A Comprehensive Framework Proposal to Design Symbiotic AI Systems
Pages 460 - 465
Abstract
Nowadays, the rapid spread of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the daily lives of individuals is raising multiple challenges and issues. The latter must be timely and effectively addressed since they have a substantial impact on numerous domains with implications concerning the technicalities, typically faced by computer science, and also to multiple areas of society, such as law, ethics, psychology, etc. The PhD project presented in this manuscript aims at finding new human-centered methodologies and techniques, belonging to the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) discipline, that can be applied to the design and development of AI to foster the symbiotic relationship between machines and humans. The project deals with Symbiotic Artificial Intelligence (SAI), which has the goal of supporting humans in executing their tasks without replacing them. The research aims at finding the intersection between Software Engineering (SE), HCI, and AI to create a framework supporting and providing guidance to all the parties involved in the process of creating effective SAI systems.
References
[1]
Jeanne Altmann. 1974. Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49, 3-4 (1974), 227 – 266. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853974X00534 Place: Leiden, The Netherlands Publisher: Brill.
[2]
Kamanashis Biswas and Ashraful Alam Farazi. 2011. Impacts of Usability Design in Software Development Process: A Case Study on Bangladesh. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Koln, DEU.
[3]
Alex Borges, Waldemar Ferreira, Emanoel Barreiros, Adauto Almeida, Liliane Fonseca, Eudis Teixeira, Diogo Silva, Aline Alencar, and Sergio Soares. 2015. Support mechanisms to conduct empirical studies in software engineering: a systematic mapping study. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. ACM, Nanjing China, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745802.2745823
[4]
Pierre Bourque and R. E. Fairley (Eds.). 2014. SWEBOK: guide to the software engineering body of knowledge (version 3.0 ed.). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA. OCLC: 880350861.
[5]
The European Commission. 2024. Proposal for a Regulation Of The European Parliament And Of The Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules On Asrtificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) And Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c102:H.CON.RES.1.IH
[6]
Reidar Conradi, Alf Inge Wang, and ESERNET (Eds.). 2003. Empirical methods and studies in software engineering: experiences from ESERNET (1 ed.). Number 2765 in Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin; New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/b11962
[7]
Antonio Curci and Andrea Esposito. 2024. Detecting Brain Tumors Through Multimodal Neural Networks. In 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods. SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda., Rome, Italy, 995–1000. https://doi.org/10.5220/0012608600003654
[8]
Jessica Fjeld, Nele Achten, Hannah Hilligoss, Adam Nagy, and Madhulika Srikumar. 2020. Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3518482
[9]
International Organization for Standardization. [n. d.]. ISO 9241:210 - Ergonomics of human-system interaction. https://www.iso.org/standard/77520.html
[10]
International Organization for Standardization. 2019. ISO 9241:210 - Ergonomics of human-system interaction: Human-centred design for interactive systems. https://www.iso.org/standard/77520.html
[11]
Gazzetta Ufficiale dell’Unione Europea. 2018. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
[12]
Lucas Gren. 2018. Standards of validity and the validity of standards in behavioral software engineering research: the perspective of psychological test theory. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. ACM, Oulu Finland, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239235.3267437
[13]
Riccardo Guidotti, Anna Monreale, Salvatore Ruggieri, Franco Turini, Fosca Giannotti, and Dino Pedreschi. 2019. A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models. Comput. Surveys 51, 5 (Sept. 2019), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236009
[14]
Sarah Mandl, Maria Kobert, Maximilian Bretschneider, Frank Asbrock, Bertolt Meyer, Anja Strobel, and Thomas Süße. 2023. Exploring key categories of social perception and moral responsibility of AI-based agents at work: Findings from a case study in an industrial setting. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Hamburg, Germany, ) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 115, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585906
[15]
Silverio Martínez-Fernández, Justus Bogner, Xavier Franch, Marc Oriol, Julien Siebert, Adam Trendowicz, Anna Maria Vollmer, and Stefan Wagner. 2022. Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Survey. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 31, 2 (April 2022), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487043
[16]
Bastian Pfleging, Stefan Schneegass, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Exploring user expectations for context and road video sharing while calling and driving. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, Eindhoven Netherlands, 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516547
[17]
Roberto Polillo. 2010. Apogeo Education.
[18]
Conrad Sanderson, David Douglas, Qinghua Lu, Emma Schleiger, Jon Whittle, Justine Lacey, Glenn Newnham, Stefan Hajkowicz, Cathy Robinson, and David Hansen. 2023. AI Ethics Principles in Practice: Perspectives of Designers and Developers. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 4, 2 (June 2023), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1109/tts.2023.3257303
[19]
Helen Sharp, Jennifer Preece, and Yvonne Rogers. 2019. Interaction Design: beyond human-computer interaction (5 ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[20]
Ben Shneiderman. 2022. Human-Centered AI (1 ed.). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.001.0001
[21]
Ben Shneiderman, Catherine Plaisant, Maxine Cohen, Steven Jacobs, Niklas Elmqvist, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2016. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson Education. https://books.google.it/books?id=PpItDAAAQBAJ
[22]
Maryna Vahabava. 2023. The risks associated with generative AI apps in the European Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA). In Workshops at the Second International Conference on Hybrid Human-Artificial Intelligence (HHAI). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Munich, Germany.
[23]
Niklaus Wirth. 2008. A Brief History of Software Engineering. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 30, 3 (July 2008), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2008.33
[24]
Claes Wohlin, Martin Höst, and Kennet Henningsson. 2003. Empirical Research Methods in Software Engineering. In Empirical Methods and Studies in Software Engineering, Gerhard Goos, Juris Hartmanis, Jan Van Leeuwen, Reidar Conradi, and Alf Inge Wang (Eds.). Vol. 2765. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45143-3_2 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[25]
Minshun Yang, Seiji Sato, Hironori Washizaki, Yoshiaki Fukazawa, and Juichi Takahashi. 2023. Identifying Characteristics of the Agile Development Process That Impact User Satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. ACM, Oulu Finland, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593434.3593470
Index Terms
- A Comprehensive Framework Proposal to Design Symbiotic AI Systems
Recommendations
POLARIS: A Framework to Guide the Development of Trustworthy AI Systems
CAIN '24: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 3rd International Conference on AI Engineering - Software Engineering for AIIn the ever-expanding landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI), where innovation thrives and new products and services are continuously being delivered, ensuring that AI systems are designed and developed responsibly throughout their entire lifecycle is ...
Modern software cybernetics
Classify software cybernetics as Software Cybernetics I and II.Identify the transition from Software Cybernetics I to Software Cybernetics II.Indicate that some new research areas are related to Software Cybernetics II.Highlight new research trends of ...
Trust in an AI versus a Human teammate: The effects of teammate identity and performance on Human-AI cooperation
AbstractRecent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) enable researchers to create more powerful AI agents that are becoming competent teammates for humans. However, human distrust of AI is a critical factor that may impede human-AI ...
Highlights- Humans accept their AI teammate's decision less often when they are deceived about the identity of the AI as another human.
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
728 pages
ISBN:9798400717017
DOI:10.1145/3661167
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 18 June 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
EASE 2024
EASE 2024: 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
June 18 - 21, 2024
Salerno, Italy
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 232 submissions, 31%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 71Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)71
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format