Not the Law's First Rodeo: Towards regulating trustworthy collaborative industrial embodied autonomous systems
Article No.: 15, Pages 1 - 10
Abstract
Does the law stifle technology adoption? At the surface, it may appear to be that there is a regulatory gap and, therefore, such uncertainty can hinder the development and deployment of collaborative industrial embodied autonomous systems (Cobots). Cobots are a class of robots which, unlike other forms of industrial robots, have seemingly introduced new legal challenges due to the direct human-robot collaboration factor. In this paper, to shed light on the above, we investigate the gap in the applicability of the current legal frameworks to this technology from the UK and EU regulatory approaches. We argue that the current law is applicable in regulating this technology given the state of the art. We discuss implications for the regulation to enhance trust and responsible future adoption of Cobots.
References
[1]
Ali Al-Yacoub, Achim Buerkle, Myles Flanagan, Pedro Ferreira, Ella-Mae Hubbard, and Niels Lohse. 2020. Effective human-robot collaboration through wearable sensors. In 2020 25th IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA), Vol. 1. IEEE, 651–658.
[2]
Rachid Alami, Alin Albu-Schäffer, Antonio Bicchi, Rainer Bischoff, Raja Chatila, Alessandro De Luca, Agostino De Santis, Georges Giralt, Jérémie Guiochet, Gerd Hirzinger, 2006. Safe and dependable physical human-robot interaction in anthropic domains: State of the art and challenges. In 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 1–16.
[3]
Syed Sultan Ali, David Bailey, Lisa De Propris, and Giovanna Guzzo. 2019. An industrial policy for EU New Manufacturing. (2019), 56. http://www.makers-rise.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Policy-Report-May-2019.pdf
[4]
Giovanni Buizza Avanzini, Nicola Maria Ceriani, Andrea Maria Zanchettin, Paolo Rocco, and Luca Bascetta. 2014. Safety control of industrial robots based on a distributed distance sensor. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 22, 6 (2014), 2127–2140.
[5]
Mohamad Bdiwi. 2014. Integrated sensors system for human safety during cooperating with industrial robots for handing-over and assembling tasks. Procedia Cirp 23 (2014), 65–70.
[6]
Andrea Bertolini and Francesca Episcopo. 2021. The expert Group’s report on liability for artificial Intelligence and other emerging digital technologies: A critical assessment. European Journal of Risk Regulation 12, 3 (2021), 644–659.
[7]
Margaret Boden, Joanna Bryson, Darwin Caldwell, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Lilian Edwards, Sarah Kember, Paul Newman, Vivienne Parry, Geoff Pegman, Tom Rodden, 2017. Principles of robotics: regulating robots in the real world. Connection Science 29, 2 (2017), 124–129.
[8]
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee. 1957. 1 WLR 582. (1957).
[9]
Roger Brownsword. 2022. Rethinking Law, Regulation, and Technology. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800886476
[10]
Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, and Karen Yeung. 2017. The Oxford handbook of law, regulation and technology. Oxford University Press.
[11]
Jenny Burke, Michael Coovert, Robin Murphy, Jennifer Riley, and Erika Rogers. 2006. Human-robot factors: Robots in the workplace. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 50. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 870–874.
[12]
Ryan Calo. 2015. Robotics and the Lessons of Cyberlaw. California Law Review (2015), 513–563.
[13]
Bryan Casey. 2019. Robot Ipsa Loquitur. Georgetown Law Journal 108 (2019), 225–286.
[14]
Civil Law Rules on Robotics. 2017. European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)) (OJ C 252, 18.7.2018, p.239–257).
[15]
Jay Dixon, Bryan Hong, and Lynn Wu. 2021. The robot revolution: Managerial and employment consequences for firms. Management Science 67, 9 (2021), 5586–5605.
[16]
Frank H Easterbrook. 1996. Cyberspace and the Law of the Horse. U. Chi. Legal F. (1996), 207.
[17]
Horst Eidenmuller. 2019. Machine performance and human failure: how shall we regulate autonomous machines. J. Bus. & Tech. L. 15 (2019), 109.
[18]
Regulation (EU). 2016/679. of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88). https://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
[19]
Regulation (EU). 2023/1230. of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery and repealing Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 73/361/EEC (OJ L 165, 29.6.2023, p.1–102).
[20]
Jonathan Follett. 2014. Designing for emerging technologies: UX for genomics, robotics, and the internet of things. " O’Reilly Media, Inc.".
[21]
Jeff Fryman and Bjoern Matthias. 2012. Safety of industrial robots: From conventional to collaborative applications. In ROBOTIK 2012; 7th German Conference on Robotics. VDE, 1–5.
[22]
Ben Gardner. [n. d.]. Legal, contractual and ethical issues arise from increased robotics in manufacturing, says expert. Pinsent Masons ([n. d.]).
[23]
Alice Guerra, Francesco Parisi, and Daniel Pi. 2022. Liability for robots I: legal challenges. Journal of Institutional Economics 18, 3 (2022), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000825
[24]
Alice Guerra, Francesco Parisi, and Daniel Pi. 2022. Liability for robots II: an economic analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics 18, 4 (2022), 553–568.
[25]
Health and Safety at Work etc. Act. 1974. 1974 CHAPTER 37.
[26]
Jochen Heinzmann and Alexander Zelinsky. 2003. Quantitative safety guarantees for physical human-robot interaction. The International Journal of Robotics Research 22, 7-8 (2003), 479–504.
[27]
F Patrick Hubbard. 2014. Sophisticated robots: balancing liability, regulation, and innovation. Fla. L. Rev. 66 (2014), 1803.
[28]
Eija Kaasinen, Anu-Hanna Anttila, Päivi Heikkilä, Jari Laarni, Hanna Koskinen, and Antti Väätänen. 2022. Smooth and resilient human–machine teamwork as an Industry 5.0 design challenge. Sustainability 14, 5 (2022), 2773.
[29]
Richard Kelley, Enrique Schaerer, Micaela Gomez, and Monica Nicolescu. 2010. Liability in robotics: An international perspective on robots as animals. Advanced Robotics 24, 13 (2010), 1861–1871.
[30]
Johan Kildal, Alberto Tellaeche, Izaskun Fernández, and Iñaki Maurtua. 2018. Potential users’ key concerns and expectations for the adoption of cobots. Procedia CIRP 72 (2018), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.104
[31]
Dana Kulić and Elizabeth A Croft. 2006. Real-time safety for human–robot interaction. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 54, 1 (2006), 1–12.
[32]
Ronald Leenes, Erica Palmerini, Bert-Jaap Koops, Andrea Bertolini, Pericle Salvini, and Federica Lucivero. 2017. Regulatory challenges of robotics: some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innovation and Technology 9, 1 (2017), 1–44.
[33]
Ronald Leenes, Erica Palmerini, Bert-Jaap Koops, Andrea Bertolini, Pericle Salvini, and Federica Lucivero. 2017. Regulatory challenges of robotics: some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innovation and Technology 9, 1 (Jan. 2017), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1304921
[34]
Lawrence Lessig. 1999. The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach. Harvard Law Review 113, 2 (1999), 501–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342331 Publisher: The Harvard Law Review Association.
[35]
Lawrence Lessig. 2009. Code: And other laws of cyberspace. ReadHowYouWant.com.
[36]
Shufei Li, Pai Zheng, Sichao Liu, Zuoxu Wang, Xi Vincent Wang, Lianyu Zheng, and Lihui Wang. 2023. Proactive human–robot collaboration: Mutual-cognitive, predictable, and self-organising perspectives. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 81 (2023), 102510.
[37]
William Li, Pablo Azar, David Larochelle, Phil Hill, and Andrew W Lo. 2015. Law is code: a software engineering approach to analyzing the United States code. J. Bus. & Tech. L. 10 (2015), 297.
[38]
Hong Liu, Xuezhi Deng, and Hongbin Zha. 2005. A planning method for safe interaction between human arms and robot manipulators. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2724–2730.
[39]
Tambiama Madiega. 2023. Artificial intelligence liability directive. Technical Report. European Parliamentary. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/739342/EPRS_BRI(2023)739342_EN.pdf PE 739.342.
[40]
Thomas J Miceli. 2017. Economic models of law. The Oxford handbook of law and economics 1 (2017), 9–28.
[41]
Joseph E. Michaelis, Amanda Siebert-Evenstone, David Williamson Shaffer, and Bilge Mutlu. 2020. Collaborative or Simply Uncaged? Understanding Human-Cobot Interactions in Automation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Honolulu, HI, USA,) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376547
[42]
Vladimir Murashov, Frank Hearl, and John Howard. 2016. Working safely with robot workers: Recommendations for the new workplace. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene 13, 3 (2016), D61–D71.
[43]
Ugo Pagallo. 2018. Vital, Sophia, and Co.—The quest for the legal personhood of robots. Information 9, 9 (2018), 230.
[44]
Frank Pasquale. 2015. The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
[45]
Maithili Patel, Aswin Gururaj Prakash, and Sonia Chernova. 2023. Predicting Routine Object Usage for Proactive Robot Assistance. In Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 1068–1083.
[46]
Aslam Pervez and Jeha Ryu. 2008. Safe physical human robot interaction-past, present and future. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 22, 3 (March 2008), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-007-1109-3
[47]
Pinsent Mason. 2016. Future of Manufacturing: The emerging legal challenges. Technical Report. Pinsent Mason. https://www.pinsentmasons.com/PDF/2016/Future-of-Manufacturing-Winter-2016.pdf
[48]
Aida Ponce. 2017. A Law on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in the EU?ETUI Research Paper-Foresight Brief (2017).
[49]
ISO/TC 299 Robotics. 2016. ISO/TS 15066:2016 Robots and robotic devices — Collaborative robots. https://www.iso.org/standard/62996.html
[50]
Martin J. Rosenstrauch and Jörg Krüger. 2017. Safe human-robot-collaboration-introduction and experiment using ISO/TS 15066. In 2017 3rd International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR). 740–744. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAR.2017.7942795
[51]
Matthew Rueben, Alexander Mois Aroyo, Christoph Lutz, Johannes Schmölz, Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel, Andrea Corti, Siddharth Agrawal, and William D Smart. 2018. Themes and research directions in privacy-sensitive robotics. In 2018 IEEE workshop on advanced robotics and its social impacts (ARSO). IEEE, 77–84.
[52]
Panagiota Tsarouchi, Alexandros-Stereos Matthaiakis, Sotiris Makris, and George Chryssolouris. 2017. On a human-robot collaboration in an assembly cell. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 30, 6 (2017), 580–589.
[53]
Susan Vargas. 2018. Robots in the Workplace. https://www.safetyandhealthmagazine.com/articles/16789-robots-in-the-workplace
[54]
Milos Vasic and Aude Billard. 2013. Safety issues in human-robot interactions. In 2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 197–204.
[55]
Sandra Wachter and Brent Mittelstadt. 2019. A right to reasonable inferences: re-thinking data protection law in the age of big data and AI. Colum. Bus. L. Rev. (2019), 494.
[56]
Gerhard Wagner. 2019. Robot, inc.: personhood for autonomous systems?Fordham L. Rev. 88 (2019), 591.
[57]
Christiane Wendehorst. 2020. Strict liability for AI and other emerging technologies. Journal of European Tort Law 11, 2 (2020), 150–180.
[58]
Alan FT Winfield, Katie Winkle, Helena Webb, Ulrik Lyngs, Marina Jirotka, and Carl Macrae. 2021. Robot accident investigation: a case study in responsible robotics. Software engineering for robotics (2021), 165–187.
[59]
Choon Yue Wong and Gerald Seet. 2017. Workload, awareness and automation in multiple-robot supervision. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 14, 3 (2017), 1729881417710463.
[60]
T Wosch, Werner Neubauer, GV Wichert, and Zsolt Kemény. 2002. Robot motion control for assistance tasks. In Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 524–529.
[61]
Karen Yeung. 2019. Regulation by blockchain: the emerging battle for supremacy between the code of law and code as law. The Modern Law Review 82, 2 (2019), 207–239.
[62]
A Yoganandhan, G Rajesh Kanna, SD Subhash, and J Hebinson Jothi. 2021. Retrospective and prospective application of robots and artificial intelligence in global pandemic and epidemic diseases. Vacunas (English Edition) 22, 2 (2021), 98–105.
[63]
Sangseok You and Lionel P. Robert Jr.2018. Human-Robot Similarity and Willingness to Work with a Robotic Co-worker. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171281
[64]
Paulius Čerka, Jurgita Grigienė, and Gintarė Sirbikytė. 2017. Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems?Computer Law & Security Review 33, 5 (Oct. 2017), 685–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.022
Index Terms
- Not the Law's First Rodeo: Towards regulating trustworthy collaborative industrial embodied autonomous systems
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Cloud robotics law and regulation
AbstractThis paper assesses some of the key legal and regulatory questions arising from the integration of physical robotic systems with cloud-based services, also called “cloud robotics.” The literature on legal and ethical issues in robotics ...
Highlights- Cloud robotics include possible risk transfers between physical and cyber elements.
Digital Rights Management System in China: Challenges and Opportunities
In the era of technology, the Chinese government wants to adopt the latest technologies and interlink their processes to secure information of all stakeholders. Digital rights management DRM is one form of computerized system of copyright to protect ...
Addressing Trust and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots in Human-Robot Collaborative Scenarios: Insights from the Industrial Work Setting
PETRA '24: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive EnvironmentsRecent advancements in Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) have brought to light the significance of ethical, psychological, and attitudinal factors in advanced work and industrial settings, whereby collaborative robots assist humans in work tasks. In these ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2024
335 pages
ISBN:9798400709890
DOI:10.1145/3686038
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 16 September 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- UK Trustworthy Autonomous Systems Hub
- Horizon Centre for Doctoral Training at the University of Nottingham
Conference
TAS '24
TAS '24: Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems
September 16 - 18, 2024
TX, Austin, USA
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 154Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)154
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)44
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in