skip to main content
article

Computing curricula 2001

Published:01 September 2001Publication History
First page image

References

  1. ABET2000 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Accreditation policy and procedure manual. Baltimore, MD: ABET, Inc., November 2000. http://www.abet.org/images/policies.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ACM65 ACM Curriculum Committee on Computer Science. An undergraduate program in computer science-preliminary recommendations. Communications of the ACM, 8(9):543-552, September 1965. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. ACM68 ACM Curriculum Committee on Computer Science. Curriculum '68: Recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 11(3):151-197, March 1968. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. ACM78 ACM Curriculum Committee on Computer Science. Curriculum '78: Recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 22(3):147-166, March 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. ACM99 ACM Two-Year College Education Committee. Guidelines for associatedegree and certificate programs to support computing in a networked environment. New York: The Association for Computing Machinery, September 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ACM2001 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM code of ethics and professional conduct. New York: The Association for Computing Machinery, May 2001. http://www.acm.org/constitution/code.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. AP2000 Advanced Placement Program. Introduction of Java in 2003-2004. The College Board, December 20, 2000. http://www.collegeboard.org/ap/ computer-science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. BCS89a British Computer Society and The Institution of Electrical Engineers. Undergraduate curricula for software engineers. London, June 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. BCS89b British Computer Society and The Institution of Electrical Engineers. Software in safety-related systems. London, October 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Beidler85 John Beidler, Richard Austing, and Lillian Cassel. Computing programs in small colleges. Communications of the ACM, 28(6):605-611, June 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bennett86 W. Bennett. A position paper on guidelines for electrical and computer engineering education. IEEE Transactions in Education, E-29(3):175-177, August 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bott91 Frank Bott, Allison Coleman, Jack Eaton, and Diane Rowland. Professional issues in software engineering. London: Pitman, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Carnegie92 Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government. Enabling the future: Linking science and technology to societal goals. New York: Carnegie Commission, September 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. COSINE67 COSINE Committee. Computer science in electrical engineering. Washington, DC: Commission on Engineering Education, September 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. CSAB86 Computing Sciences Accreditation Board. Defining the computing sciences professions. October 1986. http://www.csab.org/comp_sci_profession.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. CSAB2000 Computing Sciences Accreditation Board. Criteria for accrediting programs in computer science in the United States. Version 1.0, January 2000. http://www.csab.org/criteria2k_v10.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. CSTB94 Computing Science and Telecommunications Board. Realizing the information future. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. CSTB99 Computing Science and Telecommunications Board. Being fluent with information technology. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Curtis83 Kent K. Curtis. Computer manpower: Is there a crisis? Washington DC: National Science Foundation, 1983. http://www.acm.org/sigcse/papers/ curtis83/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis97 Gordon B. Davis, John T. Gorgone, J. Daniel Couger, David L. Feinstein, and Herbert E. Longnecker, Jr. IS'97 model curriculum and guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in information systems. Association of Information Technology Professionals, 1997. http://webfoot.csom.umn.edu/faculty/ gdavis/curcomre.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Denning89 Peter J. Denning, Douglas E. Comer, David Gries, Michael C. Mulder, Allen B. Tucker, A. Joe Turner, and Paul R. Young. Computing as a discipline. Communications of the ACM, 32(1):9-23, January 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Denning98 Peter J. Denning. Computing the profession. Educom Review, November 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Denning99 Peter J. Denning. Our seed corn is growing in the commons. Information Impacts Magazine, March 1999. http://www.cisp.org/imp/march_99/denning/ 03_99denning.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. EAB83 Educational Activities Board. The 1983 model program in computer science and engineering. Technical Report 932, Computer Society of the IEEE, December 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. EAB86 Educational Activities Board. Design education in computer science and engineering. Technical Report 971, Computer Society of the IEEE, October 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. EC77 Education Committee of the IEEE Computer Society. A curriculum in computer science and engineering. Publication EHO119-8, Computer Society of the IEEE, January 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibbs86 Norman E. Gibbs and Allen B. Tucker. Model curriculum for a liberal arts degree in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 29(3):202-210, March 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Gorgone2000 John T. Gorgone, Paul Gray, David L. Feinstein, George M. Kasper, Jerry N. Luftman, Edward A. Stohr, Joseph S. Valacich, and Rolf T. Wigand. MSIS 2000: Model curriculum and guidelines for graduate degree programs in information systems. Association for Computing Machinery and Association for Information Systems, January 2000. http://cis.bentley.edu/ISA/pages/ documents/msis2000jan00.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. IEEE2001 Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers. IEEE code of ethics. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, May 2001. http://www.ieee.org/about/whatis/ code.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelemen99 Charles F. Kelemen (editor), Owen Astrachan, Doug Baldwin, Kim Bruce, Peter Henderson, Dale Skrien, Allen Tucker, and Charles Ban Loan. Computer Science Report to the CUPM Curriculum Foundations Workshop in Physics and Computer Science. Report from a workshop at Bowdoin College, October 28-31, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Koffman84 Elliot P. Koffman, Philip L. Miller, and Caroline E. Wardle. Recommended curriculum for CS1: 1984 a report of the ACM curriculum task force for CS1. Communications of the ACM, 27(10):998-1001, October 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Koffman85 Elliot P. Koffman, David Stemple, and Caroline E. Wardle. Recommended curriculum for CS2, 1984: A report of the ACM curriculum task force for CS2. Communications of the ACM, 28(8):815-818, August 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lee98 Edward A. Lee and David G. Messerschmitt. Engineering and education for the future. IEEE Computer, 77-85, January 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Lidtke99 Doris K. Lidtke, Gordon E. Stokes, Jimmie Haines, and Michael C. Mulder. ISCC '99: An information systems-centric curriculum '99, July 1999. http://www.iscc.unomaha.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin96 C. Dianne Martin, Chuck Huff, Donald Gotterbarn, Keith Miller. Implementing a tenth strand in the CS curriculum. Communications of the ACM, 39(12):75-84, December 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Mulder75 Michael C. Mulder. Model curricula for four-year computer science and engineering programs: Bridging the tar pit. Computer, 8(12):28-33, December 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Mulder84 Michael C. Mulder and John Dalphin. Computer science program requirements and accreditation-an interim report of the ACM/IEEE Computer Society joint task force. Communications of the ACM, 27(4):330-335, April 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Mulder98 Fred Mulder and Tom van Weert. Informatics in higher education: Views on informatics and noninformatics curricula. Proceedings of the IFIP/WG3.2 Working Conference on Informatics (computer science) as a discipline and in other disciplines: What is in common? London: Chapman and Hall, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Myers98 J. Paul Myers, Jr. and Henry M. Walker. The state of academic hiring in computer science: An interim review. SIGCSE Bulletin, 30(4):32a-35a, December 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. NACE2001 National Association of Colleges and Employers. Job outlook '01 (online version). http://www.jobweb.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Neumann95 Peter G. Neumann. Computer related risks. New York: ACM Press, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. NSF96 National Science Foundation Advisory Committee. Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington DC: National Science Foundation, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. NTIA99 National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, November 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Nunamaker82 Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr., J. Daniel Couger, Gordon B. Davis. Information systems curriculum recommendations for the 80s: Undergraduate and graduate programs. Communications of the ACM, 25(11):781-805, November 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. OTA88 Office of Technology Assessment. Educating scientists and engineers: Grade school to grad school. OTA-SET-377. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, June 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Paulk95 Mark Paulk, Bill Curtis, Mary Beth Chrissis, and Charles Weber. The capability maturity model: Guidelines for improving the software process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. QAA2000 Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. A report on benchmark levels for computing. Gloucester, England: Southgate House, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Ralston80 Anthony Ralston and Mary Shaw. Curriculum '78-Is computer science really that unmathematical. Communications of the ACM (23)2:67-70, February 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Roberts95 Eric Roberts, John Lilly, and Bryan Rollins. Using undergraduates as teaching assistants in introductory programming courses: An update on the Stanford experience. SIGCSE Bulletin (27)1:48-52, March 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Roberts99 Eric Roberts. Conserving the seed corn: Reflections on the academic hiring crisis. SIGCSE Bulletin (31)4:4-9, December 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. SAC67 President's Science Advisory Commission. Computers in higher education. Washington DC: The White House, February 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. SEEPP98 IEEE-CS/ACM Joint Task Force on Software Engineering Ethics and Professional Practices (SEEPP). Software engineering code of ethics and professional practice (Version 5.2). http://www.acm.org/serving/se/code.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Shaw85 Mary Shaw. The Carnegie-Mellon curriculum for undergraduate computer science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Shaw91 Mary Shaw and James E Tomayko. Models for undergraduate courses in software engineering. Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, January 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Shaw92 Mary Shaw. We can teach software better. Computing Research News 4(4):2- 12, September 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. SIGCHI92 Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. SWEBOK01 Software Engineering Coordinating Committee. Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK). Stone Man Version 0.95. A Project of the IEEE Computer Society, May 2001. http://www.swebok.org/stoneman/ version095.html/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Tucker91 Allen B. Tucker, Bruce H. Barnes, Robert M. Aiken, Keith Barker, Kim B. Bruce, J. Thomas Cain, Susan E. Conry, Gerald L. Engel, Richard G. Epstein, Doris K. Lidtke, Michael C. Mulder, Jean B. Rogers, Eugene H. Spafford, and A. Joe Turner. Computing Curricula '91. Association for Computing Machinery and the Computer Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Walker96 Henry M. Walker and G. Michael Schneider. A revised model curriculum for a liberal arts degree in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 39(12):85- 95, December 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Zadeh68 Lofti A. Zadeh. Computer science as a discipline. Journal of Engineering Education, 58(8):913-916, April 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computing curricula 2001

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Journal on Educational Resources in Computing
        Journal on Educational Resources in Computing  Volume 1, Issue 3es
        Fall 2001
        240 pages
        ISSN:1531-4278
        EISSN:1531-4278
        DOI:10.1145/384274
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2001 ACM

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 September 2001
        Published in jeric Volume 1, Issue 3es

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format