skip to main content
10.1145/3695652.3695663acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimmsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on Selection of Obstruction Strategy and Sales Mode under Competition in E-commerce Platform

Published: 15 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The rapid development of internet technology has led to a large number of suppliers shifting their sales channels online through joining e-commerce platforms. In this paper, we study the obstruction strategies employed by suppliers who have already joined e-commerce platforms in response to potential suppliers, as well as the sales mode choices of these potential suppliers. We construct a two-stage supply chain model consisting of an e-commerce platform and two suppliers. We find that when the opportunity cost of potential supplier is moderate, incumbent supplier can effectively deter their entry by adjusting sales volume or pricing strategies. Successful implementation of these obstruction strategies lead to a reduction in the incumbent supplier’s own profit. We also find that regardless of whether opportunity cost is considered, potential supplier tends to choose the merchant model when their limited capability is low. This preference contradicts the selection of the e-commerce platform. When the potential supplier joins the e-commerce platform in the merchant model, the e-commerce platform always benefits. When product substitutability is high or the commission rate is low, the e-commerce platform’s revenue is lower if the potential supplier enters with an agency model.

References

[1]
Vibhanshu Abhishek, Kinshuk Jerath, and Z John Zhang. 2016. Agency selling or reselling? Channel structures in electronic retailing. Manag.Sci. 62, 8 (2016), 2259–2280.
[2]
Guangyu Cao, Ginger Zhe Jin, Xi Weng, and Li-An Zhou. 2021. Market-expanding or Market-stealing? Competition with network effects in bike-sharing. RAND.J.Econ. 52, 4 (Dec 2021), 778–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12391
[3]
Zong-Hong Cao, Yong-Wu Zhou, Ju Zhao, and Chang-Wen Li. 2015. Entry mode selection and its impact on an incumbent supply chain coordination. J.Retail.Consum.Serv. 26 (Sep 2015), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.04.005
[4]
China Internet Network Information Center. 2023. The 52nd Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. Retrieved August 28, 2023 https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2023/0828/c88-10829.html.
[5]
Dong Wang & Kim Hua TAN Guojun Ji. 2018. A study on external supplier entering deterrence strategy in the dual-channel supply chain. Syst.Eng—n.a. & Pract. 388 (2018), 2230–2241.
[6]
Caixia Hao and Lei Yang. 2023. Resale or agency sale? Equilibrium analysis on the role of live streaming selling. Eur.J.Oper.Res 307, 3 (Jun 2023), 1117–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.09.021
[7]
Tingting He, Dmitri Kuksov, and Chakravarthi Narasimhan. 2017. Free in-network pricing as an entry-deterrence strategy. QME. 15 (Sep 2017), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-017-9185-x
[8]
Özgen Karaer and Feryal Erhun. 2015. Quality and entry deterrence. Eur.J.Oper.Res 240, 1 (Jan 2015), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.016
[9]
A. K. M. Mohsin, Syed Far Abid Hossain, Hasanuzzaman Tushar, Mohammed Masum Iqbal, and Alamgir Hossain. 2021. Differential game model and coordination model for green supply chain based on green technology research and development. HELIYON 7, 8 (Aug 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07811
[10]
Netease. 2023. 130 million Americans shop crazy online every month. Retrieved January 9, 2023 https://m.163.com/dy/article/HQKSC8640552DZD9.html.
[11]
Jiajia Nie, Ling Zhong, Gendao Li, and Kuo Cao. 2022. Piracy as an entry deterrence strategy in software market. Eur.J.Oper.Res 298, 2 (Apr 2022), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.006
[12]
Shuxia Peng, Bo Li, and Shuang Wu. 2023. Presence of piracy and legal protection: Decisions in the digital goods market under different contracts. Eur.J.Oper.Res 309, 2 (Sep 2023), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.01.050
[13]
Sohu. 2023. Amazon seller war: competition intensifies, profits disappear. Retrieved July 20, 2023 https://www.sohu.com/a/704581205_211762.
[14]
Sohu. 2023. Amazon’s product commission is 15%. Retrieved June 22, 2023 https://www.sohu.com/a/689330261_121116985.
[15]
Sohu. 2023. Multi-platform commission rising tide. Retrieved October 6, 2023 http://news.sohu.com/a/726072916_121743131.
[16]
Lin Tian, Asoo J Vakharia, Yinliang Tan, and Yifan Xu. 2018. Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: Strategic analysis of an emerging e-commerce model. Prod.Oper.Manag. 27, 8 (Aug 2018), 1595–1610. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12885
[17]
Meijing Chang Tong Shao, Jie Wei and Zeling Xu. 2022. The study of supplier’s encroachment strategy considering the traditional retailer’s retail services investment. Syst.Eng—n.a. & Pract. 42 (2022), 3335–3348.
[18]
Rajeev K Tyagi. 1999. On the effects of downstream entry. Manga.Sci. 45, 1 (1999), 59–73.
[19]
Atsuo Utaka. 2008. Pricing strategy, quality signaling, and entry deterrence. Int.J.Ind.Organ 26, 4 (Jul 2008), 878–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.07.005
[20]
Tiaojun Xiao and Xiangtong Qi. 2010. Strategic wholesale pricing in a supply chain with a potential entrant. Eur.J.Oper.Res 202, 2 (Apr 2010), 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.023
[21]
Fei Ye, Hui Yan, and Yongzhong Wu. 2019. Optimal online channel strategies for a hotel considering direct booking and cooperation with an online travel agent. Int.T.Oper.Res. 26, 3 (May 2019), 968–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12470
[22]
Fei Ye, Hui Yan, and Wei Xie. 2022. Optimal contract selection for an online travel agent and two hotels under price competition. Int.T.Oper.Res. 29, 2 (Mar 2022), 1274–1307. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12804
[23]
Chuan Zhang and Hui-Min Ma. 2023. E-retailer information sharing with suppliers online selling mode. Inf.Sci. 622 (Apr 2023), 1252–1272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.094
[24]
Shichen Zhang and Jianxiong Zhang. 2020. Agency selling or reselling: E-tailer information sharing with supplier offline entry. Eur.J.Oper.Res 280, 1 (Jan 2020), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.003
[25]
Xumei Zhang, Yi Liu, Bin Dan, Xiaoyu Zha, and Ronghua Sui. 2023. Selling mode choice and information sharing in an online tourism supply chain under channel competition. Electron.Commer.Res. (Jan 2023), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09671-y

Index Terms

  1. Research on Selection of Obstruction Strategy and Sales Mode under Competition in E-commerce Platform

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IMMS '24: Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Information Management and Management Science
      August 2024
      465 pages
      ISBN:9798400716997
      DOI:10.1145/3695652
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 15 October 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. E-Commerce platform
      2. Game theory
      3. Limited capability
      4. Obstruction strategy
      5. Sales model selection

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • the National Natural Science Foundation of China
      • The Youth Innovation Team Program for Higher Educational of Shandong Province of China

      Conference

      IMMS 2024

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 15
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
      Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media