skip to main content
10.1145/505168.505170acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfoisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Towards a standard upper ontology

Published:17 October 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) is an upper level ontology that has been proposed as a starter document for The Standard Upper Ontology Working Group, an IEEE-sanctioned working group of collaborators from the fields of engineering, philosophy, and information science. The SUMO provides definitions for general-purpose terms and acts as a foundation for more specific domain ontologies. In this paper we outline the strategy used to create the current version of the SUMO, discuss some of the challenges that we faced in constructing the ontology, and describe in detail its most general concepts and the relations between them.

References

  1. 1.Allen, J. (1984) "Towards a general theory of action and time," Artificial Intelligence, 23, 123-154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Borgo, S., Guarino, N., and Masolo, C. (1997) "An Ontological Theory of Physical Objects," in L. Ironi (ed.), Proceedings of Eleventh International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning (QR'97), Cortona (Italia), 3-6 Giugno, 223-231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Borgo, S., Guarino, N., and Masolo, C. (1996) "A Pointless Theory of Space Based on Strong Connection and Congruence," in L. C. Aiello and J. Doyle (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR96), Morgan Kaufinann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Casati, R. and Varzi, A. (1995) Holes and Other Superficialities, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Casati, R., Smith, B. and Varzi, A. (1998) "Ontological Tools for Geographic Representation", in N. Guarino (ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems, 10s Press (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications), Washington DC, 77-85. http://wings.buffalo.edu/philosophy/faculty/smith/articles/fois(csv).htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.DAML (2001). DARPA Agent Markup Language, http://wwww. daml.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., and Rice, J. (1996) "The Ontolingua Server: a Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction," Proceedings of the 10th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based System Workshop (KA W95), Banff, Canada, http:l/ontolingua.stanford.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Fuchs, E. and Schwitter, R. (1996) "Attempt0 Controlled English (ACE ), " Proceedings of The First International Workshop On Controlled Language Applications, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 124-136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Genesereth, M. (1991). "Knowledge Interchange Format," Proceedings ofthe Second International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-91), J. Allen et al., (eds), Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 1991, 238-249. See also http://logic.stanford.edu/kif/kif.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Lenat, D. (1995) "Cyc: A Large-Scale Investment in Knowledge Infrastructure," Communications of the ACM, 38, no. 11 (November). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Levin, B. (1993) English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation, University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Niles, I and Pease, A. (2001) "Origins of the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology," Working Notes of the IJCAI-2001 Workshop on the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology, Seattle, 37- 42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Pease, A & Carrico, (1997) "JTF-ATD Core Plan Representation: A Progress Report," Proceedings of the AAAI-97 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Peirce, C. S. (1932) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol.2, C. Hartshome, et al (xeds.), Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (1995) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Schlenoff, C., Gruninger M., Tissot, F., Valois, J., Lubell, J., and Lee, J. (2000) The Process Specification Language (PSL): Overview and Version 1.0 Specfication, NISTIR 6459, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Simons, P. (1987) Parts: a Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Smith, B. (1994) "Fiat Objects," N. Guarino, L. Vieu and S. Pribbenow (eds.), Parts and Wholes: Conceptual Part- Whole Relations and Formal Mereology, 11th European Conference on ArtiJicial Intelligence, Amsterdam, 8 August 1994, 15-23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Smith, B. (1996) "Mereotopology: A Theory of Parts and Boundaries", Data and Knowledge Engineering, 20,287-303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Sowa, J. (2000) Knowledge Representation, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.SUO, (2001), The IEEE Standard Upper Ontology web site, http://suo.ieee.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Swartout, B., Patil, R., Knight, K. and Russ, T. (1996) "Ontosaurus: a tool for browsing and editing ontologies," Gaines, B.R. and Musen, M.A. (eds.), Proceedings of Tenth Knowledge Acquisition Workshop. (http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW96/swartout/ontosaurus_demo.html)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards a standard upper ontology

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        FOIS '01: Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001
        October 2001
        362 pages
        ISBN:1581133774
        DOI:10.1145/505168

        Copyright © 2001 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 October 2001

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader