skip to main content
10.1145/3661167.3661185acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Harnessing No-Code Blockchain for DeFi: A Microcredit Case Study on AstraKode Blockchain

Published: 18 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Spurred by Decentralized Finance's growth, the application of blockchain beyond cryptocurrency has seen a steady rise in recent years as smart contract-based solutions have become increasingly valuable in several other industries. Nonetheless, the technical complexities still pose significant barriers, especially for those lacking previous blockchain expertise. No-code platforms such as AstraKode Blockchain (AKB) offer to mitigate or even abate such barriers by providing a simplified, configurable environment that facilitates development and deployment. AKB's effective application in a microcredit project, the object of this paper, underscores the potential positioning of no-code platforms as key enablers for industries facing cost and complexity challenges in their blockchain adoption journey.

References

[1]
Sunny, F. A. (2022). A systematic review of blockchain applications. IEEE Access, 10.
[2]
Kant, N. (2021). Blockchain: a strategic resource to attain and sustain competitive advantage. International Journal of Innovation Science, 520-538.
[3]
Vovchenko, N. G. (2017). Competitive advantages of financial transactions on the basis of the blockchain technology in digital economy. European Research Studies, 20(3B), 193.
[4]
Niranjanamurthy, M., (2019). Analysis of Blockchain technology: pros, cons and SWOT. Cluster Computing, 22.
[5]
AlShamsi, M., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K. (2022). A systematic review on blockchain adoption. Applied Sciences, 12(9), 4245.
[6]
Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World. Penguin Random House.
[7]
Zetzsche, D. A. (2020). Decentralized finance (defi). Journal of Financial Regulation, 6, 172-203.
[8]
Rejeb, A. (2022). Barriers to blockchain adoption in the circular economy: a fuzzy Delphi and best-worst approach. Sustainability, 14(6), 3611.
[9]
Yan, Z. (2021). The Impacts of Low/No-Code Development on Digital Transformation and Software Development. Computers and Society.
[10]
Curty, S. (2023). Design of Blockchain-Based Applications Using Model-Driven Engineering and Low-Code/No-Code Platforms: A Structured Literature Review. Special Section Paper, 22, 1857–1895.
[11]
Cachin, C., Vukolić, M. (2017). Blockchain consensus protocols in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01873.
[12]
Gorenflo, C. (2020). FastFabric: Scaling hyperledger fabric to 20 000 transactions per second. International Journal of Network Management, 30(5).
[13]
Hugo Hoffmann, C. (2021). Blockchain use cases revisited: Micro-lending solutions for retail banking and financial inclusion. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 9(1), 1-15.
[14]
Asaduzzaman, M., Hasib, F., Hafiz, Z. B. (2020). Towards using blockchain technology for microcredit industry in Bangladesh. In 2020 23rd International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[15]
Mirković, A. (2019). A model-driven approach to establishment of private blockchain business networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Society and Technology. ISOS Conference Proceedings Series, pp. 10–14.
[16]
Foschini, L. (2020). Hyperledger fabric blockchain: Chaincode performance analysis. In ICC 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EASE '24: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
June 2024
728 pages
ISBN:9798400717017
DOI:10.1145/3661167
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 June 2024

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

EASE 2024

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 232 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 32
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media