skip to main content
research-article

Modeling Attentive Interaction Behavior for Web Content Identification in Exploratory Information Seeking

Published: 21 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Extracting and collecting information during web exploration is an arduous process, demanding substantial cognitive and physical effort from users. Users must not only determine which content is worth capturing but also manually extract and save it, often disrupting the flow of their learning and exploration. To mitigate it, we propose AIbM (Attentive Interaction Behavior Modeling), which encodes and integrates multiple implicit interaction data to identify fine-grained helpful web content, providing an algorithmic foundation to facilitate automatic information extraction and collection. AIbM captures dynamic patterns of user interactions---specifically eye and mouse movements---by encoding these into images and time series. It further employs graph modeling to exploit relationships between a content block and its adjacent blocks. By incorporating graph attention networks, AIbM efficiently processes both intra-block and inter-block features, improving the identification of helpful web content. Experimental results demonstrate that AIbM achieves the highest F1 score of 82.80% in general helpful content identification, marking improvements of 10.86% over state-of-the-art models like GBT and at least 2.49% over individual modality inputs. These results underscore the potential of our approach to advance tools and systems designed for automated information extraction and collection to facilitate more effective exploratory search experiences.

References

[1]
Yomna Abdelrahman, Anam Ahmad Khan, Joshua Newn, Eduardo Velloso, Sherine Ashraf Safwat, James Bailey, Andreas Bulling, Frank Vetere, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2019. Classifying Attention Types with Thermal Imaging and Eye Tracking. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 3, Article 69 (sep 2019), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351227
[2]
Mikhail S. Ageev, Qi Guo, Dmitry Lagun, and Eugene Agichtein. 2011. Find it if you can: a game for modeling different types of web search success using interaction data. Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval (2011).
[3]
Omar Alonso, Michael Gertz, and Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2009. Clustering and exploring search results using timeline constructions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management. 97--106.
[4]
Ioannis Arapakis and Luis A Leiva. 2016. Predicting user engagement with direct displays using mouse cursor information. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 599--608.
[5]
Ioannis Arapakis and Luis A Leiva. 2020. Learning efficient representations of mouse movements to predict user attention. In Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 1309--1318.
[6]
Alexey Borisov, Ilya Markov, Maarten De Rijke, and Pavel Serdyukov. 2016. A neural click model for web search. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. 531--541.
[7]
Pia Borlund. 2003. The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Inf. Res. 8 (2003).
[8]
Georg Buscher, Edward Cutrell, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2009. What do you see when you're surfing? Using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 21--30.
[9]
Georg Buscher, Andreas R. Dengel, Ralf Biedert, and Ludger van Elst. 2012. Attentive documents: Eye tracking as implicit feedback for information retrieval and beyond. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 1 (2012), 9:1--9:30.
[10]
Georg Buscher, Andreas R. Dengel, and Ludger van Elst. 2008. Eye movements as implicit relevance feedback. CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2008).
[11]
Georg Buscher, Ludger van Elst, and Andreas R. Dengel. 2009. Segment-level display time as implicit feedback: a comparison to eye tracking. Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (2009).
[12]
Joseph Chee Chang, Nathan Hahn, and Aniket Kittur. 2020. Mesh: Scaffolding Comparison Tables for Online Decision Making. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2020).
[13]
Joseph Chee Chang, Nathan Hahn, Adam Perer, and Aniket Kittur. 2019. SearchLens: composing and capturing complex user interests for exploratory search. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2019).
[14]
Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 785--794.
[15]
Xiuge Chen, Namrata Srivastava, Rajiv Jain, Jennifer Healey, and Tilman Dingler. 2023. Characteristics of Deep and Skim Reading on Smartphones vs. Desktop: A Comparative Study. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[16]
Cristina Conati, Sébastien Lallé, Md Abed Rahman, and Dereck Toker. 2020. Comparing and combining interaction data and eye-tracking data for the real-time prediction of user cognitive abilities in visualization tasks. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 10, 2 (2020), 1--41.
[17]
Anita Crescenzi, Austin R. Ward, Yuan Li, and Robert G. Capra. 2021. Supporting Metacognition during Exploratory Search with the OrgBox. Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2021).
[18]
Debora Donato, Francesco Bonchi, Tom Chi, and Yoelle Maarek. 2010. Do you want to take notes?: identifying research missions in Yahoo! search pad. In The Web Conference.
[19]
Mira Dontcheva, Steven Mark Drucker, Geraldine Wade, D. Salesin, and Michael F. Cohen. 2006. Summarizing personal web browsing sessions. In ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology.
[20]
Cynthia Dwork, Frank McSherry, Kobbi Nissim, and Adam Smith. 2006. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In Theory of Cryptography: Third Theory of Cryptography Conference, TCC 2006, New York, NY, USA, March 4-7, 2006. Proceedings 3. Springer, 265--284.
[21]
Fabio Gasparetti. 2017. Modeling user interests from web browsing activities. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 31 (2017), 502--547.
[22]
Mengtian Guo, Zhilan Zhou, David Gotz, and Yue Wang. 2023. Grafs: Graphical faceted search system to support conceptual understanding in exploratory search. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 13, 2 (2023), 1--36.
[23]
Qi Guo and Eugene Agichtein. 2008. Exploring mouse movements for inferring query intent. In Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.
[24]
Qi Guo and Eugene Agichtein. 2010. Ready to buy or just browsing?: detecting web searcher goals from interaction data. Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (2010).
[25]
Qi Guo, Haojian Jin, Dmitry Lagun, Shuai Yuan, and Eugene Agichtein. 2013. Mining touch interaction data on mobile devices to predict web search result relevance. Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (2013).
[26]
Ken Hinckley, Xiaojun Bi, Michel Pahud, and William A.S. Buxton. 2012. Informal information gathering techniques for active reading. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012).
[27]
Orland Hoeber and Soumya Shukla. 2022. A study of visually linked keywords to support exploratory browsing in academic search. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 73, 8 (2022), 1171--1191.
[28]
Andrew Hogue and David R Karger. 2005. Thresher: automating the unwrapping of semantic content from the World Wide Web. In The Web Conference.
[29]
Jeff Huang, Ryen W. White, and Georg Buscher. 2012. User see, user point: gaze and cursor alignment in web search. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012).
[30]
Jeff Huang, Ryen W White, Georg Buscher, and Kuansan Wang. 2012. Improving searcher models using mouse cursor activity. In Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 195--204.
[31]
Zachary Ives, Craig Knoblock, Steve Minton, Marie Jacob, Partha Talukdar, Rattapoom Tuchinda, Jose Luis Ambite, Maria Muslea, and Cenk Gazen. 2009. Interactive data integration through smart copy & paste. arXiv preprint arXiv:0909.1769 (2009).
[32]
Jiepu Jiang, Daqing He, and James Allan. 2014. Searching, browsing, and clicking in a search session: changes in user behavior by task and over time. Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval (2014).
[33]
Yue Jiang, Luis A Leiva, Hamed Rezazadegan Tavakoli, Paul RB Houssel, Julia Kylmälä, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2023. UEyes: Understanding Visual Saliency across User Interface Types. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--21.
[34]
Youngho Kim, Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W White, and Imed Zitouni. 2014. Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. 193--202.
[35]
Aniket Kittur, Andrew M. Peters, Abdigani Diriye, Trupti Telang, and Michael R. Bove. 2013. Costs and benefits of structured information foraging. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2013).
[36]
Andrew Kuznetsov, Joseph Chee Chang, Nathan Hahn, Napol Rachatasumrit, Bradley Breneisen, Julina Coupland, and Aniket Kittur. 2022. Fuse: In-Situ Sensemaking Support in the Browser. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1--15.
[37]
Dmitry Lagun and Eugene Agichtein. 2015. Inferring Searcher Attention by Jointly Modeling User Interactions and Content Salience. Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2015).
[38]
Guohao Lan, Bailey Heit, Tim Scargill, and Maria Gorlatova. 2020. GazeGraph: Graph-based few-shot cognitive context sensing from human visual behavior. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 422--435.
[39]
Xiangsheng Li, Yiqun Liu, Jiaxin Mao, Zexue He, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2018. Understanding Reading Attention Distribution during Relevance Judgement. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (2018).
[40]
Yixuan Li, Pingmei Xu, Dmitry Lagun, and Vidhya Navalpakkam. 2017. Towards measuring and inferring user interest from gaze. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. 525--533.
[41]
Chang Liu, Nicholas J. Belkin, and Michael J. Cole. 2012. Personalization of search results using interaction behaviors in search sessions. In Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.
[42]
Mengyang Liu, Yiqun Liu, Jiaxin Mao, Cheng Luo, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2018. "Satisfaction with Failure" or" Unsatisfied Success" Investigating the Relationship between Search Success and User Satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. 1533--1542.
[43]
Michael Xieyang Liu, Jane Hsieh, Nathan Hahn, Angelina Zhou, Emily Deng, Shaun Burley, Cynthia Bagier Taylor, Aniket Kittur, and Brad A. Myers. 2019. Unakite: Scaffolding Developers' Decision-Making Using the Web. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2019).
[44]
Michael Xieyang Liu, Aniket Kittur, and Brad A. Myers. 2022. Crystalline: Lowering the Cost for Developers to Collect and Organize Information for Decision Making. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2022).
[45]
Yiqun Liu, Chao Wang, Ke Zhou, Jianyun Nie, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2014. From skimming to reading: A two-stage examination model for web search. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on conference on information and knowledge management. 849--858.
[46]
Li Lu, Jiadi Yu, Yingying Chen, Yanmin Zhu, Minglu Li, and Xiangyu Xu. 2019. I3: sensing scrolling human-computer interactions for intelligent interest inference on smartphones. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 1--22.
[47]
Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, N. Kando, Cheng Luo, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2018. Investigating Result Usefulness in Mobile Search. In European Conference on Information Retrieval.
[48]
Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Huanbo Luan, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, Hengliang Luo, and Yuntao Zhang. 2017. Understanding and Predicting Usefulness Judgment in Web Search. Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2017).
[49]
Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Ke Zhou, Jian-Yun Nie, Jingtao Song, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, Jiashen Sun, and Hengliang Luo. 2016. When does Relevance Mean Usefulness and User Satisfaction in Web Search? Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2016).
[50]
Gary Marchionini. 2006. Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Commun. ACM 49, 4 (2006), 41--46.
[51]
Catherine C. Marshall and Sara A. Bly. 2005. Saving and using encountered information: implications for electronic periodicals. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2005).
[52]
Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Arcas. 2017. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial intelligence and statistics. PMLR, 1273--1282.
[53]
Alan Medlar, Jing Li, and Dorota Głowacka. 2021. Query suggestions as summarization in exploratory search. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. 119--128.
[54]
Johannes Meyer, Adrian Frank, Thomas Schlebusch, and Enkeljeda Kasneci. 2021. A cnn-based human activity recognition system combining a laser feedback interferometry eye movement sensor and an imu for context-aware smart glasses. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 5, 4 (2021), 1--24.
[55]
Matthew Mitsui, Jiqun Liu, Nicholas J Belkin, and Chirag Shah. 2017. Predicting information seeking intentions from search behaviors. In Proceedings of the 40th international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval. 1121--1124.
[56]
Dan Morris, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Gina Venolia. 2008. SearchBar: a search-centric web history for task resumption and information re-finding. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2008).
[57]
Hongfeng Niu, Ang Wei, Yunpeng Song, and Zhongmin Cai. 2023. Exploring visual representations of computer mouse movements for bot detection using deep learning approaches. Expert Systems with Applications 229 (2023), 120225.
[58]
Srishti Palani, Zijian Ding, Austin Nguyen, Andrew Chuang, Stephen Macneil, and Steven W. Dow. 2021. CoNotate: Suggesting Queries Based on Notes Promotes Knowledge Discovery. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021).
[59]
Srishti Palani, Yingyi Zhou, Sheldon Zhu, and Steven W. Dow. 2022. InterWeave: Presenting Search Suggestions in Context Scaffolds Information Search and Synthesis. Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2022).
[60]
Bochen Pang, Chaozhuo Li, Yuming Liu, Jianxun Lian, Jianan Zhao, Hao Sun, Weiwei Deng, Xing Xie, and Qi Zhang. 2022. Improving relevance modeling via heterogeneous behavior graph learning in bing ads. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 3713--3721.
[61]
Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, et al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research 12 (2011), 2825--2830.
[62]
Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 1999. Information foraging. Psychological review 106, 4 (1999), 643.
[63]
Xiangyao Qi, Qi Lu, Wentao Pan, Yingying Zhao, Rui Zhu, Mingzhi Dong, Yuhu Chang, Qin Lv, Robert P Dick, Fan Yang, et al. 2023. CASES: A Cognition-Aware Smart Eyewear System for Understanding How People Read. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 7, 3 (2023), 1--31.
[64]
Napol Rachatasumrit, Gonzalo A. Ramos, Jina Suh, Rachel Ng, and Christopher Meek. 2021. ForSense: Accelerating Online Research Through Sensemaking Integration and Machine Research Support. 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2021).
[65]
Erik D Reichle, Keith Rayner, and Alexander Pollatsek. 2003. The EZ Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and brain sciences 26, 4 (2003), 445--476.
[66]
Nirmal Roy, Manuel Valle Torre, Ujwal Gadiraju, David Maxwell, and Claudia Hauff. 2021. Note the highlight: incorporating active reading tools in a search as learning environment. In Proceedings of the 2021 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. 229--238.
[67]
Monica M. C. Schraefel, Yuxiang Zhu, David Modjeska, Daniel J. Wigdor, and Shengdong Zhao. 2002. Hunter gatherer: interaction support for the creation and management of within-web-page collections. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web (2002).
[68]
Linjun Shou, Shining Bo, Feixiang Cheng, Ming Gong, Jian Pei, and Daxin Jiang. 2020. Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering. Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (2020).
[69]
Gino Slanzi, Jorge A Balazs, and Juan D Velásquez. 2017. Combining eye tracking, pupil dilation and EEG analysis for predicting web users click intention. Information Fusion 35 (2017), 51--57.
[70]
Mohammad Soleymani, Michael Riegler, and Pål Halvorsen. 2017. Multimodal analysis of image search intent: Intent recognition in image search from user behavior and visual content. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. 251--259.
[71]
Yunpeng Song and Zhongmin Cai. 2022. Integrating handcrafted features with deep representations for smartphone authentication. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 1 (2022), 1--27.
[72]
Jeffrey Stylos, Brad A Myers, and Andrew Faulring. 2004. Citrine: providing intelligent copy-and-paste. In Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 185--188.
[73]
Han Su, Shuncheng Liu, Bolong Zheng, Xiaofang Zhou, and Kai Zheng. 2020. A survey of trajectory distance measures and performance evaluation. The VLDB Journal 29 (2020), 3--32.
[74]
Simon Tretter, Gene Golovchinsky, and Pernilla Qvarfordt. 2013. SearchPanel: A Browser Extension for Managing Search Activity. In European Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval.
[75]
Pertti Vakkari, Michael Völske, Martin Potthast, Matthias Hagen, and Benno Stein. 2019. Modeling the usefulness of search results as measured by information use. Inf. Process. Manag. 56 (2019), 879--894.
[76]
Petar Veličković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio, and Yoshua Bengio. 2017. Graph attention networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10903 (2017).
[77]
Ellen M Voorhees. 2001. The philosophy of information retrieval evaluation. In Workshop of the cross-language evaluation forum for european languages. Springer, 355--370.
[78]
Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Hanwang Zhang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. Clicks can be cheating: Counterfactual recommendation for mitigating clickbait issue. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1288--1297.
[79]
Xiao Wang, Houye Ji, Chuan Shi, Bai Wang, Yanfang Ye, Peng Cui, and Philip S Yu. 2019. Heterogeneous graph attention network. In The world wide web conference. 2022--2032.
[80]
Austin R. Ward and Robert G. Capra. 2021. OrgBox: Supporting Cognitive and Metacognitive Activities During Exploratory Search. Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2021).
[81]
Qingsong Wen, Tian Zhou, Chaoli Zhang, Weiqi Chen, Ziqing Ma, Junchi Yan, and Liang Sun. 2022. Transformers in time series: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07125 (2022).
[82]
Ryen W. White and Resa A. Roth. 2009. Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services 1 (2009), 98.
[83]
Yingying Wu, Yiqun Liu, Yen-Hsi Richard Tsai, and Shing-Tung Yau. 2019. Investigating the role of eye movements and physiological signals in search satisfaction prediction using geometric analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70, 9 (2019), 981--999.
[84]
Zhijing Wu, Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2019. Investigating Passage-level Relevance and Its Role in Document-level Relevance Judgment. Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2019).
[85]
Zhijing Wu, Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2020. Investigating Reading Behavior in Fine-grained Relevance Judgment. Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2020).
[86]
Zhijing Wu, Jiaxin Mao, Kedi Xu, Dandan Song, and Heyan Huang. 2023. A Passage-Level Reading Behavior Model for Mobile Search. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023).
[87]
Xiaohui Xie, Jiaxin Mao, M. de Rijke, Ruizhe Zhang, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2018. Constructing an Interaction Behavior Model for Web Image Search. The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (2018).
[88]
Pingmei Xu, Yusuke Sugano, and Andreas Bulling. 2016. Spatio-temporal modeling and prediction of visual attention in graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3299--3310.
[89]
Yue Yu, Tong Xia, Huandong Wang, Jie Feng, and Yong Li. 2020. Semantic-aware spatio-temporal app usage representation via graph convolutional network. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 3 (2020), 1--24.
[90]
Zixuan Yuan, Hao Liu, Yanchi Liu, Denghui Zhang, Fei Yi, Nengjun Zhu, and Hui Xiong. 2020. Spatio-Temporal Dual Graph Attention Network for Query-POI Matching. Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2020).
[91]
Ruizhe Zhang, Xiaohui Xie, Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2021. Constructing a comparison-based click model for web search. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 270--283.
[92]
Yukun Zheng, Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Xiaohui Xie, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2020. Investigating Fine-Grained Usefulness Perception Process in Mobile Search. In China Conference on Information Retrieval.
[93]
Rongrong Zhu, Liang Shi, Yunpeng Song, and Zhongmin Cai. 2023. Integrating Gaze and Mouse Via Joint Cross-Attention Fusion Net for Students' Activity Recognition in E-learning. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 7 (2023), 1 - 35.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 8, Issue 4
December 2024
1788 pages
EISSN:2474-9567
DOI:10.1145/3705705
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 November 2024
Published in IMWUT Volume 8, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Interactive behavior modeling
  2. exploratory search
  3. eye and mouse movements
  4. graph attention network
  5. helpful web content identification

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 70
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)70
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media