skip to main content
10.1145/3686038.3686063acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagestasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract
Open access

Investigating the Impact of Generative AI on Students and Educators: Evidence and Insights from the Literature

Published: 16 September 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has become one of the main concerns of knowledge workers due to its ability to mimic realistic human reasoning and creativity. However, this integration raises critical concerns about trust and ethics, which are crucial in shaping both the acceptance and effective utilisation of these technologies. There are many reports, articles and papers currently exploring the opportunities and challenges of LLMs in higher education from the perspective of students and educators. However, these papers often focus on specific contexts like in the UK, US or a particular institutions. In this paper, we examine the problems of generative AI in higher education from educator and student perspectives using scientometrics and text analysis to provide an overview of the research landscape, followed by a narrative review and thematic analysis of selected literature. Some findings of this work are: (1) Students and educators found different ways to use generative AI. Students focus more on using it as an assistant (revising and preparing for lectures, helping with homework) and educators as a content production assistant (writing lecture notes, personalising content). Commonalities are that both students and educators use generative AI as an accessibility aid, e.g., to rephrase sentences or explain concepts. (2) The main concerns of higher education regarding generative AI are equity in access, clarity of rules regarding usage, and job displacement.

References

[1]
Claus Boye Asmussen and Charles Møller. 2019. Smart literature review: a practical topic modelling approach to exploratory literature review. Journal of Big Data 6, 1 (2019), 1–18.
[2]
David Baidoo-Anu and Leticia Owusu Ansah. 2023. Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI 7, 1 (2023), 52–62.
[3]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis.American Psychological Association.
[4]
Erik Cambria, Dipankar Das, Sivaji Bandyopadhyay, Antonio Feraco, 2017. A practical guide to sentiment analysis. Vol. 5. Springer.
[5]
Chaka Chaka. 2023. Detecting AI content in responses generated by ChatGPT, YouChat, and Chatsonic: The case of five AI content detection tools. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching 6, 2 (2023).
[6]
Ramon Dijkstra, Zülküf Genç, Subhradeep Kayal, Jaap Kamps, 2022. Reading Comprehension Quiz Generation using Generative Pre-trained Transformers. In iTextbooks@ AIED. 4–17.
[7]
Yutao Feng, Jipeng Qiang, Yun Li, Yunhao Yuan, and Yi Zhu. 2023. Sentence simplification via large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11957 (2023).
[8]
Rossella Ferrari. 2015. Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical writing 24, 4 (2015), 230–235.
[9]
Mehmet Firat. 2023. How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education? (2023).
[10]
Fiona French, David Levi, Csaba Maczo, Aiste Simonaityte, Stefanos Triantafyllidis, and Gergo Varda. 2023. Creative use of OpenAI in education: case studies from game development. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 7, 8 (2023), 81.
[11]
Ludmila Ivancheva. 2008. Scientometrics today: A methodological overview. Collnet journal of scientometrics and information management 2, 2 (2008), 47–56.
[12]
Tannon Kew, Alison Chi, Laura Vásquez-Rodríguez, Sweta Agrawal, Dennis Aumiller, Fernando Alva-Manchego, and Matthew Shardlow. 2023. BLESS: Benchmarking large language models on sentence simplification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15773 (2023).
[13]
David R Krathwohl. 2002. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice 41, 4 (2002), 212–218.
[14]
Philippe Laban, Chien-Sheng Wu, Lidiya Murakhovs’ ka, Wenhao Liu, and Caiming Xiong. 2022. Quiz design task: Helping teachers create quizzes with automated question generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01730 (2022).
[15]
Weng Marc Lim, Asanka Gunasekara, Jessica Leigh Pallant, Jason Ian Pallant, and Ekaterina Pechenkina. 2023. Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The international journal of management education 21, 2 (2023), 100790.
[16]
Mengqi Liu and Faten M’hiri. 2024. Beyond Traditional Teaching: Large Language Models as Simulated Teaching Assistants in Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 743–749.
[17]
Henrik Skaug Sætra. 2023. Generative AI: Here to stay, but for good?Technology in Society 75 (2023), 102372.
[18]
Andreas Säuberli and Simon Clematide. 2024. Automatic generation and evaluation of reading comprehension test items with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07720 (2024).
[19]
Jaromir Savelka, Arav Agarwal, Marshall An, Chris Bogart, and Majd Sakr. 2023. Thrilled by Your Progress! Large Language Models (GPT-4) No Longer Struggle to Pass Assessments in Higher Education Programming Courses. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.10073 (2023).
[20]
Omar Tayan, Ali Hassan, Khaled Khankan, and Sanaa Askool. 2023. Considerations for adapting higher education technology courses for AI large language models: A critical review of the impact of ChatGPT. Machine Learning with Applications (2023), 100513.
[21]
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
[22]
Kamyar Zeinalipour and Yusuf Gökberk. 2024. Automating Turkish Educational Quiz Generation Using Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03397 (2024).
[23]
Xuesong Zhai, Xiaoyan Chu, Ching Sing Chai, Morris Siu Yung Jong, Andreja Istenic, Michael Spector, Jia-Bao Liu, Jing Yuan, and Yan Li. 2021. A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity 2021, 1 (2021), 8812542.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Enhancement and assessment in the AI age: An extended mind perspectiveJournal of Pacific Rim Psychology10.1177/1834490924130937619Online publication date: 2-Jan-2025

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
TAS '24: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems
September 2024
335 pages
ISBN:9798400709890
DOI:10.1145/3686038
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 September 2024

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

TAS '24

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)698
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)149
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Enhancement and assessment in the AI age: An extended mind perspectiveJournal of Pacific Rim Psychology10.1177/1834490924130937619Online publication date: 2-Jan-2025

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media