VR-Mediated Cognitive Defusion: A Comparative Study for Managing Negative Thoughts
Pages 117 - 126
Abstract
The growing prevalence of psychological disorders underscores the critical importance of mental health research in today's society. In psychotherapy, particularly Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), cognitive exercises employing mental imagery are used to manage negative thoughts. However, the challenge of maintaining vivid imagery diminishes their therapeutic effectiveness. Virtual reality (VR) offers untapped potential for increasing engagement and therapeutic efficacy. However, there is still a gap in exploration regarding how to effectively leverage the potential of VR to enhance traditional cognitive exercises with mental imagery. This study investigates the effective HCI design and the comparative efficacy of a VR-mediated exercise for promoting cognitive defusion to address negative thoughts grounded in ACT. Using a co-design approach with clinicians and potential users of postgraduate students, we developed a VR system that materializes negative thoughts into tangible objects. This allows users to visually modify and transpose these objects onto a surface, facilitating mental detachment from negative thoughts. In an evaluation study with 20 non-clinical participants, divided into VR and mental imagery groups, we assessed the impact of the cognitive defusion exercise on their perception of negative thoughts and psychological measures using standardized questionnaires. Results show improvement in both groups, with significant enhancements in negative thought perception and mental detachment from negative thoughts exclusively in the VR group, whereas the mental imagery group did not demonstrate significant changes. Interviews emphasize the VR's capability to present vivid visualizations of negative thoughts effortlessly, highlighting its effectiveness and engagement in psychotherapy to facilitate cognitive exercises.
References
[1]
Aaron T Beck, Robert A Steer, and Gregory Brown. 1996. Beck depression inventory--II. Psychological assessment (1996).
[2]
Helen Bolderston, David T Gillanders, Georgia Turner, Holly C Taylor, Alister Coleman, et al. 2019. The initial validation of a state version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 12 (2019), 207-- 215.
[3]
Ausiàs Cebolla, Rocío Herrero, Sara Ventura, Marta Miragall, Miguel Bellosta- Batalla, Roberto Llorens, and Rosa Ma Baños. 2019. Putting oneself in the body of others: a pilot study on the efficacy of an embodied virtual reality system to generate self-compassion. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019), 1521.
[4]
Zülal Çelik, Furkan Bahadır Alptekin, and Kasım Fatih Yavuz. 2020. Acrophobia treatment with virtual reality-assisted acceptance and commitment therapy: Two case reports. Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences (2020).
[5]
Hongdu Deng, Ruiling Zhang, Chuansheng Wang, Bingyu Zhang, Jiali Wang, ShilinWang, Jie Zhang, Nurul Izzah Shari, and Mohammad Farris Iman Leong Bin Abdullah. 2023. The efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of alcohol use disorder among adult males: a randomized controlled trial comparing with acceptance and commitment therapy and treatment as usual. Frontiers in psychiatry 14 (2023).
[6]
Hayley Dewe, Janna M Gottwald, Laura-Ashleigh Bird, Harry Brenton, Marco Gillies, and Dorothy Cowie. 2021. My virtual self: the role of movement in children's sense of embodiment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 12 (2021), 4061--4072.
[7]
Nina Döllinger, Carolin Wienrich, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2021. Challenges and opportunities of immersive technologies for mindfulness meditation: a systematic review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021), 644683.
[8]
Christiane Eichenberg and Carolin Wolters. 2012. Virtual realities in the treatment of mental disorders: A review of the current state of research. Virtual reality in psychological, medical and pedagogical applications 2 (2012), 35--64.
[9]
Teresa M Evans, Lindsay Bira, Jazmin Beltran Gastelum, L Todd Weiss, and Nathan L Vanderford. 2018. Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature biotechnology 36, 3 (2018), 282--284.
[10]
D. Freeman, S. Reeve, A. Robinson, A. Ehlers, D. Clark, B. Spanlang, and M. Slater. 2017. Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychological Medicine 47, 14 (2017), 2393--2400. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171700040X
[11]
Paul Frewen, Divya Mistry, Jenney Zhu, Talia Kielt, Christine Wekerle, Ruth A Lanius, and Rakesh Jetly. 2020. Proof of concept of an eclectic, integrative therapeutic approach to mental health and well-being through virtual reality technology. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020), 858.
[12]
Charlotte Gentili, Vendela Zetterqvist, Jenny Rickardsson, Linda Holmström, Laura E Simons, and Rikard K Wicksell. 2020. ACTsmart--development and feasibility of digital acceptance and commitment therapy for adults with chronic pain. NPJ digital medicine 3, 1 (2020), 20.
[13]
Simone Gorinelli, Ana Gallego, Päivi Lappalainen, and Raimo Lappalainen. 2023. Virtual reality acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for social and public speaking anxiety: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 28 (2023), 289--299.
[14]
Russell Harris. 2006. Embracing your demons: An overview of acceptance and commitment therapy. Psychotherapy in Australia 12, 4 (2006).
[15]
Russ Harris. 2019. ACT made simple: An easy-to-read primer on acceptance and commitment therapy. New Harbinger Publications.
[16]
Hilary-Anne Healy, Yvonne Barnes-Holmes, Dermot Barnes-Holmes, Claire Keogh, Carmen Luciano, and Kelly Wilson. 2008. An experimental test of a cognitive defusion exercise: Coping with negative and positive self-statements. The Psychological Record 58 (2008), 623--640.
[17]
Nicola R Hemmings, Jamie M Kawadler, Rachel Whatmough, Sonia Ponzo, Alessio Rossi, Davide Morelli, Geoffrey Bird, and David Plans. 2021. Development and Feasibility of a Digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy--Based Intervention for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Pilot Acceptability Study. JMIR Formative Research 5, 2 (2021), e21737.
[18]
Christophe Jallais and Anne-Laure Gilet. 2010. Inducing changes in arousal and valence: Comparison of two mood induction procedures. Behavior research methods 42, 1 (2010), 318--325.
[19]
Maria Karekla, Angelos P Kassianos, and Danae Papageorgiou. 2022. Digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Digital Delivery of Mental Health Therapies: A guide to the benefits and challenges, and making it work 119 (2022).
[20]
Alexandra Kitson, Alissa N Antle, and Petr Slovak. 2023. Co-Designing a Virtual Reality Intervention for Supporting Cognitive Reappraisal Skills Development with Youth. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conf. 14--26.
[21]
Alexandra Kitson, Mirjana Prpa, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2018. Immersive interactive technologies for positive change: a scoping review and design considerations. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 1354.
[22]
Veronika Krauß, Michael Nebeling, Florian Jasche, and Alexander Boden. 2022. Elements of xr prototyping: Characterizing the role and use of prototypes in augmented and virtual reality design. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--18.
[23]
Päivi Lappalainen, Sitwat Langrial, Harri Oinas-Kukkonen, Asko Tolvanen, and Raimo Lappalainen. 2015. Web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for depressive symptoms with minimal support: a randomized controlled trial. Behavior modification 39, 6 (2015), 805--834.
[24]
Andreas Larsson, Nic Hooper, Lisa A Osborne, Paul Bennett, and Louise McHugh. 2016. Using brief cognitive restructuring and cognitive defusion techniques to cope with negative thoughts. Behavior modification 40, 3 (2016), 452--482.
[25]
Philip Lindner, William Hamilton, Alexander Miloff, and Per Carlbring. 2019. How to treat depression with low-intensity virtual reality interventions: perspectives on translating cognitive behavioral techniques into the virtual reality modality and how to make anti-depressive use of virtual reality--unique experiences. Frontiers in psychiatry 10 (2019), 792.
[26]
Caitlin Mills and Sidney D'Mello. 2014. On the validity of the autobiographical emotional memory task for emotion induction. PloS one 9, 4 (2014), e95837.
[27]
Orla Moran, Julie Doyle, Oonagh Giggins, Louise McHugh, Evelyn Gould, Suzanne Smith, Shane Gavin, Nisanth Sojan, Gordon Boyle, et al. 2022. Efficacy of a Digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention for the Improvement of Self-management Behaviors and Psychological Flexibility in Adults With Cardiac Disease: Protocol for a Single Case Experimental Design. JMIR Research Protocols 11, 4 (2022), e33783.
[28]
Coimbatore K Prahalad and Venkat Ramaswamy. 2004. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing 18, 3 (2004), 5--14.
[29]
Arianna Prudenzi, Brendan Rooney, Giovambattista Presti, Marco Lombardo, Daniele Lombardo, Concetta Messina, and Louise McHugh. 2019. Testing the effectiveness of virtual reality as a defusion technique for coping with unwanted thoughts. Virtual Reality 23, 2 (2019), 179--185.
[30]
Albert Rizzo and Sebastian Koenig. 2017. Is Clinical Virtual Reality Ready for Primetime? Neuropsychology 31 (11 2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000405
[31]
Elizabeth B-N Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4, 1 (2008), 5--18.
[32]
Elizabeth B-N Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2014. Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign 10, 1 (2014), 5--14.
[33]
Thomas Schubert, Frank Friedmann, and Holger Regenbrecht. 2001. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 10, 3 (2001), 266--281.
[34]
Mel Slater, Daniel Pérez Marcos, Henrik Ehrsson, and Maria V Sanchez-Vives. 2009. Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Frontiers in neuroscience (2009), 29.
[35]
Mel Slater and Sylvia Wilbur. 1997. A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 6, 6 (1997), 603--616.
[36]
Changwon Son, Sudeep Hegde, Alec Smith, Xiaomei Wang, and Farzan Sasangohar. 2020. Effects of COVID-19 on college students' mental health in the United States: Interview survey study. Journal of medical internet research 22, 9 (2020), e21279.
[37]
Charles D Spielberger, Fernando Gonzalez-Reigosa, Angel Martinez-Urrutia, Luiz FS Natalicio, and Diana S Natalicio. 1971. The state-trait anxiety inventory. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia/Interamerican journal of psychology 5, 3 & 4 (1971).
[38]
Ian Tyndall, Daniel Waldeck, Luca Pancani, Robert Whelan, Bryan Roche, and David L Dawson. 2019. The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) as a measure of experiential avoidance: Concerns over discriminant validity. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 12 (2019), 278--284.
[39]
Nadine Wagener, Jasmin Niess, Yvonne Rogers, and Johannes Schöning. 2022. wagdener2022moodds: A virtual environment for autonomous emotional expression. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16.
[40]
Nadine Wagener, Leon Reicherts, Nima Zargham, Natalia Bartłomiejczyk, Ava Elizabeth Scott, Katherine Wang, Marit Bentvelzen, Evropi Stefanidi, Thomas Mildner, Yvonne Rogers, et al. 2023. SelVReflect: A Guided VR Experience Fostering Reflection on Personal Challenges. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--17.
[41]
Nadine Wagener, Johannes Schoning, Yvonne Rogers, and Jasmin Niess. 2023. Letting It Go: Four Design Concepts to Support Emotion Regulation in Virtual Reality. In 2023 IEEE Conf. on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). IEEE, 763--764.
[42]
Rainer Westermann, Kordelia Spies, Günter Stahl, and Friedrich W Hesse. 1996. Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: A meta-analysis. European Journal of social psychology 26, 4 (1996), 557--580.
[43]
Erica K Yuen, Elizabeth M Goetter, Michael J Stasio, Philip Ash, Briana Mansour, Erin McNally, Morgan Sanchez, Erica Hobar, Simone Forte, Kristin Zulaica, et al. 2019. A pilot of acceptance and commitment therapy for public speaking anxiety delivered with group videoconferencing and virtual reality exposure. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 12 (2019), 47--54.
[44]
Timothy Zhang, Richard Booth, Royce Jean-Louis, Ryan Chan, Anthony Yeung, David Gratzer, Gillian Strudwick, et al. 2020. A primer on usability assessment approaches for health-related applications of virtual reality. JMIR serious games 8, 4 (2020), e18153.
Index Terms
- VR-Mediated Cognitive Defusion: A Comparative Study for Managing Negative Thoughts
Recommendations
Testing the effectiveness of virtual reality as a defusion technique for coping with unwanted thoughts
Negative thoughts are experienced by as many as 80---99% of the population. These thoughts are associated with a variety of negative consequences, including negative mood, decreased task performance and the development of psychopathology. One technique ...
Effects of virtual environment platforms on emotional responses
The goal of the current study was to investigate the effects of different virtual environment (VE) technologies (i.e., desktop, head mounted display, or fully immersive platforms) on emotional arousal and task performance. Fifty-three participants were ...
A cognitive model for emotional regulation in virtual reality exposure
AbstractVirtual reality exposure (VRE) is an effective form of psychotherapy. However, theoretical frameworks for user experience of virtual reality (VR) have yet to be fully integrated with psychological theory, limiting optimisation of VRE. Presence, a ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2024
11719 pages
ISBN:9798400706868
DOI:10.1145/3664647
- General Chairs:
- Jianfei Cai,
- Mohan Kankanhalli,
- Balakrishnan Prabhakaran,
- Susanne Boll,
- Program Chairs:
- Ramanathan Subramanian,
- Liang Zheng,
- Vivek K. Singh,
- Pablo Cesar,
- Lexing Xie,
- Dong Xu
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 28 October 2024
Check for updates
Badges
Honorable Mention
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
MM '24
Sponsor:
MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
October 28 - November 1, 2024
Melbourne VIC, Australia
Acceptance Rates
MM '24 Paper Acceptance Rate 1,150 of 4,385 submissions, 26%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 2,145 of 8,556 submissions, 25%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 133Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)133
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)78
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in