In this section, we describe the results of our thematic analysis and interview data and answer the aforementioned research questions based on these results.
4.1 RQ1: General Adoption and Benefits of Using Mobile Financial Services
Our interview data shows that low-income migrant workers move to cities like Dhaka mainly for better financial opportunities. However, due to limited knowledge of traditional financial institutions, they often rely on third-party cash transactions to send money home, sometimes involving someone physically delivering the cash and taking a fee. These complex methods increase the risk of theft, fraud, or loss during transfers. Our findings highlight the impact of MFS adoption, with 37 out of 40 participants having accounts with at least one local provider. Users switching to MFS associate mobile money with quick access to their funds. However, marginalized groups may struggle to fully understand the benefits of mobile money services and often continue relying on familiar methods or depend on others to manage their accounts.
4.1.1 MFS Adoption Mediums.
The usefulness of MFS depends on factors such as the service’s availability, reliability, and security, as well as the range and quality of the features and functions offered. We found that 26 out of 37 participants who use MFS services use their smartphones to access the services. Our collected data also reflects the growing adoption of smartphones in the lower-class worker demographic.
Figure
2 shows that almost 70% of our study population use smartphones as their primary mobile devices. However, feature phone or non-smartphone use also tends to be higher in older age groups. Feature phone users are only subjected to the use of USSD for their daily mobile money transactions. Some participants stated that using smartphones at this age is too tricky, and they are content using their feature phones. Consequently, they are only introduced to key MFS services like sending money, mobile balance top-up, and payment.
However, advanced services like savings, loans, insurance, and other payment shopping benefits can not be easily accessible through USSD requests. The development of these services prioritizes digital adoption through a robust mobile app. In such cases, migrant workers may depend on others, such as intermediaries, agents, or peers, to help them use their accounts. This reliance is subject to factors such as lack of access to mobile devices, network coverage, electricity, or lack of confidence to operate the technology. This affects the service cost, convenience, and security, as well as the privacy and autonomy of the users. While analyzing the answers of the participants who shared their stories about adopting mobile money services, our research illuminates the theory that MFS adoption happens in stages and that various external factors directly or indirectly affect the general adoption of users.
4.1.2 Challenges of MFS Adoption.
Our analysis highlighted the importance of service reliability, especially for institutions and banks associated with MFS providers, in building trust. Users familiar with traditional financial services and those who only dealt with hard cash had varied experiences. Migrant workers, seeking better opportunities, face difficulties managing their income. They want a secure way to send money to their families, ensuring their efforts are recognized and their loved ones cared for. A fast, cost-effective system with minimal risks of loss or delay is crucial for their peace of mind.
With the rise of digital services, financial inclusivity has become vital, especially for migrant workers. Despite the advantages of MFS, like lower costs and faster transactions, adoption among these workers remains a challenge. Many hesitate due to trust issues, lack of awareness, or unfamiliarity with the technology. Barriers such as language, literacy, and regulatory procedures further complicate adoption. We interviewed one participant who firmly believed in cash money and did not want any more chances with mobile money with his hard-earned cash as he had already faced difficulties in recovering his bKash account after misplacing his mobile phone.
4.1.3 Services and Benefits.
In our interviews, 33 respondents reported using bKash, while 3 exclusively used Nagad. Additionally, 17 participants used both services. This can be compared with the overall market share of these local MFS providers shown in figure
1. These findings highlight the strong market presence of these two companies, reinforcing their dominance in Bangladesh’s growing Mobile Financial Service sector. The benefits of mobile money services go beyond convenience, offering greater financial access, security, and faster transactions. This has now become standard practice, introducing users to safer money transfer methods and easier access to their funds. Service providers have opened up new possibilities for users to manage their money instantly.
One female participant shared how MFS significantly transformed her life for the better. A widowed mother with two daughters who live with their grandmother in the countryside. She has been working as a domestic helper in Dhaka for 12 years. She explained how her illiterate mother’s lack of knowledge led their family to fall victim to financial scams in the past. However, when she was introduced to MFS through a local agent, it gave her relief and security, ensuring her money safely reached her family. Now, with her daughters learning to handle basic MFS functions, they can get hold of her money when needed, without involving help from anyone else. In the past, traditional banking processes required basic literacy, which she and her mother lacked, forcing them to rely on brokers. With MFS, she feels more in control of her family’s expenses, giving her a sense of independence and confidence.
Additionally, during our conversation with one male participant, who moved to the city at 16 years old to start working as a cook. He expressed how mobile money services have seamlessly transformed his life, subduing the stress associated with traditional banking methods and unauthorized transactions. Being reasonably educated, he found using MFS services with his smartphone quite convenient compared to the weekly routine of going to the bank and waiting in line. He also described the relief he felt when the service agent only needed his national identity (NID) card and mobile number for the initial registration process.
Benefits such as a lower barrier of entry, a lower learning curve for the low-literate marginalized population, and the ease of access to basic financial services through mobile devices are not just conveniences. They are tools of empowerment, giving these individuals more control over their money and how it is used.
4.2 RQ2: Observing Factors of Influence Across Different Age and Profession Demographic, Presence of Socioeconomic Inequalities
Our study findings reveal that our participants face various technological and socioeconomic challenges. However, we also identified key factors driving the growing use of Mobile Financial Services (MFS) among the study population. Demographic features such as education, age, profession, and current living standards significantly influence the adoption and use of these technologies.
During the interviews, we observed that individuals over 40 often avoid using smartphones in their daily lives. Many feel they lack the capability to manage their own MFS accounts. Figure
3 shows the age distribution of our study, with participants from various age groups. Interestingly, some respondents mentioned they had smartphones but relied on more tech-savvy family members for MFS tasks. Some had negative past experiences with MFS, finding it too complicated. This suggests that the fear of financial mistakes outweighs the potential convenience. While smartphone usage rates were similar across age groups, older individuals are more protective of their money and less likely to use MFS for personal finances.
Our open-ended interview questions revealed that education plays a crucial role in adapting to new technologies. Those with higher education levels are more likely to adopt technology. All participants with at least a high school education used smartphones, all of whom used MFS services. Their education and ability to understand instruction languages gave them the confidence to access these financial services. In contrast, the uneducated working class showed little interest in exploring MFS options, struggling to engage with either traditional or modern financial systems.
People’s professions and living situations also have an impact on how people face obstacles in utilizing services. Table
3 shows us the participant’s occupation and gender index encompassing 6 different professions. People who are dependent on MFS transactions for their daily earnings, like freelance drivers, have a lot more time to interact and slowly get used to the features that mobile money services provide to their full potential. Meanwhile, domestic helpers may only stick to the basic functionalities they learn. Most people who work on-site or in-house jobs, such as domestic help, building caretakers, and attendants, only regard MFS services as a medium for sending and receiving money with their relatives. They are concerned about the convenience of the process but lack the encouragement to dive a little deeper into what other services are available.
Additionally, the participants’ background data revealed that users’ family dynamics also play a pivotal role in MFS utilization in daily life. In several instances, direct kinship relationships exerted a significant influence on the decision-making process about technology adoption. Notably, older participants frequently engaged in discussions regarding their financial transactions, seeking validation and confirmation from their inner circles, which were comprised of close friends and family members. This tendency underscores the social dimensions that intertwine with technological assimilation among the older demographic.
4.2.1 User Pattern and Cash Flow Demographic.
The amount of financial transactions also emerges as a important determinant in the stratification of specific demographic cohorts, such as younger working adults (ages 18 -30) who tend to send portions of their monthly income back through mobile money services once or twice a month. Most of these individuals have begun working in Dhaka within the last decade.
Two participants, who were security guards by profession, proclaimed that they came to Dhaka to ease their families’ burdens. One’s father fell ill, and another was burdened by heavy agricultural loans. Losses in multiple seasonal harvests forced his father to send him to Dhaka in search of work. The majority of the middle-aged working demographic in our study population maintain their own families back home. They are the family’s breadwinners. Hence, they sometimes need to use the MFS send money function multiple times weekly.
Our interviewees stated that digital money services especially come in handy with utility bill payments. Even rural utility service providers have now embraced the usage of mobile money transactions. Some MFS providers have made it easier by directly partnering with these services to attract more users to their platforms. These changes also influence long-standing social norms.
4.2.2 18-30 Years Old.
Our study focused on young adults aged 18 to 30, who moved from rural areas to Dhaka in the last 5 to 10 years to improve their families’ living standards. This group is technologically adept and relies heavily on smartphones to access MFS services, using apps to track transactions. Some participants reported using MFS more than 20 times a month, not only for remittances but also for other functionalities.
We interviewed 9 participants, mostly male freelance motorcycle drivers, who earned through digital payments. Many had no ties to formal banking, with their wages accumulating only in MFS accounts, underscoring the service’s reliability. Interestingly, their monthly transaction amounts did not differ much from older workers, but the usage patterns, cash flow, and goals for the funds varied.
4.2.3 31-50 Years Old.
This group is more established in Dhaka, having worked there longer and gained better control over their income. Many said they support their own families and often think about how to use their earnings from Dhaka more efficiently. Most can operate MFS on their own, though some still need help from peers or telecom shops. Many use both feature phones and smartphones for daily tasks.
Although the total transaction amounts don’t vary much across jobs, changes in cash flow patterns are noticeable. For example, one male barber makes small transactions several times a day. Whereas one male security guard sends larger sums less frequently. Both send less than 15,000 taka home each month. They also use MFS for utility payments to meet family needs. Our interviews show that these workers focus on maintaining stability for their families, using the money for things like education, food, and farming. This highlights their influence over household decisions, with family members aware that their loved ones are working hard in the city to improve their living standards.
4.2.4 50+ Years Old:
People in this category mostly moved to Dhaka city over 20 years ago. According to our observations, this subset of people is more likely to avoid using the complexity of smartphones. While a portion of them may use smartphones, most of the study population prefers to use non-smartphones. Most of them have been the only breadwinner for their family for many decades. Most of their kin have moved out of the family homes. Some now live in the city with their children. However, it is predominantly clear that this working-class demographic is the most vulnerable to financial scams. Due to their lower technical literacy, most participants fully depended on external assistance to manage their MFS needs. The local telecom shops have an important role in assisting this older group of people. The cash flow from the income generated is now used for development needs. The participants we observed conveyed their wish to build or repair their house back home, buy cattle, buy medication, and invest in agricultural production.
4.2.5 Male Dominance and Urban Migration.
While Dhaka city is characterized by the significant presence of male migrant workers, it is essential to acknowledge the diverse demographics within the urban landscape, including women, who contribute to the city’s workforce and societal fabric. Traditionally, female migrant workers are thought to be seen only in the sphere of the domestic help workforce. Table
3 also exhibits that out of the 7 domestic help workers we interviewed, 6 are female. The male participant reportedly earns a higher salary than others, reinforcing gender stereotypes.
Differences in income in different fields of work create potential variations in mobile financial services (MFS) usage between male and female migrant workers, revealing the complex changes in the growing world of labor migration. Female migrant workers, often employed in domestic roles, may use MFS for remittances and managing their finances. This group has specific financial needs that MFS can address. Where ease of usability is identified as their primary concern while engaging with financial services in any form, understanding these gender-specific patterns is crucial for tailoring financial services to address the diverse needs of both male and female migrants, enabling coherence in mobile money services. MFS can be a crucial tool for financial inclusion, providing services to individuals who might not have had access to formal banking in their rural hometowns.
4.2.6 Observed Inequalities and Challenges.
The study delves into the socioeconomic implications of MFS adoption, emphasizing the impact on family dynamics, social norms, and financial independence among migrant workers. It recognizes the role of family networks in influencing technology adoption decisions, particularly among older demographics. The age-specific analysis provides valuable insights into the varying needs and preferences of different age groups. In our small-scale study, 20% of our interviews were with women. 75% of these female participants are in the sphere of domestic help workforce.
While digital payments can contribute to a country’s development, the experiences of individuals vary widely. People from lower economic backgrounds often face more challenges. One participant shared an experience of not being able to cash out a small amount due to an uncooperative MFS agent, which may stem from agents prioritizing profit. Women, especially working-class women, face additional challenges, like needing to visit agent shops multiple times a month, often in difficult social settings.