ABSTRACT
The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) is an upper level ontology that has been proposed as a starter document for The Standard Upper Ontology Working Group, an IEEE-sanctioned working group of collaborators from the fields of engineering, philosophy, and information science. The SUMO provides definitions for general-purpose terms and acts as a foundation for more specific domain ontologies. In this paper we outline the strategy used to create the current version of the SUMO, discuss some of the challenges that we faced in constructing the ontology, and describe in detail its most general concepts and the relations between them.
- 1.Allen, J. (1984) "Towards a general theory of action and time," Artificial Intelligence, 23, 123-154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2.Borgo, S., Guarino, N., and Masolo, C. (1997) "An Ontological Theory of Physical Objects," in L. Ironi (ed.), Proceedings of Eleventh International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning (QR'97), Cortona (Italia), 3-6 Giugno, 223-231.Google Scholar
- 3.Borgo, S., Guarino, N., and Masolo, C. (1996) "A Pointless Theory of Space Based on Strong Connection and Congruence," in L. C. Aiello and J. Doyle (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR96), Morgan Kaufinann.Google Scholar
- 4.Casati, R. and Varzi, A. (1995) Holes and Other Superficialities, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- 5.Casati, R., Smith, B. and Varzi, A. (1998) "Ontological Tools for Geographic Representation", in N. Guarino (ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems, 10s Press (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications), Washington DC, 77-85. http://wings.buffalo.edu/philosophy/faculty/smith/articles/fois(csv).htmlGoogle Scholar
- 6.DAML (2001). DARPA Agent Markup Language, http://wwww. daml.org/Google Scholar
- 7.Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., and Rice, J. (1996) "The Ontolingua Server: a Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction," Proceedings of the 10th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based System Workshop (KA W95), Banff, Canada, http:l/ontolingua.stanford.edu/Google Scholar
- 8.Fuchs, E. and Schwitter, R. (1996) "Attempt0 Controlled English (ACE ), " Proceedings of The First International Workshop On Controlled Language Applications, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 124-136.Google Scholar
- 9.Genesereth, M. (1991). "Knowledge Interchange Format," Proceedings ofthe Second International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-91), J. Allen et al., (eds), Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 1991, 238-249. See also http://logic.stanford.edu/kif/kif.html.Google Scholar
- 10.Lenat, D. (1995) "Cyc: A Large-Scale Investment in Knowledge Infrastructure," Communications of the ACM, 38, no. 11 (November). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Levin, B. (1993) English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- 12.Niles, I and Pease, A. (2001) "Origins of the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology," Working Notes of the IJCAI-2001 Workshop on the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology, Seattle, 37- 42.Google Scholar
- 13.Pease, A & Carrico, (1997) "JTF-ATD Core Plan Representation: A Progress Report," Proceedings of the AAAI-97 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering.Google Scholar
- 14.Peirce, C. S. (1932) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol.2, C. Hartshome, et al (xeds.), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 15.Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (1995) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Schlenoff, C., Gruninger M., Tissot, F., Valois, J., Lubell, J., and Lee, J. (2000) The Process Specification Language (PSL): Overview and Version 1.0 Specfication, NISTIR 6459, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.Google Scholar
- 17.Simons, P. (1987) Parts: a Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- 18.Smith, B. (1994) "Fiat Objects," N. Guarino, L. Vieu and S. Pribbenow (eds.), Parts and Wholes: Conceptual Part- Whole Relations and Formal Mereology, 11th European Conference on ArtiJicial Intelligence, Amsterdam, 8 August 1994, 15-23.Google Scholar
- 19.Smith, B. (1996) "Mereotopology: A Theory of Parts and Boundaries", Data and Knowledge Engineering, 20,287-303. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Sowa, J. (2000) Knowledge Representation, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
- 21.SUO, (2001), The IEEE Standard Upper Ontology web site, http://suo.ieee.orgGoogle Scholar
- 22.Swartout, B., Patil, R., Knight, K. and Russ, T. (1996) "Ontosaurus: a tool for browsing and editing ontologies," Gaines, B.R. and Musen, M.A. (eds.), Proceedings of Tenth Knowledge Acquisition Workshop. (http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW96/swartout/ontosaurus_demo.html)Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Towards a standard upper ontology
Recommendations
Ontology paper: The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group
The W3C Semantic Sensor Network Incubator group (the SSN-XG) produced an OWL 2 ontology to describe sensors and observations - the SSN ontology, available at http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ssnx/ssn. The SSN ontology can describe sensors in terms of ...
Towards a Novel and Generic Approach for OWL Ontology Weighting
Semantic search is qualified by web-related enterprises as well as, academic research as a key technology, ensuring important improvements in terms of shared data understanding, while it leads to refined and targeted interpretations. Accordingly, ...
Linking FrameNet to the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (FOIS 2006)Deductive reasoning with natural language requires combining lexical resources with the world knowledge provided by ontologies. In this paper we describe the connection of FrameNet --a lexicon for English --to the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO). ...
Comments