skip to main content
10.1145/378239.378338acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Layout design methodolgies for sub-wavelength manufacturing

Published:22 June 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe new types of layout design constraints needed to effectively leverage advanced optical wafter lithography techniques. Most of these constraints are dictated by the physics of advanced lithography processes, while other constraints are imposed by new photomask techniques. Among the methods discussed are 1) phase shift mask (PSM) lithography in which phase information is placed to the photomask in combination with conventional clear and dar information; 2) optical proximity correction (OPC) where predictable distorations in feature geometry are corrected by putting an inverse distortion on the mask; 3) off-axis illumination optics that improve resolution of some configurations at the expense of others; and 4) use of non-resolving assist features that improve neighboring structures.

References

  1. 1.Yen, A., Tritchkov, A., Stirniman, J.P., Vandenberghe, G., Jonckheere, R., Ronse, K., Van den hove, L., Characterization and correction of optical proximity effects.., J. Vac. Sci Technol. B 14(6), Nov/Dec 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.Park, C.H., Kim, Y.H., Lee, H.J., Kong, J.T., Lee, S.H., A practical approach to control full chip level gate CD in DUV lithography, SPIE vol. 3334 (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Semiconductor Industry Association, International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors: 1999 edition, Austin, TX: International SEMATECH, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Wagner, C., Kaiser, W., Mulkens, J., Flagello D., Advanced Technology for Extending Optical Lithography, SPIE Microlithography, vol. 4000, (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Levenson, M.D., Viswanathan, N.S., Simpson, R.A., Improving resolution in photolithography with a phase-shifting mask, IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, 29(11):1828-1836, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6.A. B. Kahng, S. Vaya and A. Zelikovsky, "New Graph Bipartizations for Double-Exposure, Bright Field Alternating Phase-Shift Mask Layout", Proc. Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conf., Jan. 2001, pp. 133-138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Liu, H.Y., Karklin, L., Wang, Y.T., Pati, Y.C., The application of alternating phase-shifting masks.., SPIE vol 3236, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Suzuki, A., Saitoh, K., Yoshii, M., Multilevel imaging system realizing k1=0.3 lithography, SPIE vol. 3679 (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Fritze, M., Tyrrell, D., Astolfi, D., Yost, D., Davis, P., Wheeler, B., Mallen, R., Jarmolowicz, J., Cann, S., 100-nm Node Lithography with KrF?, SPIE Microlithography (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Levenson, M.D., Peterson, J.S., Gerold, D.G., Mack, C.A., Pahse Phirst An improved strong-PSM paradigm, SPIE Microlithography (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Levenson, M.D., Phase shifting mask strategies: isolated dark lines, Microlithography World !, 6-12 (March/April 1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Kim, S.M., Kim, S.J., Bang, C.J., Ham, Y.M., Baik, K.H., Optimization of Dipole Off-Axis Illumination.., Japan J. Appl. Physics, vol 39 Part 1, No. 12B (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Rieger, M., Stirniman, J., TCAD physical verification for reticle enhancement techniques, Solid State Technology, Vol. 43, No. 7, July 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Layout design methodolgies for sub-wavelength manufacturing

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              DAC '01: Proceedings of the 38th annual Design Automation Conference
              June 2001
              863 pages
              ISBN:1581132972
              DOI:10.1145/378239

              Copyright © 2001 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 22 June 2001

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

              Upcoming Conference

              DAC '24
              61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
              June 23 - 27, 2024
              San Francisco , CA , USA

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader