skip to main content
10.1145/3654446.3654498acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspcncConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Boundary Detector Network with Squeeze-and-Excitation Network for Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the rapid development of deep learning, remote sensing image interpretation using semantic segmentation has been widely used in various fields. Deep convolutional Neural network (DCNN) is an important tool for semantic segmentation. However, increasing the complexity of the network and deepening the neural network not only can improve the accuracy of the network, but also lead to the overfitting problem. Based on this point, this paper used the squeeze-and-excitation (SE) modules to optimize the network. SE modules are superimposed after each layer of the ResNet-101 network. This method not only improves network performance but does not lose small target information too much. In this experiment, RGB and nDSM multi-channels of high resolution remote sensing (RS) images with multi-semantic information are used. Experimental results show that the accuracy of the proposed method in the training set and verification set can reach 98.11% and 98.45%, and the model is in continuous convergence. OA, Precision, Recall, F1 and MIOU can reach 85.73%, 84.64%, 85.76%, 85.67%, and 75.47% respectively.

References

  1. Liu J H. 2011. Research on adaptive segmentation method of high spatial resolution remote sensing image. Fuzhou University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zheng C, Zhang Y, Wang L. 2017. Semantic segmentation of remote sensing imagery using an object-based Markov random field model with auxiliary label fields. IEEE T Geosci Remote, 55, 5, (May 2017), 3015-3028. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2658731.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Camps-Valls G, Bruzzone L. 2009. Kernel Methods for Remote Sensing Data Analysis Idex.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tang YQ. 2013. Object-oriented multi-feature change detection for high resolution image cities. Wuhan University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zheng C, Chen Y, Shao J, 2022. An MRF-based multigranularity edge-preservation optimization for semantic segmentation of remote sensing images. IEEE Geosci Remote S, 19, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3058939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Zheng C, Zhang Y, Wang L. 2021. Multigranularity Multiclass-Layer Markov Random Field Model for Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images. IEEE T Geosci Remote, 59, 12, (December 2021), 10555-10574. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3033293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Paul A, Mukherjee D P, Das P, 2018. Improved Random Forest for Classification. IEEE T Image Process, 27, 8, (August 2018), 4012-4024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2018.2834830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bovolo F, Bruzzone L, Marconcini M, 2007. A Novel Context-Sensitive SVM for Classification of Remote Sensing Images. In 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Denver, CO, USA, 2006, 2498-2501. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2006.646.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Yuan XH, Shi JF, Gu LC. 2021. A review of deep learning methods for semantic segmentation of remote sensing imagery. Expert Syst Appl, 169, 6214, (May 2021), 114417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Simonyan K, Zisserman A. 2014. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv:1409.1556.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen HY, Sun ZL, Kong W. 2020. Semantic Image Segmentation Based on Fusion of Deep Neural Networks and Atrous Convolution. Journal of Chinese Computer systems. 41(01):166-170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yang R, Zheng C, Wang L, Zhao Y. 2023. MAE-BG: dual-stream boundary optimization for remote sensing image semantic segmentation, Geocarto Int, 38, 1, (April 2023), 2190622. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2023.2190622Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T. 2015. Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. Ieee T Pattern Anal, 39, 4, (April 2017), 640-651. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. He KM, Zhang X, Ren S, 2016. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 770-778. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jha D, Smedsrud P H, Riegler M A, 2019. ResUNet++: An Advanced Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM), San Diego, CA, USA, 225-2255. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM46123.2019.00049.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fid A, Fw B, Pc A, 2020. ResUNet-a: A deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed data. ISPRS J Photogramm, 162, (April 2020), 94-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.01.013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Li R, Zheng SY, Zhang C, 2021. A2-FPN for Semantic Segmentation of Fine-Resolution Remotely Sensed Images. arXiv:2102.07997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. 2018. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 7132-7141. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Boundary Detector Network with Squeeze-and-Excitation Network for Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SPCNC '23: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing, Computer Networks and Communications
      December 2023
      435 pages
      ISBN:9798400716430
      DOI:10.1145/3654446

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format