skip to main content
10.1145/379437.379470acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Public use of digital community information sstems: findings from a recent study with implications for system design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 January 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Internet has considerably empowered libraries and changed common p erception of what they entail. Public libraries, in particular, are using technological advancements to expand their range of services and enhance their civic roles. Providing community information (CI) in innovative, digital forms via community networks is one way in which public libraries are facilitating everyday information needs. These networks have been lauded for their potential to strengthen physical communities through increasing information flow about local services and events, and through facilitating civic interaction. However, little is known about how the public uses such digital services and what barriers they encounter. This paper presents findings about how digital CI systems benefit physical communities based on extensive case studies in three states. At each site, rich data were collected using online surveys, field observation, in-depth interviews and focus groups with Internet users, human service providers and library staff. Both the online survey and the follow-up interviews with respondents were based on sense-making theory. In our paper we discuss our findings regarding: (1) how the public is using digital CI systems for daily problem solving, and (2) the types of barriers they encounter. Suggestions for improving digital CI systems are provided.

References

  1. 1.Baker, L. M., and Pettigrew, K. E. Theories for practitioners: Two frameworks for studying consumer health informationseeking behavior. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 87, 4 (1999), 444-50.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Baker, S. L., and Ruey, E. D. Information and referral services - attitudes and barriers: A survey of North Carolina public libraries. Reference Quarterly, 28, 3 (1988), 243-52.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Bates, M. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review. 13, 5 (1989), 407-424.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4.Bishop, A. P., Tidline, T., Shoemaker, S., and Salela, P. Public libraries and networked information services in low-income communities. Libraries and Information Science Research, 21, 3 (1999), 361-90.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Chatman, E. A. Framing social life in theory and research. In L. H~glund (Ed.), ISIC 2000: The Third International Conference on Information Seeking in Context. Gothenburg, Sweden, 16- 18 August 2000. London, England: Taylor Graham.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Chatman, E. A. The impoverished life-world of outsiders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, (1996), 193-206.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. 7.Chen, C., and Hernon, P. Information Seeking: Assessing and Anticipating User Needs. Neal-Schuman, New York, 1982.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Childers, T. Information and Referral: Public Libraries. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1984.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Cisler, S. Weatherproofing a great, good place. American Libraries, 27, 9 (1996), 42-46.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Dervin, B. From the mind's eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J. D. Glazier and R. R. Powell (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Information Management (pp. 61-84). Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO, 1992.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Dervin, B., et al. The development of strategies for dealing with the information needs of urban residents: Phase I: The citizen study. Final report of Project L0035J to the U.S. Office of Education. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, School of Communications. ERIC: ED 125640, 1976.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Durrance, J. C. Meeting Community Needs through Job and Career Centers. Neal-Schuman, New York, 1994.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Durrance, J. C. Armed for Action: Library Response to Citizen Information Needs. Neal-Schuman, New York, 1984a.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Durrance, J. C. Community information services - An innovation at the beginning of its second decade. Advances in Librarianship 13, (1984b) 99-128.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Durrance, J. C., et al. Serving Job Seekers and Career Changers: A Planning Manual for Public Libraries. American Library Association, Chicago, IL, 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Durrance, J. C., and Pettigrew, K. E. Community information: The technological touch. Library Journal, 125, 2 (2000), 44-46.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Durrance, J. C., and Schneider, K. G. Public library community information activities: Precursors of community networking partnerships. Ann Arbor, MI: School of Information, University of Michigan. 1996: http://www.si.umich.edu/Community/taospaper.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Erdelez, S., and Rioux, K. Sharing information encountered for others on the web. In L. H~glund (Ed.), ISIC 2000: The Third International Conference on Information Seeking in Context. Gothenburg, Sweden, 16-18 August 2000. London, England: Taylor Graham.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Geffert, B. Community networks in libraries: A case study of the Freenet P.A.T.H. Public Libraries, 32, (1993), 91-99.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Gross, M. Imposed information seeking in school library media centers and public libraries: A common behavior? In H~glund, L., (Ed.), ISIC 2000: The Third International Conference on Information Seeking in Context. Gothenburg, Sweden, 16-18 August 2000. London, England: Taylor Graham.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Gurstein, M. Community Information: Enabling Communities with Information and Communications Technologies. Idea Group Publishing, London, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.Hampton, K., and Wellman, B. Examining community in the digital neighbourhood: Early results from Canada's wired suburb. In T. Ishida and K. Isbister (Eds.), Digital Cities: Technologies, Experiences, and Future Perspectives (pp. 475-492). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.Harris, R. M., and Dewdney, P. Barriers to Information: How Formal Help Systems Fail Battered Women. Greenwood Press, Westport, CN, 1994.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Harsh, S. An analysis of Boulder Community Network usage. 1995: http://bcn.boulder.co.us/community/resources/harsh/harshproje ct.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Harvey, K., and Horne, T. Surfing in Seattle: What cyberpatrons want. American Libraries, 26, (1995), 1028-1030.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.Head, A. J. Design Wise: A Guide for Evaluating the Interface Design of Information Resources. CyberAge Books, Medford, NJ, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27.Kraut, R., Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., and Scherlis, W. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 9 (1999), 1017-1031.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.Nie, N. H., and Erbring, L. Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, Stanford, CA, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.Patrick, A. S. Media lessons from the National Capital FreeNet. Communications of the ACM, 40, 7 (1997), 74-80.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. 30.Patrick, A. Services on the information highway: Subjective measures of use and importance from the National Capital FreeNet. 1996: http://debra.dgbt.doc.ca/services-research/survey/services/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.Patrick, A. S., and Black, A. Implications of access methods and frequency of use for the National Capital Freenet. 1996a: http://debra.dgbt.doc.ca/services-research/survey/connections/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.Patrick, A. S., and Black, A. Losing sleep and watching less TV but socializing more: Personal and social impacts of using the NCF. 1996b: http://debra.dgbt.doc.ca/services-research.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.Patrick, A. S., Black, A., and Whalen, T. E. Rich, young, male, dissatisfied computer geeks? Demographics and satisfaction with the NCF. In D. Godfrey and M. Levy (Eds.), Proceedings of Telecommunities 95: The international community networking conference (pp. 83-107). Victoria, British Columbia: Telecommunities Canada, 1995. http://debra.dgbt.doc.ca/services-research/survey/demographic s/vic.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.Pettigrew, K. E. Lay information provision in community settings: How community health nurses disseminate human services information to the elderly. The Library Quarterly, 70, 1 (2000), 47-85.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.Pettigrew, K.E. Nurses' perceptions of their needs for community information: Results of an exploratory study in southwestern Ontario. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 37, (1996), 351-60.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. 36.Pettigrew, K. E., and Durrance, J. C. Community building using the 'Net: Perceptions of organizers, information providers and Internet users. Internet Research 1.0: The State of the Interdiscipline, First Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, September 14-17, 2000. {url: www.cddc.vt.edu/aoir/}]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.Pettigrew, K. E., Durrance, J. C., and Vakkari, P. Approaches to studying public library Internet initiatives: A review of the literature and overview of a current study. Library and Information Science Research, 21, 3 (1999), 327-60.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. 38.Putnam, R. D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.Putnam, R. D. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6 (1995), 65-78.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. 40.Raskin, J. The Humane Interface: New Directions for Designing Interactive Systems. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. 41.Sales, G. A Taxonomy of Human Services: A Conceptual Framework with Standardized Terminology and Definitions for the Field. Alliance of Information and Referral System and INFO LINE of Los Angeles, 1994.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.Savolainen, R. Use studies of electronic networks: A review of the literature of empirical research approaches and challenges for their development. Journal of Documentation, 54 (1998), 332-351.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. 43.Savolainen, R. The sense-making theory: Reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 29 (1993), 13-28.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. 44.Schalken, K., and Tops, P. The digital city: A study into the backgrounds and opinions of its residents. Paper presented at the Canadian Community Networks Conference, August 15- 17, 1994. Carleton University, Ottawa. http://cwis.kub.nl/~frw/people/schalken/schalken.htm.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.Schuler, D. New Community Networks: Wired for Change. Addison-Wesley, New York, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. 46.Schuler, D. Community networks: Building a new participatory medium. Communications of the ACM, 37 (1994), 39-51.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. 47.Wellman, B. Physical place and CyberPlace: The rise of networked individualism. Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25 (in press).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.Witte, J.C., Amoroso, L.M., and Pen, H. Research methodology - Method and representation in Internet-based survey tools - Mobility, community, and cultural identity in Survey 2000. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 2 (2000), 179-195.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. 49.Zhang, Y. Using the Internet for survey research: A case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1 (2000), 57-68.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. 50.Zweizig, D., and Dervin, B. Public library use, users, uses: Advances in knowledge of the characteristics and needs of the adult clientele of American public libraries. Advances in Librarianship, 7 (1977), 231-55.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Public use of digital community information sstems: findings from a recent study with implications for system design

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          JCDL '01: Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
          January 2001
          481 pages
          ISBN:1581133456
          DOI:10.1145/379437

          Copyright © 2001 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 January 2001

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          JCDL '01 Paper Acceptance Rate76of250submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader