skip to main content
10.1145/368640.368719acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesslipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

On the relevance of wire load models

Published:01 March 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wire load models (WLMs) are generally perceived to be inaccurate and inadequate for good optimization. The traditional wisdom is that accuracy of WLMs will worsen as die sizes expand and feature sizes shrink, and as wire loads become less predictable and more dominant over pin loads. In many industry white papers and academic works, the weaknesses of WLMs are used to motivate the unification of logic synthesis and physical layout into a single tool. We believe, however, that care must be taken in how we derive our motivations for new flows. In previous studies, evidence against WLMs was generally anecdotal or based on limited data (e.g., from a single design). Today, the maturation of Cadence Design Systems' PKS design tool affords us a unique opportunity to study WLMs in greater depth, and to quantify the timing improvements achieved by the unification of synthesis and layout. Using PKS, we have performed extensive experiments on fifteen real industry test cases. Our results confirm much of the conventional wisdom about WLMs, but also indicate that WLMs probably can still perform a useful function in the design flow.

References

  1. 1.K. D. Boese, A. B. Kahng, B. A. McCoy and G. Robins, "Toward Optimal Routing Trees", Proc. ACM SIGDA Physical Design Workshop, April 1993, pp. 44-51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.K. D. Boese, A. B. Kahng, B. A. McCoy and G. Robins, "Fidelity and Near-Optimality of Elmore-Based Routing Constructions", Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Computer Design, October 1993, pp. 81-84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3.S. Bodapati and F. N. Najm, "Pre-Layout Estimation of Individual Wire Lengths", ACM Intl. Workshop on System-Level Interconnect Prediction, April 2000, pp. 93-98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.L. Hagen, J. H. Huang and A. B. Kahng, "Quantified Suboptimality of VLSI Layout Heuristics", Proc. ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conf., 1995, pp. 216-221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.A. B. Kahng and S. Muddu, "Improved Effective Capacitance Computations for Use in Logic and Layout Optimization", Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on VLSI Design, 1999, pp. 578-582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Synopsys, Inc., Liberty User Guide, Version 1999, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.A. Lu, H. Eisenmann, G. Stenz and F. M. Johannes, "Combining technology mapping with post-placement resynthesis for performance optimization", Proc. Intl. Conf. on Computer Design, October 1998, pp. 616-621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.L. Scheffer and E. Nequist, "Why Interconnect Prediction Doesn't Work", ACM Intl. Workshop on System-Level Interconnect Prediction, April 2000, pp. 139-144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.I. Sutherland, R. Sproull and D. Harris, Logical Effort: Designing Fast CMOS Circuits, San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the relevance of wire load models

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SLIP '01: Proceedings of the 2001 international workshop on System-level interconnect prediction
              March 2001
              178 pages
              ISBN:1581133154
              DOI:10.1145/368640

              Copyright © 2001 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 March 2001

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate6of8submissions,75%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader