skip to main content
10.1145/3704253acmconferencesBook PagePublication PagespepmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
PEPM '25: Proceedings of the 2025 ACM SIGPLAN International Workshop on Partial Evaluation and Program Manipulation
ACM2025 Proceeding
Publisher:
  • Association for Computing Machinery
  • New York
  • NY
  • United States
Conference:
PEPM '25: 2025 ACM SIGPLAN International Workshop on Partial Evaluation and Program Manipulation Denver CO USA 21 January 2025
ISBN:
979-8-4007-1350-7
Published:
10 January 2025
Sponsors:
In-Cooperation:
Recommend ACM DL
ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?SIGN IN

Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

We are pleased to present the proceedings of the 2025 ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Partial Evaluation and Program Manipulation (PEPM 2025), held in Denver, Colorado, January 21st, 2025, in affiliation with the annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL 2025). PEPM has a history going back to 1991, and originates in the discoveries of practically useful automated techniques for evaluating programs with only partial input. Over the years, the scope of PEPM has expanded to include a variety of research areas centered around the theme of semantics-based program manipulation --- the systematic exploitation of treating programs not only as subject to black-box execution, but also as data structures that can be generated, analyzed, and transformed while establishing or maintaining important semantic properties.

Skip Table Of Content Section
SESSION: Invited Contributions
invited-talk
The Ethical Compiler: Addressing the Is-Ought Gap in Compilation (Invited Talk)

The is-ought gap is a problem in moral philosophy observing that ethical judgments ("ought") cannot be grounded purely in truth judgments ("is"): that an ought cannot be derived from an is. This gap renders the following argument invalid: "It is true ...

invited-talk
A Type-Theoretic Framework for Certified Meta-programming (Invited Talk Extended Abstract)

Meta-programming is the art of writing programs that produce or manipulate other programs. This allows programmers to automate error-prone or repetitive tasks, and exploit domain-specific knowledge to customize the generated code. Unfortunately, writing ...

invited-talk
The Missing Diagonal: High Level Languages for Low Level Systems (Invited Talk Abstract)

The computing community has produced many high level languages and tools for programming high level systems (e.g. Java for user interfaces) and it has produced many low level languages and tools for programming low level systems (C for operating systems, ...

SESSION: Papers
research-article
Algebraic Stepper for Simple Modules

An algebraic stepper is a pedagogical tool for showing the intermediate steps of program execution. This paper presents an algebraic stepper for OCaml that supports simple modules with hierarchical reference to variables (but without functors or ...

research-article
Open Access
A Type Safe Calculus for Generating Syntax-Directed Editors

Editor calculi make it possible to describe the actions of syntax-directed editing and provide guarantees of safety through their specialized type system: Well-typed editor scripts produce well-formed programs. So far, such calculi have been language-...

research-article
Open Access
Characterizations of Partial Well-Behaved Lenses

Foster et al. proposed a linguistic approach to the bidirectional transformation, with lens. A lens is a pair of two functions, one is a forward transformation called get which produces a target view from an original source, and the other is a backward ...

Typed Program Analysis without Encodings

Programs are viewed as both functions to be executed and data structures to be analysed, but this has always required encoding, e.g. of a lambda-term to a syntax tree, so that a self-interpreter could not be applied to itself directly, but only to its ...

Contributors
  • University of Strathclyde

Index Terms

  1. Proceedings of the 2025 ACM SIGPLAN International Workshop on Partial Evaluation and Program Manipulation

    Recommendations

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 66 of 120 submissions, 55%
    YearSubmittedAcceptedRate
    PEPM '15271452%
    PEPM '14221777%
    PEPM '13291345%
    PEPM '02221150%
    PEPM '00201155%
    Overall1206655%