Uneven Eyes: The Impact of Inconsistent Local Surveillance Policies on Public Trust
Article No.: 34, Pages 1 - 5
Abstract
Smart city cameras are increasingly employed for various purposes, ranging from personal use to public safety. However, their use raises significant concerns about privacy, civil liberties, and transparency. This project examines the impact of smart city cameras within urban environments, focusing on how local values influence public perception and the handling of data collected through these systems. The study also investigates how municipalities with surveillance ordinances navigate the balance between leveraging advanced technologies for public safety and addressing potential civil rights issues. By analyzing ordinances, their implementation, and the public reports produced by various U.S. cities, this research highlights inconsistencies in policy enforcement and public engagement. The findings suggest that while these ordinances aim to enhance accountability and transparency, many cities fail to meet their reporting obligations, potentially undermining public trust. The study emphasizes the importance of citizen involvement in shaping and overseeing surveillance policies to ensure they align with community values and protect individual rights.
References
[1]
ACLU. March 2002. What's Wrong with Public Video Surveillance? American Civil Liberties Union. https://www.aclu.org/other/whats-wrong-public-video-surveillance.
[2]
Nellie Bowles. 2020. July 10. Why Is a Tech Executive Installing Security Cameras around San Francisco? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/10/business/camera-surveillance-san-francisco.html
[3]
Manuel Castells. 1989. The Informational City: Information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
[4]
Ari Chivukula and Tyler Takemoto. February 2021. Local Surveillance Oversight Ordinances. Samuelson Clinic Student White Paper. Berkeley: Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic. https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Local- Surveillance-Ordinances-White-Paper.pdf.
[5]
Virginia Eubanks. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press
[6]
Andrew Ferguson. 2020. Structural Sensor Surveillance, Iowa Law Review, 106(1),47–112.
[7]
Marilyn Fidler. 2020. Local police surveillance and the administrative Fourth Amendment. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 36(5), 481-561. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/vol36/iss5/2
[8]
Helen Nissenbaum. 2009. Privacy in Context: Technology, policy and the integrity of social life. Sanford CA: Stanford University Press.
[9]
Gemma Galdon-Clavell. 2013. (Not so) Smart Cities?: The Drivers, Impact and Risks of Surveillance- Enabled Smart Environments. Science & Public Policy, 40(6), 717–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct070.
[10]
Ben Green. 2019. The Smart Enough City: Putting technology in its place to reclaim our urban future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[11]
Stephen Kuciemba & Kathleen Swindler. March 2016. Transportation Management Center Video Recording and Archiving Best General Practices. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop16033/chap2.htm.
[12]
William Mitchell. 1995. City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn. London: MIT Press. Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
[13]
Alison Powell. 2021. Undoing Optimization: Civic action in smart cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
[14]
David Solove. 2004. The Digital Person: Technology and privacy in the information age. New York: NYU Press.
[15]
Sharon Strover. Tiancheng Cao, Maria Esteva.& Soyoung Park. 2021. Smart Cities and Ethical Policies: The Challenges of Public Cameras and AI. TPRC49: The 49th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898220
[16]
Anthony Townsend. 2014. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
[17]
Samuel Warren, S., & Brandeis, L. 19890. The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5), 193-220.
[18]
Alan Westin. 1967. Privacy and Freedom. New York, NY: Athenum
[19]
Cedric Whitney, Teresa Naval, Elizabeth Quepons, Simrandeep Singh, Steven R. Rick, & Lily Irani. L. 2021. HCI Tactics for Politics from Below: Meeting the Challenges of Smart Cities. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445314
[20]
Rebecca Young, Katell, M., & Krafft, P. M. Municipal Surveillance Regulation and Algorithmic Accountability. Big Data & Society 6(2) https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719868492.
[21]
Shoshana Zuboff,. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: NY: Hachette Book Group.
Index Terms
- Uneven Eyes: The Impact of Inconsistent Local Surveillance Policies on Public Trust
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Public Policies on eParticipation in Austria
ePart '09: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Electronic ParticipationThis paper assesses the status of eParticipation within the political system in Austria. It takes a top-down perspective focusing on the role of public participation and public policies on eParticipation. The status of eParticipation in Austria as well ...
Is Public Trust in Government Associated With Trust in E-Government?
The term e-government describes the use of information and communications technology, particularly the Internet, for the delivery of public services. As governments invest in e-government, there is only limited knowledge of the extent of public trust in ...
Citizenship, trust, and behavioural intentions to use public e-services
An empirical study conducted to identify determinants of user acceptance for e-government services in Lebanon.The model examines the relationship of two independent variables, active citizenship and trustworthiness, with a dependent variable, ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2024
335 pages
ISBN:9798400709890
DOI:10.1145/3686038
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 16 September 2024
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
TAS '24
TAS '24: Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems
September 16 - 18, 2024
TX, Austin, USA
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 93Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)93
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)37
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in