skip to main content
10.1145/503376.503382acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Comparison of two touchpad-based methods for numeric entry

Published:20 April 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Small hand-held touchpads can be used to replace stylus-based digitizing tablets when the use of a stylus is not convenient. In text entry tasks where the writing surface is held in a hand the error rate becomes a problem. The small size of strokes compared to the width of the fingertip and the additional imprecision caused by the interaction of the pad and finger movements make input very imprecise. We describe a new improved clock-face based stroke system for entering numbers with a touchpad. In a 20-session user study with 6 users we found slightly better throughput of successfully entered numbers with the proposed new system. This advantage was mainly due to lower error rate with the new system. User preference similarly slightly favored the new system over an earlier straightforward proposal based on the clock metaphor

References

  1. 3Com Corporation, Graffiti. http://www.palm.com/products/input/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Accot, J., and Zhai, S. Beyond fitts' law: Models for Trajectory-based HCI Tasks. Proc. of the CHI 97, 295--302, ACM, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Accot, J., and Zhai, S. Performance Evaluation of Input Devices in Trajectory-based Tasks: An Application of the Steering Law. Proc. of the CHI 99, 466--472, ACM, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bangay, S. Cirque Cat Driver for Linux. Available at http://cs.ru.ac.za/homes/cssb/cirque/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Callahan, J., Hopkins, D., Weiser, M., and Shneiderman, B. An Empirical Comparison of Pie vs. Linear Menus. Proc. of the CHI 88, 95--100, ACM, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. e-acute, Octave User's Manual. Available at http://www.e-acute.fr/English/manual/manualV1.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. LaLomia, M.J. User acceptance of handwritten recognition accuracy. CHI 94 Conference companion, 107, ACM, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Enns, N.R.N., and MacKenzie, I.S. Touchpad-based Remote Control Devices. CHI 98 Summary, 229--230,ACM, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Goldberg, D., and Richardson, K. Touch-typing With a Stylus. Proc. of the CHI 93, 80--87. ACM, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Isokoski, P. Model for Unistroke Writing Time. CHI Letters: Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2001, 3(1): 357--364, ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Isokoski, P., and Raisamo, R. Device Independent Text Input: A Rationale and an Example. Proc. of the Working conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI2000, 76--83, ACM Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kurtenbach, G., and Buxton, W. User Learning and Performance with Marking Menus. Proc. of the CHI94, 258--264, ACM, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kurtenbach, G., and Buxton, W. The Limits Of Expert Performance Using Hierarchic Marking Menus. Proc. of INTERCHI '93, 482--487, ACM, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kurtenbach, G., Sellen, A., and Buxton, B. An Empirical Evaluation of Some Articulatory and Cognitive Aspects of Marking Menus. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 1--23, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. MacKenzie, I.S., Nonnecke, B., Riddersma, S., McQueen, C., and Meltz, M. Alphanumeric Entry on Pen-based Computers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41, 775--792, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mankoff, J., and Abowd, G.D. Cirrin: a Word-level Unistroke Keyboard for Pen Input. Proc. of the ACM UIST 98, 213--214, ACM, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. McQueen, C., MacKenzie, I.S., and Zhang, S.X. An Extended Study of Numeric Entry on Pen-Based Computers. Proc. of Graphics Interface '95, 215--222, Canadian Information Processing Society, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Perlin, K. Quikwriting: Continuous Stylus-based Text Entry. Proc.of the ACM UIST 98, 215--216, ACM, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Venolia, D., and Neiberg, F. T-Cube: A Fast, Self-disclosing Pen-based Alphabet. Proc. of the CHI 94, 265-270, ACM, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of two touchpad-based methods for numeric entry

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2002
        478 pages
        ISBN:1581134533
        DOI:10.1145/503376
        • Conference Chair:
        • Dennis Wixon

        Copyright © 2002 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 April 2002

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '02 Paper Acceptance Rate61of414submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader