skip to main content
10.1145/3670653.3670656acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

What Makes for a Good UX Professional?: Development of a UX Professional Competence Model

Published: 01 September 2024 Publication History

Abstract

More than ever, companies need to find the right user experience (UX) employees who are competent in UX and have the necessary soft skills. Although training plans are available, the competencies required in practice are mainly unclear. An overview of the competencies relevant to UX professionals would help with the composition of digital product teams. Therefore, 25 exploratory interviews were conducted with UX managers to learn what they considered to be the relevant competence characteristics of UX professionals. The thematic analysis of the interviews reveals motives (e.g., interest in what they do), traits (e.g., honesty), knowledge (e.g., knowing UX theories and methods), and many skills (e.g., communicating with and mediating among others), but also the expected self-image (e.g., eager for knowledge) of competent UX professionals. Based on these insights, we develop a competence model that enables managers to identify suitable candidates for a job and develop the competencies of UX professionals.

References

[1]
Allabarton, R. 2021. The Differing Roles of the UX Designer | UX Magazine. https://uxmag.com/articles/the-differing-roles-of-the-ux-designer. Accessed 1 November 2021.
[2]
Battarbee, K. and Koskinen, I. 2005. Co-experience. User experience as interaction. CoDesign 1, 1, 5–18.
[3]
Beyer, H. 2010. User-centered agile methods. Morgan & Claypool, San Francisco, Calif.
[4]
Blythe, M. 2014. Research through design fiction. In CHI 2014 - Conference proceedings. Assoc. for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 703–712. DOI=10.1145/2556288.2557098.
[5]
Blythe, M. and Wright, P. 2006. Pastiche scenarios. Fiction as a resource for user centred design. Interacting with Computers 18, 5, 1139–1164.
[6]
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2, 77–101.
[7]
Brhel, M., Meth, H., Mädche, A., and Werder, K. 2015. Exploring principles of user-centered agile software development: A literature review. Information and Software Technology 61, 163–181.
[8]
Brown, D. D. 2013. Five Agile UX Myths. J. Usability Studies 8, 3, 55–60.
[9]
Bruun, A., Larusdottir, M. K., Nielsen, L., Nielsen, P. A., and Persson, J. S. 2018. The role of UX professionals in agile development. In Revisting the Life Cycle. Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer InteractionOslo, Norway, 1-3 October, 2018 : Nordichi 2018 Oslo. ACM Digital Library. ACM, New York, 352–363. DOI=10.1145/3240167.3240213.
[10]
Carnegie Mellon University. 2020. About the MHCI Program. https://www.hcii.cmu.edu/academics/mhci. Accessed 11 December 2020.
[11]
Cheetham, G. and Chivers, G. 1998. The reflective (and competent) practitioner: a model of professional competence which seeks to harmonise the reflective practitioner and competence‐based approaches. Jnl Euro Industrial Training 22, 7, 267–276.
[12]
Connell, M. W., Sheridan, K., and Gardner, H. 2003. On Abilities and Domains. In The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise, E. L. Grigorenko and R. J. Sternberg, Eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 126–155. DOI=10.1017/CBO9780511615801.007.
[13]
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. 2006. A behavioral theory of the firm. Blackwell, Malden, Mass.
[14]
da Silva, T. S., Silveira, M. S., O. Melo, C. de, and Parzianello, L. C. 2013. Understanding the UX Designer's Role within Agile Teams. In Design, user experience, and usability. Second international conference, DUXU 2013, held as part of HCI International 2013, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 21-26, 2013; proceedings, A. Marcus, Ed. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8012. Springer, Berlin, 599–609. DOI=10.1007/978-3-642-39229-0_64.
[15]
Desmet, P. M. A. and Pohlmeyer, A. E. 2013. Positive design. An introduction to design for subjective well-being. International Journal of Design, 7 (3), 2013, 5–19.
[16]
Forlizzi, J. and Ford, S. 2000. The building blocks of experience. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. DIS ’00. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 419–423. DOI=10.1145/347642.347800.
[17]
Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., and Grimshaw, J. M. 2010. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology & health 25, 10, 1229–1245.
[18]
Gaver, B., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. 1999. Design. Cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1, 21–29.
[19]
Gläser, J. and Laudel, G. 2010. Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden.
[20]
Google. 2021. Google Trends for UX Designer 2004-2021. https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=ux%20designer.
[21]
Hassenzahl, M. 2001. The Effect of Perceived Hedonic Quality on Product Appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13, 4, 481–499.
[22]
Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., and Koller, F. 2003. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In Mensch & Computer 2003. Interaktion in Bewegung, J. Ziegler and G. Szwillus, Eds. Berichte des German Chapter of the ACM 57. Teubner, Stuttgart, 187–196.
[23]
Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., and Lehner, K. 2000. Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 201–208. DOI=10.1145/332040.332432.
[24]
Hayes, J., Rose‐Quirie, A., and Allinson, C. W. 2000. Senior managers’ perceptions of the competencies they require for effective performance: implications for training and development. Personnel Review 29, 1, 92–105.
[25]
Helfat, C. E. and Peteraf, M. A. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view. Capability lifecycles. Strat. Mgmt. J. 24, 10, 997–1010.
[26]
International Usability and User Experience Qualification Board. 2018. CPUX-F Curriculum and Glossary. International Usability and User Experience Qualification Board.
[27]
International Usability and User Experience Qualification Board. 2024. https://uxqb.org/en/.
[28]
ISO 9241-210. 2019. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems, ISO 9241-210:2019. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/.
[29]
Jordan, P. W. 1998. Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics 29, 1, 25–33.
[30]
Klieme, E., Hartig, J., and Rauch, D. 2008. The concept of competence in educational contexts. In Assessment of competencies in educational contexts, J. Hartig, E. Klieme and D. Leutner, Eds. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Ashland, OH, US, 3–22.
[31]
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., and Salas, E. 1993. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 2, 311–328.
[32]
Krumm, S., Mertin, I., and Dries, C. 2012. Kompetenzmodelle. Praxis der Personalpsychologie 27. Hogrefe, Göttingen.
[33]
Kuusinen, K. and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. 2012. How to make agile UX work more efficient. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Making Sense Through Design. ACM Other conferences. ACM, New York, NY, 139. DOI=10.1145/2399016.2399037.
[34]
Laugwitz, B., Held, T., and Schrepp, M. 2008. Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5298, 63–76.
[35]
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Learning in doing. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[36]
Mambrey, P., Mark, G., and Pankoke-Babatz, U. 1998. User Advocacy in Participatory Design: Designers' Experiences with a New Communication Channel. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 7, 3-4, 291–313.
[37]
Mansfield, R. S. 1996. Building competency models: Approaches for HR professionals. Hum. Resour. Manage. 35, 1, 7–18.
[38]
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. 1976. Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Universitetsforlaget, Bergen.
[39]
McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. 2004. Technology as experience. Interactions 11, 5, 42.
[40]
McClelland, D. C. 1973. Testing for Competence Rather Than for "Intelligence". American Psychologist 28, 1, 1–14.
[41]
McInerney, P. and Maurer, F. 2005. UCD in Agile Projects: Dream Team or Odd Couple? Interactions 12, 6, 19–23.
[42]
Nicolini, A. T., Santos, C. S., Hoeschl, H. C., Theiss, I., and Bueno, T. C. D. 2006. Using Competence Modeling to create Knowledge Engineering Team. In Professional Practice in Artificial Intelligence, J. Debenham, Ed. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. Springer US, 151–159. DOI=10.1007/978-0-387-34749-3_16.
[43]
Ratcliffe, L. and McNeill, M. 2012. Agile experience design. A digital designer's guide to agile, lean, and continuous. New Riders, Berkeley, Calif.
[44]
Robinson, O. C. 2014. Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology 11, 1, 25–41.
[45]
Rogers, C. R. 1945. The Nondirective Method as a Technique for Social Research. American Journal of Sociology 50, 4, 279–283.
[46]
Roth, H. 1971. Pädagogische Anthropologie. Entwicklung und Erziehung. Grundlagen einer Entwicklungspädagogik 2. Herman Schroedel Verlag KG, Berlin, Darmstadt, Dortmund.
[47]
Rozanski, E. P. and Haake, A. R. 2003. The many facets of HCI. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Information technology curriculum. ACM, New York, NY, 180. DOI=10.1145/947121.947162.
[48]
Salas Velasco, M. 2014. Do higher education institutions make a difference in competence development? A model of competence production at university. High Educ 68, 4, 503–523.
[49]
Schön, D. A. 1983. The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Basic Books, Inc; Ebooks Corporation, New York, NY, Claremont.
[50]
Schultze, U. and Avital, M. 2011. Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Information and Organization 21, 1, 1–16.
[51]
Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Batjtsta, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., Kehoe, J., Pearlman, K., Prien, E. P., and Sanchez, J. I. 2000. The Practice Of Competency Modeling. Personnel Psychology 53, 3, 703–740.
[52]
Spencer, L. M. and Spencer, S. M. 1993. Competence at work. Models for superior performance. Wiley, New York.
[53]
Stevens, M. J. and Campion, M. A. 1994. The Knowledge, Skill, and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management. Journal of Management 20, 2, 503–530.
[54]
Thompson, J. E., Stuart, R., and Lindsay, P. R. 1996. The competence of top team members. Journal of Managerial Psych 11, 3, 48–66.
[55]
Thomson, S. B. 2010. Sample Size and Grounded Theory. Journal of Administration and Governance 5, 1, 45–52.
[56]
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science (New York, N.Y.) 185, 4157, 1124–1131.
[57]
Unger, R. and Chandler, C. 2009. A project guide to UX design. For user experience designers in the field or in the making. Voices that matter. New Riders, Berkeley, Calif.
[58]
User Experience Professionals Association International. 2024. About UXPA International. https://uxpa.org/about-uxpa-international/.
[59]
Vancouver, J. B. and Day, D. V. 2005. Industrial and Organisation Research on Self-Regulation: From Constructs to Applications. Applied Psychology 54, 2, 155–185.
[60]
Weinert, F. E. 2001. Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In Defining and selecting key competencies, D. S. Rychen and L. H. Salganik, Eds. Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, 45–65.
[61]
Werder, K., Haake, P., and Mädche, A. 2014. Usability Readiness of German Software SMEs –Three Segments and their Characteristics. In Mensch & Computer 2014 - Tagungsband. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin, 185–194

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MuC '24: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2024
September 2024
719 pages
ISBN:9798400709982
DOI:10.1145/3670653
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. UX education
  2. UX professional
  3. competence model

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MuC '24
MuC '24: Mensch und Computer 2024
September 1 - 4, 2024
Karlsruhe, Germany

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 202
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)202
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)40
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media