skip to main content
10.1145/381591.381638acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A self-adaptive scheduling algorithm of on-demand broadcasts

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 July 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

In mobile wireless systems data on air can be accessed by a large number of mobile users. Many of these applications such as wireless internets and traffic information systems are pull-based, that is, they respond to on-demand user requests. In this paper, we study the scheduling problems of on-demand broadcast environments. Traditionally, the response time of the requests has been used as a performance measure. In this paper we consider the performance as the average cost of request composed of three kinds of costs—access time cost, tuning time cost, and cost of handling failure request. Our main contribution is a self-adaptive scheduling algorithm named LDFC, which computes the delay cost of data item as the priority for broadcast. It performs well compared with some previous algorithms in this context.

References

  1. 1.Acharya, S., Alonso, R., Franklin, M. and Zdonik, S. Broadcast Disks: Data management for asymmetric commu- nications environments. In Michael J. Carey and Donovan A. Schneider, editors, Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, San Jose, California, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Acharya, S., Franklin, M. and Zdonik, S. Disseminating updates on broadcast disks. In: Proc 22nd VLDB Conf, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Acharya, S., Franklin, M. and Zdonik, S. Dissemination-based data delivery using Broadcast Disks. IEEE Personal Communications, 1995,2(6): 50- 60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4.Acharya, S. and Muthukrishnan, S. Scheduling ondemand broadcasts: new metrics and algorithms. Proceeding of ACM/IEEE MobiCom, Dallas, TX, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Aksoy, D. and Franklin, M. Scheduling for large scale on-demand data broadcast. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, San Francisco, CA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6.Bender, M., Chakrabarti, S. and Muthukrishnan, S. Flow and stretch metrics for scheduling continuous job streams. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual ACM - SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, San Francisco, California, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Chiueh, T. Scheduling for broadcast-based file systems. In: Proc MOBIDATA Workshop, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Datta, A., Vandermeer, D. E., Celik, A. and Kumar, B.V. Broadcast protocols to support efficient retrieval from database by mobile users. ACM TODS, 1999, 24(1) 1-79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Gondhalekar, V. A. Scheduling periodic wireless data broadcast. MS Thesis, the University of Texas at Austin, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Imielinski, T. and Badrinath, B. R. Mobile wireless computing: solutions and challenges in data management. Communications of the ACM, 1994, 37(10). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Imielinski, T., Viswanathan, S. and Badrinath, B. R. Energy efficient indexing on air. In: Proc ACM SIGMOD 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Shivakumar, N. and Venka, S. Efficient indexing for broadcast-based wireless systems. ACM Mobile Networks and Nomadic Applications, 1996, 1(4): 433- 446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Su, C. and Tassiulas, L. Broadcast scheduling for information distribution. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Los Alamitos, CA USA, April 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Viswanathan, S. and Imielinski, T. Pyramid broadcasting for Video on Demand service. Technical Report DCS TR-311, Rutgers University, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Wong, J. W. Broadcast delivery. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1988, 76(t2): 1566-1577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A self-adaptive scheduling algorithm of on-demand broadcasts

                    Recommendations

                    Comments

                    Login options

                    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                    Sign in
                    • Published in

                      cover image ACM Conferences
                      MSWIM '01: Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
                      July 2001
                      147 pages
                      ISBN:1581133782
                      DOI:10.1145/381591

                      Copyright © 2001 ACM

                      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                      Publisher

                      Association for Computing Machinery

                      New York, NY, United States

                      Publication History

                      • Published: 21 July 2001

                      Permissions

                      Request permissions about this article.

                      Request Permissions

                      Check for updates

                      Qualifiers

                      • Article

                      Acceptance Rates

                      MSWIM '01 Paper Acceptance Rate16of55submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

                    PDF Format

                    View or Download as a PDF file.

                    PDF

                    eReader

                    View online with eReader.

                    eReader