446--453. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332473
[5]
Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Susanne Bødker, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2021. Generative Theories of Interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 28, 6, Article 45 (nov 2021), 54 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3468505
[6]
Olav Wedege Bertelsen and Susanne Bødker. 2003. Activity Theory. Vol. Chapter 11. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, 291--324.
[7]
Pernille Bjørn and Carsten Østerlund. 2014. Sociomaterial-Design: Bounding technologies in practice. Springer London.
[8]
Susanne Bødker. 1990. Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA.
[9]
Susanne Bødker. 1999. Computer applications as Mediators of Design and Use. WorkingPaper. Department of Computer Science, Aarhus University.
[10]
Susanne Bødker and Peter Bøgh Andersen. 2005. Complex Mediation. Hum. Comput. Interact. 20, 4 (2005), 353--402.
[11]
Susanne Bødker and Ellen Tove Christiansen. 2012. Poetry in motion: appropriation of the world of Apps. In Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, ECCE '12, Phil Turner and Susan Turner (Eds.). New York, NY, USA, 78--84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2448136.2448152
[12]
Susanne Bødker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2011. The Human-Artifact Model: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Artifact Ecologies. Human-Computer Interaction 26, 4 (2011), 315--371. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2011.626709
[13]
Susanne Bødker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2016. Dynamics, Multiplicity and Conceptual Blends in HCI. In CHI '16. New York, NY, USA, 2538--2548. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858530
[14]
Susanne Bødker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2016. Dynamics, Multiplicity and Conceptual Blends in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2538--2548. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858530
[15]
Nikolaj Gandrup Borchorst and Susanne Bødker. 2011. ?You probably shouldn't give them too much information" -- Supporting Citizen-Government Collaboration. In ECSCW 2011, S. Bødker, N. O. Bouvin, W. Lutters, V. Wulf, and L. Ciolfi (Eds.). Springer London, London, United Kingdom, 173--192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0--85729--913-0_10
[16]
Marie-Luce Bourguet. 2003. Designing and Prototyping Multimodal Commands. In INTERACT. IOS Press.
[17]
Richard E. Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Sage.
[18]
Ellen Christiansen. 1996. Tamed by a Rose. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. https://books.google.dk/books?id=JeqcgPlS2UAC
[19]
M. Cole. 1996. Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.gl/books?id=6tvtAAAAMAAJ
[20]
Kevin Crowston and James Howison. 2003. The Social Structure of Open Source Software Development Teams. School of Information Studies - Faculty Scholarship (2003).
[21]
Laura Dabbish, Colleen Stuart, Jason Tsay, and Jim Herbsleb. 2012. Social Coding in GitHub: Transparency and Collaboration in an Open Software Repository. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CSCW '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1277--1286. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145396
[22]
Paul Dourish and Ken Anderson. 2006. Collective Information Practice: Exploring Privacy and Security as Social and Cultural Phenomena. Human-Computer Interaction 21 (09 2006), 319--342. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci2103_2
[23]
Elisa Giaccardi and Elvin Karana. 2015. Foundations of Materials Experience: An Approach for HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2447--2456. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702337
[24]
Antal Haans and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2006. Mediated social touch: a review of current research and future directions. Virtual Reality 9, 2 (2006), 149--159.
[25]
Christian Heath and Paul Luff. 1996. Documents and Professional Practice: ?Bad" Organisational Reasons for ?Good" Clinical Records. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (CSCW '96). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 354--363. https://doi.org/10.1145/240080.240342
[26]
William C. Hill, James D. Hollan, Dave Wroblewski, and Tim McCandless. 1992. Edit Wear and Read Wear. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Rebecca Grinter, Thomas Rodden, Paul Aoki, Ed Cutrell, Robin Jeffries, and Gary Olson (Eds.). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 3--9. https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142751
[27]
Eve Hoggan, Craig Stewart, Laura Haverinen, Giulio Jacucci, and Vuokko Lantz. 2012. Pressages: augmenting phone calls with non-verbal messages. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 555--562.
[28]
Stacy Hsueh, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2019. Deconstructing Creativity: Non-Linear Processes and Fluid Roles in Contemporary Music and Dance. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 203 (nov 2019), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359305
[29]
Jonas Ivarsson, Jonas Linderoth, and Roger Säljö. 2009. Representations in practices. Handbook of multimodal analysis (2009), 201--212.
[30]
Jonas Ivarsson and Roger Säljö. 2005. Seeing through the screen: Human reasoning and the development of representational technologies. Cognition, education and communication technology (2005), 203--222.
[31]
Mads Møller Jensen, Sarah Kristin Thiel, Eve Hoggan, and Susanne Bødker. 2018. Physical Versus Digital Sticky Notes in Collaborative Ideation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 27, 3--6 (Dec. 2018), 609--645. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10606-018--9325--1 16th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - The International Venue on Practice-Centred Computing and the Design of Cooperation Technologies (ECSCW) ; Conference date: 04-06--2018 Through 08-06--2018.
[32]
Mads Møller Jensen, Roman Rädle, Clemens N. Klokmose, and Susanne Bodker. 2018. Remediating a Design Tool: Implications of Digitizing Sticky Notes. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173798
[33]
Ida Larsen-Ledet. 2020. More Than Writing Text: Multiplicity in Collaborative Academic Writing. Ph.D. Dissertation. Aarhus University. https://pure.au.dk/portal/files/199867736/Thesis_More_Than_Writing_Text._Multiplicity_in_ Collaborative_Academic_Writing.pdf
[34]
Ida Larsen-Ledet and Marcel Borowski. 2020. "It Looks Like You Don't Agree": Idiosyncratic Needs and Practices in Collaborative Writing. In OZCHI'20: Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction (OzCHI '20). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441032 (in press).
[35]
Ida Larsen-Ledet and Henrik Korsgaard. 2019. Territorial Functioning in CollaborativeWriting: Fragmented Exchanges and Common Outcomes. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 28 (08 May 2019), 391--433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09359--8
[36]
Ida Larsen-Ledet, Henrik Korsgaard, and Susanne Bødker. 2020. Collaborative Writing Across Multiple Artifact Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI'20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376422
[37]
Paul M. Leonardi, Bonnie A. Nardi, and Jannis Kallinikos. 2012. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664054.001.0001
[38]
Jonas Löwgren and Erik Stolterman. 2004. Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. MIT Press.
[39]
Max Möllers and Jan Borchers. 2011. TaPS Widgets: Interacting with Tangible Private Spaces. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (Kobe, Japan) (ITS '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 75--78. https://doi.org/10.1145/2076354.2076369
[40]
Meredith Ringel Morris, Anthony Cassanego, Andreas Paepcke, Terry Winograd, Ann Marie Piper, and Anqi Huang. 2006. Mediating Group Dynamics through Tabletop Interface Design. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 5 (2006), 65--73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2006.114
[41]
Davide Nicolini, Jeanne Mengis, and Jacky Swan. 2012. Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross- Disciplinary Collaboration. Organization Science 23, 3 (2012), 612--629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0664 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
[42]
Kenton P. O'hara, Alex Taylor, William Newman, and Abigail J. Sellen. 2002. Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 56, 3 (2002), 269--305. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0525
[43]
Pavel Okopnyi, Oskar Juhlin, and Frode Guribye. 2022. Designing for Collaborative Video Editing. In Nordic Human- Computer Interaction Conference (Aarhus, Denmark) (NordiCHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546155.3546664
[44]
Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2007. Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies 28, 9 (2007), 1435--1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
[45]
James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2013. Electric Materialities and Interactive Technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 119--128. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470672
[46]
David Pinelle, Mutasem Barjawi, Miguel Nacenta, and Regan Mandryk. 2009. An Evaluation of Coordination Techniques for Protecting Objects and Territories in Tabletop Groupware. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2129--2138. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519025
[47]
Erica Robles and Mikael Wiberg. 2010. From materials to materiality: thinking of computation from within an Icehotel. Interactions 18, 1 (2010), 32--37.
[48]
Daniela K. Rosner. 2012. The material practices of collaboration. In CSCW. ACM, 1155--1164.
[49]
Wolff-Michael Roth and Alfredo Jornet. 2018. From Object-Oriented to Fluid Ontology: A Case Study of the Materiality of Design Work in Agile Software Development. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 27, 1 (feb 2018), 37--75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017--9297--6
[50]
Kjeld Schmidt and Dave W. Randall. 2016. Preface to the Special Issue on 'Reconsidering "Awareness" in CSCW'. Comput. Support. Cooperative Work. 25, 4--5 (2016), 229--233.
[51]
Kjeld Schmidt and Ina Wagner. 2002. Coordinative Artifacts in Architectural Practise. In COOP. IOS, 257--274.
[52]
Abigail J. Sellen and Richard H.R. Harper. 2003. The Myth of the Paperless Office. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
[53]
Pål Sørgaard. 1989. A Framework for Computer Supported Cooperative Work. DAIMI Report Series 17, 253 (Mar. 1989). https://doi.org/10.7146/dpb.v17i253.7609
[54]
Josh Tenenberg, Wolff-Michael Roth, and David Socha. 2016. From I-Awareness to We-Awareness in CSCW. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 25, 4--5 (oct 2016), 235--278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014--9215-0
[55]
Gordon Wells. 2002. The Role of Dialogue in Activity Theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity 9 (02 2002), 43--66. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0901_04
[56]
James V. Wertsch. 1997. Mind as Action. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195117530.001.0001
[57]
Mikael Wiberg, Hiroshi Ishii, Paul Dourish, Anna Vallgårda, Tobie Kerridge, Petra Sundström, Daniela Karin Rosner, and Mark Rolston. 2013. Materiality matters - experience materials. Interactions 20, 2 (2013), 54--57.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
CSCW
April 2024
6294 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3661497
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 April 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. activity theory
  2. collaboration
  3. material
  4. mediation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 210
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)210
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media