skip to main content
10.1145/3666094.3666102acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Mapping User Participation in the Design of Digital Public Services: Is Participatory Design Relevant?

Published: 29 August 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Participatory design has struggled in the context of large public systems development. Two decades ago, ‘reformist PD agenda', inviting PD practitioners to consider participation in public sector development, assess paradigm claims and revitalise the political perspective of PD. Today's digitalisation wave, with public digital services becoming the only option for citizen interaction with authorities, reveals digital inequalities in society that once again puts focus on civic agency in public sector design. This paper investigates user participation in digital public service design through an empirical study, composed by twelve semi-structured interviews with key actors in digitalizing public services in Denmark, followed by a thematic analysis. The study highlights how the national digital strategy, procurement processes, available competence and other factors shape user participation in public sector design. Based on these findings, we reflect on the potential role of PD in contemporary public sector design.

References

[1]
25 års fælles digitaliseringsstrategier: https://digst.dk/strategier/den-faellesoffentlige-digitaliseringsstrategi/25-aars-faelles-digitaliseringsstrategier/. Accessed: 2024-02-15.
[2]
Andersen, K. 2023. Fast Track to Vision 2030.
[3]
Balka, E. 2006. Inside the Belly of the Beast: The Challenges and Successes of a Reformist Participatory Agenda. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design - Volume 1 (New York, NY, USA, 2006), 134–143.
[4]
Bannon, L. 2018. Reimagining participatory design. Interactions. 26, 1 (Dec. 2018), 26–32.
[5]
Beck, E. 2002. P for Political: Participation is Not Enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems. 14, 1 (Jan. 2002).
[6]
Björgvinsson, E. 2010. Participatory Design and “Democratizing Innovation.” Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 41–50.
[7]
Bødker, S. 2017. Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 26, 1 (Apr. 2017), 245–273.
[8]
Brown, T. 2008. Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review.
[9]
Carl diSalvo Design as Democratic Inquiry- Putting Experimental Civics into Practice.
[10]
Castell, P. 2016. Institutional framing of citizen initiatives: a challenge for advancing public participation in Sweden. International Planning Studies. 21, 4 (Oct. 2016), 305–316.
[11]
Christensen, C. 2022. Volunteer-based IT Helpdesks as Ambiguous Quasi-Public Services - a Case Study from Two Nordic Countries. Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference (New York, NY, USA, Oktober 2022), 1–12.
[12]
digital-inklusion-i-det-digitaliserede-samfund.pdf: 2021. https://digst.dk/media/24389/digital-inklusion-i-det-digitaliserede-samfund.pdf. Accessed: 2023-09-11.
[13]
Digitaliseringsstyrelsen 2022. National Strategy for Digitalisation - together in the digital development.
[14]
Dittrich, Y. Making e-government happen everyday co-development of services, citizenship and technology. 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.
[15]
Dittrich, Y. 2002. PD in the Wild; Evolving Practices of Design in Use. PDC. (Jan. 2002), 124–134.
[16]
Ekelin, A. 2002. Consulting the citizens. Relationship-based interaction in e-goverment | PDC. (2002).
[17]
Fischer, G. and Giaccardi, E. 2006. Meta-design: A Framework for the Future of End-User Development. End User Development. H. Lieberman, eds. Springer Netherlands. 427–457.
[18]
Foth, M. 2015. From Users to Citizens: Some Thoughts on Designing for Polity and Civics. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Dec. 2015), 623–633.
[19]
Foth, M. and Turner, T.J. 2019. The Premise of Institutioning for the Proliferation of Communities and Technologies Research. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities (Vienna Austria, Jun. 2019), 24–28.
[20]
Grönvall, E. and Lundberg, S. 2022. Designing for offline and online social work: Technology-mediated collaborative practices in and between municipalities. Proceedings of the 33rd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (New York, NY, USA, Oktober 2022), 1–7.
[21]
Grönvall, E. and Lundberg, S. 2023. Exploring participatory pre-project processes: Making research work in municipality organizations. Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2023), 160–171.
[22]
Helsper, E.J. and Reisdorf, B.C. 2017. The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society. 19, 8 (Aug. 2017), 1253–1270.
[23]
Henderson, A. and Kyng, M. 1995. There's No Place Like Home: Continuing Design in Use. Readings in Human–Computer Interaction. R.M. Baecker, eds. Morgan Kaufmann. 793–803.
[24]
Huybrechts, L. 2016. De Andere Markt: transferring imaginations of work. Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2 (New York, NY, USA, Aug. 2016), 74–75.
[25]
Huybrechts, L. 2017. Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the public realm. CoDesign. 13, 3 (Jul. 2017), 148–159.
[26]
Kohtala, C. 2020. A taxonomy of users’ active design engagement in the 21st century. Design Studies. 67, (Mar. 2020), 27–54.
[27]
Lodato, T. and DiSalvo, C. 2018. Institutional constraints: the forms and limits of participatory design in the public realm. Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (Hasselt and Genk Belgium, Aug. 2018), 1–12.
[28]
Manoharan, A.P. 2023. Digital Governance: An Assessment of Performance and Best Practices. Public Organization Review. 23, 1 (Mar. 2023), 265–283.
[29]
Manzini, E. and Staszowski, E. 2013. Public and Collaborative:: Exploring the Intersection of Design, Social Innovation and Public Policy. DESIS Network.
[30]
Medaglia, R. 2007. The challenged identity of a field: The state of the art of eParticipation research. Information Polity. 12, 3 (Jan. 2007), 169–181.
[31]
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE.
[32]
Network for Digital Inclusion: https://en.digst.dk/digital-services/digital-inclusion/network-for-digital-inclusion/. Accessed: 2023-10-07.
[33]
Papazu, I. 2022. Outsourcing response-ability: Welfare After Digitalization. (2022).
[34]
Park, S. and Humphry, J. 2019. Exclusion by design: intersections of social, digital and data exclusion. Information, Communication & Society. 22, 7 (Jun. 2019), 934–953.
[35]
Petersen, K. and Hansen, J.S. 2020. Digitalization and the Danish Welfare State: Policies, Institutional Changes and Strategic Dilemmas. Journal of Policy Science. 27, 3 (2020), 97–113.
[36]
Pilemalm, S. 2018. Participatory Design in Emerging Civic Engagement Initiatives in the New Public Sector: Applying PD Concepts in Resource-Scarce Organizations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 25, 1 (Feb. 2018), 1–26.
[37]
Pirinen, A. 2022. Design Enters the City: Requisites and Points of Friction in Deepening Public Sector Design. (2022).
[38]
Saad-Sulonen, J. 2014. COMBINING PARTICIPATIONS. Expanding the Locus of Participatory E‐Planning by Combining Participatory Approaches in the Design of Digital Technology and in Urban Planning. Aalto University.
[39]
Saad-Sulonen, J. 2020. Service design and participatory design: time to join forces? Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2 (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2020), 76–81.
[40]
Saad-Sulonen, J.C. and Horelli, L. 2010. The value of Community Informatics to participatory urban planning and design: a case-study in Helsinki. The Journal of Community Informatics. 6, 2 (Sep. 2010).
[41]
Schou, J. and Hjelholt, M. 2019. Digital state spaces: state rescaling and advanced digitalization. Territory, Politics, Governance. 7, 4 (Oct. 2019), 438–454.
[42]
Schou, J. and Pors, A.S. 2019. Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare. Social Policy & Administration. 53, 3 (2019), 464–477.
[43]
Selloni, D. 2017. CoDesign for Public-Interest Services. Springer.
[44]
Seravalli, A. 2012. Infrastructuring for opening production, from participatory design to participatory making? Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference on Exploratory Papers Workshop Descriptions Industry Cases - Volume 2 - PDC ’12 (Roskilde, Denmark, 2012), 53.
[45]
Shapiro, D. 2005. Participatory design: the will to succeed. Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (Aarhus Denmark, Aug. 2005), 29–38.
[46]
Stickdorn, M. 2018. This Is Service Design Doing. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
[47]
Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J.M. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
[48]
Swan, K. 2018. Leading with Legitimacy in Government Design Labs. (2018).
[49]
Teli, M. 2022. Intermediation in design as a practice of institutioning and commoning. Design Studies. 82, (Sep. 2022), 101132.
[50]
Teli, M. 2020. Tales of Institutioning and Commoning: Participatory Design Processes with a Strategic and Tactical Perspective. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1 (Manizales Colombia, Jun. 2020), 159–171.
[51]
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. 2008. Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 36, 1 (Mar. 2008), 1–10.
[52]
Ylipulli, J. and Luusua, A. 2019. Without libraries what have we? Public libraries as nodes for technological empowerment in the era of smart cities, AI and big data. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2019), 92–101.

Index Terms

  1. Mapping User Participation in the Design of Digital Public Services: Is Participatory Design Relevant?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PDC '24: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 1
    August 2024
    262 pages
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 August 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Design
    2. Digitalisation
    3. Mapping
    4. Participation
    5. Participatory Design
    6. Public services

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    PDC '24
    PDC '24: Participatory Design Conference 2024
    August 11 - 16, 2024
    Sibu, Malaysia

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 49 of 289 submissions, 17%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 287
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)287
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)67
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media