"Oh my Dave, your face says it all!": Exploring the Multimodal Practices of Tasting in Live Streaming
Author: 
Le SongAuthors Info & Claims
Le SongAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 271, Pages 1 - 27
Abstract
Research on the activity of tasting, examined through the lens of conversation analysis, reveals that in face-to-face contexts, tasting is an interactive and sequential process that combines individual sensory experience with a public, witnessable, accountable, and intersubjective dimension. This perspective can be extended to the realm of live-streamed tasting, where streamers demonstrate and communicate the taste of food products to online audiences in real time. By adopting multimodal conversation analysis to scrutinize the unfolding sequence moment by moment, my study aims to demonstrate 1) Three practices to achieve the configuration of "tasting heads," wherein the current taster's face is displayed on-screen. 2) Patterns of gaze withdrawal from the screen and subsequent gaze back to the screen during the tasting process. 3) The performative and animated facial expressions. 4) The structure of responses from both streamers and viewers after the tasting.
References
[1]
Adjacency pairs, preference organization, and assessments. (2013). An Introduction to Interaction. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350284821.ch-006
[2]
Ahmed, S., Ting, D. H., Sharif, T., & Abedin, M. Z. (2023). Implication of 'camera eats first' construct: Unraveling the potentials of digital images in social media on information sharing. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09737-x
[3]
Andersen, T., Byrne, D. V., & Wang, Q. J. (2021). How digital food affects our analog lives: The impact of food photography on Healthy Eating Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.634261
[4]
Anjani, L., Mok, T., Tang, A., Oehlberg, L., & Goh, W. B. (2020). Why do people watch others eat food? An empirical study on the motivations and practices of mukbang viewers. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376567
[5]
Avgustis, I., & Oloff, F. (2023). Mundane Food Photography. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v6i2.125292
[6]
Broth, M., Laurier, E., & Mondada, L. (Eds.). (2014). Studies of video practices: Video at work. Routledge.
[7]
Barua, H. B., Pramanick, P., Sarkar, C., & Mg, T. H. (2020). Let me join you! real-time F-formation recognition by a socially aware robot. 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). https://doi.org/10.1109/ro-man47096.2020.9223469
[8]
Bruno, A. L., & Chung, S. (2017). mokpang: Pay me and I'll show you how much I can eat for your pleasure. Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema, 9(2), 155--171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17564905.2017.1368150
[9]
Casperson, S. L., Sieling, J., Moon, J., Johnson, L., Roemmich, J. N., & Whigham, L. (2015). A mobile phone food record app to digitally capture dietary intake for adolescents in a free-living environment: Usability study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3324
[10]
Choe, H. (2019). Eating together multimodally: Collaborative eating in mukbang, a Korean livestream of eating. Language in Society, 48(2), 171--208. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404518001355
[11]
Choe, H. (2020). Talking the cat: Footing lamination in a Korean livestream of cats mukbang. Journal of Pragmatics, 160, 60--79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.009
[12]
Due, B. L., & Licoppe, C. (2021). Video-mediated interaction (VMI). Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i3.123836
[13]
Fischler, C. (2011). Commensality, society and culture. Social Science Information, 50(3--4), 528--548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018411413963
[14]
Florez Marulanda, J. F. (2022). Student satisfaction pilot experience with synchronous classroom live streaming styles during the covid-19 pandemic. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana De Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 17(3), 301--306. https://doi.org/10.1109/rita.2022.3191285
[15]
Goffman, E. (1966). Behavior in public places: Notes on the Social Organization of gatherings. Free Press.
[16]
Goodwin, C. (2019). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.
[17]
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 1--54. https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo
[18]
González Temer, Verónica. (2017). A Multimodal Analysis Of Assessment Sequences In Chilean Spanish Interaction. 10.13140/RG.2.2.15563.03364.
[19]
Goodwin, C., and Goodwin, M.H. (2004) 'Participation', in A. Duranti (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, pp. 222--243. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
[20]
Gambetti, A., & Han, Q. (2022). Camera eats first: Exploring food aesthetics portrayed on social media using Deep Learning. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(9), 3300--3331. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-09--2021--1206
[21]
Herring, S. C. (2013). Relevance in computer-mediated conversation. In S. C. Herring, D. Stein, & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics of computer-mediated communication (pp. 245--268). Berlin: Mouton. Prepublication version: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/relevance.pdf
[22]
Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 (4). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html
[23]
Højlund, S. (2015). Taste as a social sense: Rethinking taste as a cultural activity. Flavour, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2044--7248--4--6
[24]
Hazel, S., Mortensen, K., & Rasmussen, G. (2014). Introduction: A body of resources -- CA studies of Social Conduct. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.007
[25]
Ibrahim, Y. (2015). Food Porn and the invitation to gaze. International Journal of E-Politics, 6(3), 1--12. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijep.2015070101
[26]
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Conversation Analysis, 13--31. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
[27]
Jodén, H., & Strandell, J. (2021). Building viewer engagement through interaction rituals on Twitch.tv. Information, Communication & Society, 25(13), 1969--1986. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1913211
[28]
Kamunen, A. (2019). How to disengage: Suspension, body torque, and Repair. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(4), 406--426. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1657287
[29]
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge University Press.
[30]
Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
[31]
Kendrick, K. H. (2021). The 'other' side of recruitment: Methods of assistance in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 68--82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.015
[32]
Kim, Y. (2020). Eating as a transgression: Multisensorial performativity in the carnal videos of mukbang (eating shows). International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(1), 107--122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920903435
[33]
Kim, J., Choi, S., Kim, H., & An, S. (2021). Binge drinking and obesity-related eating: The moderating roles of the eating broadcast viewing experience among Korean adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 8066. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158066
[34]
Kircaburun, K., Yurdagül, C., Kuss, D., Emirtekin, E., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Problematic mukbang watching and its relationship to disordered eating and internet addiction: A pilot study among emerging adult mukbang watchers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19(6), 2160--2169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00309-w
[35]
Kircaburun, K., Harris, A., Calado, F., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). The psychology of Mukbang watching: A scoping review of the academic and non-academic literature. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19(4), 1190--1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00211-0
[36]
Kang, E., Lee, J., Kim, K. H., & Yun, Y. H. (2020). The popularity of eating broadcast: Content analysis of 'Mukbang' YouTube videos, media coverage, and the health impact of 'Mukbang' on public. Health Informatics Journal, 26(3), 2237--2248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458220901360
[37]
Laurier, E. (2008). Drinking up endings: Conversational Resources of the café. Language & Communication, 28(2), 165--181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2008.01.011
[38]
Lemke, M., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2021). The use of ICT devices as part of the solo eating experience. Appetite, 165, 105297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105297
[39]
Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: 'Talking heads' and the Multimodal Organization of Mobile and Skype Video calls. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(4), 399--429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
[40]
Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2018). Visuality, text and talk, and the systematic organization of interaction in Periscope live video streams. Discourse Studies, 20(5), 637--665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618760606
[41]
Lu, Z., Annett, M., Fan, M., & Wigdor, D. (2019). "I feel it is my responsibility to stream". Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300459
[42]
Latzer, Y., Spivak-Lavi, Z., & Katz, R. (2015). Disordered eating and media exposure among adolescent girls: The role of parental involvement and sense of empowerment. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20(3), 375--391. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2015.1014925
[43]
Lee, D., & Wan, C. (2023). The impact of mukbang live streaming commerce on consumers? overconsumption behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 58(2--3), 198--221. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968231156104
[44]
Leer, J., & Krogager, S. G. S. (2021). Research methods in Digital Food Studies. Routledge.
[45]
Micallef, D., Schivinski, B., Brennan, L., Parker, L., & Jackson, M. (2022). 'what are you eating'? can online game microcelebrities influence what emerging adults eat? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4233222
[46]
Morris, A. M., & Katzman, D. K. (2003). The impact of the media on eating disorders in children and adolescents. Paediatrics & Child Health, 8(5), 287--289. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/8.5.287
[47]
Melville, N., Fairchild, R., & Evans, E. W. (2023). Food Safety Communication in YouTube video recipes. British Food Journal, 125(7), 2628--2643. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-02--2022-0143
[48]
Manoogian, E. N., Wei-Shatzel, J., & Panda, S. (2022). Assessing temporal eating pattern in free living humans through the mycircadianclock app. International Journal of Obesity, 46(4), 696--706. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-01038--3
[49]
Mcdonnell, E. M. (2016). Food porn: The conspicuous consumption of food in the age of digital reproduction. Food, Media and Contemporary Culture, 239--265. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137463234_14
[50]
Mejova, Y., Abbar, S., & Haddadi, H. (2021). Fetishizing food in Digital age: #foodporn around the world. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 10(1), 250--258. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14710
[51]
M. Hoey, E. (2018). Drinking for speaking: The Multimodal Organization of drinking in conversation. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v1i1.105498
[52]
Meyrowitz, J. (2014). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. Oxford University Press.
[53]
Majlesi, A. R., Ekström, A., & Hydén, L.-C. (2022). Assessments in assisted eating activities. Communication and Medicine, 17(2), 134--149. https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.18648
[54]
Margutti, P., Tainio, L., Drew, P., & Traverso, V. (2018). Invitations and responses across different languages: Observations on the feasibility and relevance of a cross-linguistic comparative perspective on the study of actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 125, 52--61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.010
[55]
Mondada, L. (2009). The embodied and negotiated production of assessments in instructed actions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 329--361. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903296473
[56]
Mondada, L. (2018a). The multimodal Interactional Organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in Gourmet Shops. Discourse Studies, 20(6), 743--769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618793439
[57]
Mondada, L. (2018b). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85--106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
[58]
Mondada, L. (2019a). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47--62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
[59]
Mondada, L. (2019b). Rethinking bodies and objects in social interaction: A multimodal and multisensorial approach to tasting. Discussing New Materialism, 109--134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--658--22300--7_6
[60]
Mondada, L. (2020a). Audible sniffs: Smelling-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 140--163. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1716592
[61]
Mondada, L. (2020b). Orchestrating multi'sensoriality in tasting sessions: Sensing Bodies, normativity, and language. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 63--86. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.472
[62]
Mondada, L. (2021). Language and the sensing body: How sensoriality permeates syntax in interaction. Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.664430
[63]
Mondada, L. (2023). Tasting vs. eating: The Methodic and situated differentiation of embodied multisensorial activities in social interaction. Complexity of Interaction, 29--64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-031--30727-0_2
[64]
Marshall, P., Rogers, Y., & Pantidi, N. (2011). Using F-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958893
[65]
Niewiadomski, R., Ceccaldi, E., Huisman, G., Volpe, G., & Mancini, M. (2019). Computational commensality: From theories to computational models for social food preparation and consumption in HCI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00119
[66]
Ochs, E., Pontecorvo, C., & Fasulo, A. (1996). Socializing taste. Ethnos, 61(1--2), 7--46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.1996.9981526
[67]
Ogden, R. (2021). Swallowing in conversation. Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.657190
[68]
Pathi, S. K., Kristoffersson, A., Kiselev, A., & Loutfi, A. (2019). F-formations for social interaction in simulation using virtual agents and Mobile Robotic Telepresence Systems. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(4), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3040069
[69]
Pomerantz, A. (1985). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. Structures of Social Action, 57--101. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511665868.008
[70]
Pomerantz, A.M., & Mandelbaum, J. (2016). Advocating healthy eating through interpersonal interaction. Talk presented at the 102nd convention of the National Communications Association. 10--13 November 2016. Philadelphia, USA.
[71]
Panicker, A., Basu, K., & Chung, C.-F. (2020). Changing roles and contexts: Symbolic interactionism in the sharing of food and eating practices between remote, intergenerational family members. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW1), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392848
[72]
Pereira, B., Sung, B., & Lee, S. (2019). I like watching other people eat: A cross-cultural analysis of the antecedents of attitudes towards Mukbang. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(2), 78--90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.03.001
[73]
Qu, L. (2021). Waste on the tip of the tongue: Social Eating Livestreams (chibo) in the age of Chinese affluence. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 8(1--2), 43--69. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312--12340131
[74]
Raymond, G., & Lerner, G. H. (2014). A body and its involvements. Multiactivity in Social Interaction, 227--246. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.08ray
[75]
Ruusuvuori, J., & Peräkylä, A. (2009). Facial and verbal expressions in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42(4), 377--394. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903296499
[76]
Rüdiger, Sofia. 2022. "Intimate Consumptions: YouTube Eating Shows and the Performance of Informality." Internet Pragmatics 5(1): 115--142. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00070.rud
[77]
Rüdiger, Sofia. 2021. "Digital Food Talk: Blurring Immediacy and Distance in YouTube Eating Shows." Anglistik 32(2): 111--130. https://doi.org/10.33675/ANGL/2021/2/9 (Open Access)
[78]
Rüdiger, Sofia. 2020. "Dinner for One: The Use of Language in Eating Shows on YouTube." In: Rüdiger, Sofia and Susanne Mühleisen, eds. Talking about Food - The Social and the Global in Eating Communities. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 145--165. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.47.08rud
[79]
Strand, M., & Gustafsson, S. A. (2020). Mukbang and disordered eating: A netnographic analysis of online eating broadcasts. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 44(4), 586--609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09674--6
[80]
Song, L., & Licoppe, C. (2023). Closing live video streams: A sequential analysis. Discourse, Context & Media, 53, 100698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100698
[81]
Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. 1973. Opening Up Closings. Semiotica 8: 289--327.
[82]
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in interaction: A Primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
[83]
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
[84]
Sneijder, P., & te Molder, H. F. M. (2006). Disputing taste: Food pleasure as an achievement in interaction. Appetite, 46(1), 107--116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.10.002
[85]
Sobal, J., & Nelson, M. K. (2003). Commensal eating patterns: A community study. Appetite, 41(2), 181--190. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195--6663(03)00078--3
[86]
Sobal, J. (2000). 'Sociability and the meal: facilitation, commensality, and interaction? in Dimensions of the meal: The science, culture, business, and art of eating. ed. H. Meiselman (Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen), 119--133.
[87]
Spence, C., Mancini, M., & Huisman, G. (2019). Digital commensality: Eating and drinking in the company of Technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02252
[88]
Streeck, J. (2011). The changing meanings of things: Found objects and inscriptions in social interaction. Embodied interaction. language and body in the material world, 67--78.
[89]
Serna, A., Tong, L., Tabard, A., Pageaud, S., & George, S. (2016). F-formations and collaboration dynamics study for designing mobile collocation. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2962656
[90]
González Temer, V, & Ogden, R. (2021). Non-convergent boundaries and action ascription in multimodal interaction. Open Linguistics, 7(1), 685--706. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0170
[91]
Tidy, J. (2020, August 20). Mukbang: Why is China clamping down on eating influencers? BBC News. Retrieved November 22, 2022, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53840167
[92]
Tong, L., Serna, A., Pageaud, S., George, S., & Tabard, A. (2016). It's not how you stand, it's how you move. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935343
[93]
Wiggins, S. (2002). Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory mmms and the embodiment of pleasure. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 35(3), 311--336. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3503_3
[94]
Wiggins, S., & Keevallik, L. (2020). Enacting gustatory pleasure on behalf of another: The multimodal coordination of infant tasting practices. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 87--111. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.527
[95]
Xu, J., Qu, L., & Zhang, G. (2022). Governing social eating (chibo) influencers: Policies, approach and politics of influencer governance in China. Policy & Internet, 14(3), 525--540. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.318
[96]
Yong, J. Y. Y., Tong, E. M. W., & Liu, J. C. J. (2020). When the camera eats first: Exploring how meal-time cell phone photography affects eating behaviours. Appetite, 154, 104787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104787
[97]
Hsiao, C. (2022). Authenticating discourses of 'being oneself' on monetary-motivated livestreams. Discourse, Context & Media, 47, 100592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100592
[98]
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
[99]
Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 21--27). Cambridge University Press.
Index Terms
- "Oh my Dave, your face says it all!": Exploring the Multimodal Practices of Tasting in Live Streaming
Recommendations
Multimodal Practices to Sustain Multiactivity When Live Streaming
IMX '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media ExperiencesLive streaming with mobile phones is a common practice where streamers and viewers use various resources for interaction. Based on the method of multimodal conversation analysis, we examine recordings of a clay sculptor's live streams on a Chinese social ...
A Preliminary Study of Emotional Contagion in Live Streaming
CSCW '20 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2020 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingLive streaming is an increasingly popular communication medium that allows real-time interaction among a broadcaster and an audience of any size. Using archived YouTube live video transcripts and associated live chat messages, we find evidence for ...
Live Streaming as Co-Performance: Dynamics between Center and Periphery in Theatrical Engagement
Live streaming is a highly participatory form of performance, involving various types of audience participation such as liking, commenting, and gifting. But how do streamers and audiences collaborate to deliver live streaming performances? We approach ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2024
1136 pages
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 24 September 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue MHCI
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 253Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)253
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)55
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in