skip to main content
10.1145/3686852.3687070acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Examining the Differences in Three Computing Fields with High School Students

Published: 08 December 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Anecdotal evidence from admissions visits and conversations with students suggested that high school students received little to no guidance from school counselors and teachers on the differences between computer science (CS), computer engineering (CmpE), and information technology (IT) or the high school coursework needed to position students for success. Retention rates in these undergraduate computing degree programs were impacted by this lack of information and guidance, with local four-year graduation rates in just above 20% and four-year retention rates hovering just above 50%. Many of those students had selected the wrong major for their personal interests or career goals. To address this problem prior to attending a university, an interdisciplinary research team consisting of four faculty members from CS, CmpE, and IT and a fifth from education (EDU) developed the one-week Summer Computing Camp (SCC) for high school students. The SCC curriculum aimed to increase students' understanding of computing-related majors and to promote higher education in computing fields. Campers received daily instruction on the core components of CS, CmpE, and IT and practical experience in each through hands-on laboratories. Specific skills developed include computer programming in Python, basics of electrical circuits, integrating computer hardware and software, computer networking, and cyber security. Campers were introduced to computing careers and majors through presentations and guest speakers during the Lunch and Learn time. At the end of the week, teams of campers applied these skills to an Internet of Things-themed Capstone project, which they presented to their peers and parents. Pre- and post-surveys and tests provided evidence that camp participants increased their understanding of the differences between CS, CmpE, and IT as well as the career trajectories associated with each. Evidence also suggests that camp participants left the program more confident as to which computing field they were most interested in pursuing.

References

[1]
Gerald Engel, John Impagliazzo, and Patrick LaMalva. 2010. A brief history of the computing sciences accreditation board (CSAB) promoting quality education in the computing fields. ACM Inroads 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1805724.1805740
[2]
Commission on Engineering Education. 1968. Computer science in electrical engineering. IEEE Spectrum 5, 3.
[3]
CC2020 Task Force. 2020. Computing Curricula 2020: Paradigms for Global Computing Education. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
[4]
ACM Data Science Task Force. 2021. Computing competencies for undergraduate data science curricula. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453538
[5]
Ed Anthony 2003. Computing education in academia: Toward differentiating the disciplines. City.
[6]
Eric R Banilower, P Sean Smith, Kristen A Malzahn, Courtney L Plumley, Evelyn M Gordon, and Meredith L Hayes. 2018. Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research, Inc.
[7]
Lia D. Falco. 2017. The School Counselor and STEM Career Development. Journal of Career Development 44, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316656445
[8]
Wendy Chi, Patricia Morreale, and Jean Chu. 2023. Increasing School Counselor Awareness of Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569745
[9]
Jill Courte, and Cathy Bishop-Clark. 2009. Do students differentiate between computing disciplines? In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (Chattanooga, TN, USA) (SIGCSE '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 29–33.
[10]
Lecia Barker, Christopher Hovey, and Leisa Thompson. 2014. Results of a large-scale, multi-institutional study of undergraduate retention in computing. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2014. 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044267
[11]
Chris Stephenson, Alison Derbenwick Miller, Christine Alvarado, Lecia Barker, Valerie Barr, Tracy Camp, Carol Frieze, Colleen Lewis, Erin Cannon Mindell, Lee Limbird, Debra Richardson, Mehran Sahami, Elsa Villa, Henry Walker, and Stuart Zweben. 2018. Retention in Computer Science Undergraduate Programs in the U.S.: Data Challenges and Promising Interventions. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY.
[12]
Burcin Tamer, and Jane G Stout. 2016. Recruitment and retention of undergraduate students in computing: Patterns by gender and race/ethnicity.
[13]
L. Moses, C. Hall, K. Wuensch, K. De Urquidi, P. Kauffmann, W. Swart, S. Duncan, and G. Dixon. 2011. Are Math Readiness and Personality Predictive of First-Year Retention in Engineering? The Journal of Psychology 145, 3. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00223980.2011.557749
[14]
Matthew Perkins Coppola, Beomjin Kim, Guoping Wang, Michelle R. Parker, and Thomas J. Bolinger. 2024. Computing Faculty Introducing Secondary Students to Differences in Computing Fields (Work in Progress). In Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2024/06/23, 2024, Portland, Oregon. ASEE Conferences, [insert City of Publication], 20. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–46716
[15]
Sunisa Sathapornvajana and Bunthit Watanapa. 2012. Factors affecting student's intention to choose IT program. Procedia Computer Science 13.
[16]
Xueli Wang. 2013. Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal 50, 5.
[17]
Monica M McGill, Adrienne Decker, and Amber Settle. 2016. Undergraduate students’ perceptions of the impact of pre-college computing activities on choices of major. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 16, 4.
[18]
Sarah L. Ferguson, Kara P. Ieva, Christopher J. Winkler, Kimelle Ash, and Theresa Cann. 2023. How do you know if this is for you? Exploration and awareness of technical STEM careers. School Science and Mathematics 123, 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12577
[19]
Preston T. Mitchell. 2016. Undergraduate motivations for choosing a science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) major.
[20]
Michael E. Battig, and Muhammad Shariq. 2011. A Validation Study of Student Differentiation between Computing Disciplines. Information Systems Education Journal 9
[21]
Timothy Urness, and Eric D Manley. 2013. Generating interest in computer science through middle-school android summer camps. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 28, 5.
[22]
Terri Lenox, Gayle Jesse, and Charles Robert Woratschek. 2012. Factors influencing students decisions to major in a computer-related discipline. Information Systems Education Journal 10, 6.
[23]
Satu Kaleva, Jouni Pursiainen, Mirkka Hakola, Jarmo Rusanen, and Hanni Muukkonen. 2019. Students’ reasons for STEM choices and the relationship of mathematics choice to university admission. International Journal of STEM Education 6.
[24]
Thomas G Zimmerman, David Johnson, Cynthia Wambsgans, and Antonio Fuentes. 2011. Why Latino high school students select computer science as a major: Analysis of a success story. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 11, 2.
[25]
Alpaslan Sahin, and Hersh C Waxman. 2021. Factors affecting high school students’ STEM career interest: Findings from a 4-year study. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 22, 3.
[26]
Carla de Lira, Rachel Wong, and Olusola Adesope. 2022. A systematic review on the effectiveness of programming camps on middle school students' programming knowledge and attitudes of computing. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 38, 1.
[27]
U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2023. Occupational Outlook Handbook, Computer and Information Research Scientists (September 6, 2023). Retrieved January 22 from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/computer-and-information-research-scientists.htm
[28]
Schuyler W. Huck. 2007. Reading Statistics and Research. (5th. ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
[29]
J.W. Creswell. 2008. Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (3rd. ed.). Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[30]
Faith-Michael E. Uzoka, Randy Connolly, Marc Schroeder, Namrata Khemka, and Janet Miller. 2013. Computing is not a rock band: student understanding of the computing disciplines. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education (SIGITE '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/2512276.2512291
[31]
Fiona Redmond. 2022. With a Rise in Computing Disciplines Comes a Greater Choice of Computing Degrees in Higher Education. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling '22), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3564721.3565946
[32]
Carole L. Shook. 2019. Choosing Information Systems as a Major: Factors That Influence Selection. Ed.D., University of Arkansas, United States – Arkansas, 2019.
[33]
Merilin Säde, Reelika Suviste, Piret Luik, Eno Tõnisson, and Marina Lepp. 2019. Factors That Influence Students' Motivation and Perception of Studying Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 873–878. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287395
[34]
Evrikleia Tsagala, and Maria Kordaki. 2005. Essential factors that affect students’ choices to study computer science: Gender differences. Testing/Assessment
[35]
Joyce B Main, Tram Dang, Beata Johnson, Qian Shi, Cesare Guariniello, and Daniel Delaurentis. 2023. Why Students Choose STEM: A Study of High School Factors That Influence College STEM Major Choice. Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–44049
[36]
Carla de Lira, Rachel Wong, Olufunso Oje, Gabriel Nketah, Olusola Adesope, and Alireza Ghods. 2022. Summer Programming Camps–Exploring Project-Based Informal CS Education in a Rural Community. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools 5, 4.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGITE '24: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education
October 2024
185 pages
ISBN:9798400711060
DOI:10.1145/3686852
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 December 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. K-12 summer camp
  2. computer engineering
  3. computer science
  4. computing majors
  5. information technology

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SIGITE '24
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 176 of 429 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 75
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)75
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media