skip to main content
10.1145/375735.376301acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

ATTac-2000: an adaptive autonomous bidding agent

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 May 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

The First Trading Agent Competition (TAC) was held from June 22 to July 8, 2000. TAC was designed to create a benchmark problem in the complex domain of e-marketplaces and to motivate researchers to apply unique approaches to a common task. This paper describes \attac, the first-place finisher in TAC. \attac\ uses a principled bidding strategy that includes several elements of {adaptivity\/}. In addition to the success at the competition, isolated empirical results are presented indicating the robustness and effectiveness of \attac's adaptive strategy.

References

  1. 1.P. C.Cramton. The FCC spectrum auctions: An early assessment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 6(3):431-495, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.J. A. Csirik, M. L. Littman, S. Singh, and P. Stone. FAucS: An FCC spectrum auction simulator for autonomous bidding agents. Under Review, 2001. Available at http: //www.research.att.com/~pstone/papers.html.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3.A. Eisenberg. In online auctions of the future, it'll be bot vs. bot vs. bot. The New York Times, 2000. August 17th.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.A. Greenwald and P. Stone. Autonomous bidding agents in the trading agent competition. IEEE Computing, 2001. To appear. Available at http: //www.research.att.com/~pstone/papers.html. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.M. L. Littman. Markov games as a framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 157-163, San Mateo, CA, 1994. Morgan Kaufman.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.S. Singh, M. Kearns, and Y. Mansour. Nash convergence of gradient dynamics in general sum games. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), pages 541-548, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.P. Stone. Layered Learning in Multiagent Systems: A Winning Approach to Robotic Soccer. MIT Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.R. J. Weber. Making more from less: Strategic demand reduction in the FCC spectrum auctions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 6(3):529-548, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10.M. P. Wellman, P. R. Wurman, K. O'Malley, R. Bangera, S.-d. Lin, D. Reeves, and W. E. Walsh. A trading agent competition. In press. Available at http://tac.eecs.umich.edu/reports.html, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. ATTac-2000: an adaptive autonomous bidding agent

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          AGENTS '01: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents
          May 2001
          662 pages
          ISBN:158113326X
          DOI:10.1145/375735

          Copyright © 2001 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 May 2001

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          AGENTS '01 Paper Acceptance Rate66of248submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate182of599submissions,30%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader