skip to main content
10.1145/505168.505184acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfoisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Preventing existence

Published:17 October 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

We discuss the treatment of prevention statements in both natural language semantics and knowledge representation, with particular regard to existence entailments. First order representations with an explicit existence predicate are shown to not adequately capture the entailments of prevention statements. A linguistic analysis is framed in a higher order intensional logic, employing a Fregean notion of existence as instantiation of a concept. We discuss how this can be mapped to a Cyc style knowledge representation.

References

  1. 1.Brahman, R. J., D. L. McGuinness, and P. Patel-Schneider. Reducing classic to practice: Knowledge representation theory meets reality. Art@iciul Intelligence 114,203-237, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Cocchiarella, N. B. Philosophical perspectives on quantification in tense and modal logics. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol II, 309-353, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.van der Does, J. Applied QuantiJier Lo&s: Collectives & Naked Injinitives. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Everett, A. and T. Hofweber (eds.). Empty Names, Fiction and the Puzzle of Non-Existence. CSLI Publications, Stanford, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Fine, K. Reasoning with Arbitrary Objects. Blackwell, Oxford, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Frege, G. On sense and reference, 1892. Reprinted in P. T. Geach & M. Black (eds), Translations,from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Blackwell, Oxford, 1952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Gardenfors, P. and D. Makinson. Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment. Proceedings 2nd Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, 83-95, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Hirst, G. Existence assumptions in knowledge representation. Artificial Intelligence 49, 199-242, May 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Kaufmann, S. Aspects of the Meaning and Use of Conditionals. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Kratzer, A. An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607-653, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.Ladusaw, W. Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. Garland, New York, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Lenat, D., R. V. Guha, K. Pittman, D. Pratt, and M. Shepherd. Cyc: Towards programs with common sense. Communications of the ACM 33(8), August 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.McCarthy, J. First order theories of individual concepts and propositions. In J. E. Hayes, D. Michie and L. I. Mikulich, Machine Intelligence 9, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.J. McCarthy and S. Buvac. Formalizing context (expanded notes). In A. Aliseda, R. v. Glabbeek, and D. Westerstbhl, editors, Computing Natural Language. CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Montague, R. Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press, 1974. Edited by R. Thomason.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Westerstahl, D. Quantifiers in formal and natural languages. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol IV, 1- 131, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Zimmermamr, E. On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics 1, 149-179, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Preventing existence

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        FOIS '01: Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001
        October 2001
        362 pages
        ISBN:1581133774
        DOI:10.1145/505168

        Copyright © 2001 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 October 2001

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader